Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Interesting question. Which type of wins should be considered a bigger achievement.
View Single Post
Old 11-12-2012, 05:05 PM #8
RlCKY RlCKY is offline
Grade 10
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunnyvale
Age: 30
Posts: 5,781
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Rep Power: 35
RlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond reputeRlCKY has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 62,130.50
Bank: 36,778,473,540.45
Total Points: 36,778,535,670.95
have an apple.............. - bigsmoothh haha good picture - RossCA Happy New Year RICKY.. - !! AI-Holmes!! Happy New Years to you and yours bro! :beerchug: - jose830 hilarious thread - jas 
Default

If you just rated guys on their "abilities" then they wouldn't even have to fight each other. A fighter's resume is the only realistic measuring stick of his greatness. That translates to team sports as well. How many times does the team who looks excellent on paper fail to play to expectation?
RlCKY is offline   Reply With Quote