Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calabasas, Calif
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Total Points: 721,911,923,686,058.50
There is no "basically undisputed" Either you are or you're not. Meaning Michaelzweski did not clean out his division and Hopkins did. Your comparison is ridiculous.
Originally Posted by Halls of Fame;12642964[U
]Michalczewski once held 3 of the 4 titles, which is basically called "undisputed". [/U]he held the WBA, IBF and WBO title at one point and then held on to the WBO title. the lightheavyweight and the middleweight division have always been deep divisions throughout history so you can indeed compare middleweights to lightheavyweights.
in my top 5 I have guys like Bob Foster, Archie Moore, Michael Spinks, Michalczewski and Gene Tunney.
an old michal. losing to Gonzales (who is NOT a club fighter) doesnt mean anything. look at the guys Michal. beat and look at the guys Hopkins beat.
21 or 22 title defences from Michal. . thats called LONGEVITY. Michal won the 2 wars with Richard Hall. Roy Jones needed steroids to beat Richard Hall
As far as your silly Roy Jones comment is concerned, Hall also tested positive for a substance at higher levels than Jones. So that kills your ridiculous theory.
Last edited by joseph5620; 10-27-2012 at 02:13 PM.