Originally Posted by radioraheem
The Winky Quillin incident is not shady. Why would USADA risk their huge reputation with those two fighters? Only a fool would let themselves be influenced by an article suggesting that a brand new organization is better than another organization with far more of a reputation and experience also. And believe it or not, not everyone has a price.
The allegations would be more believable if it were against VADA since they are brand new with far less of a reputation than USADA. If VADA does something shady, it won't create waves across the world, not even in America.
Winky himself asked to be subjected, with his money as well, and within a couple of days of getting tested the samples were then thrown away, how isn't that shady?