Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Is it fair if Virgil Hill gets voted into the HOF but not Michalczewski?
View Single Post
#13
Old 10-27-2012, 01:11 PM
Welsh Jon
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,205
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Rep Power: 12 Welsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond reputeWelsh Jon has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 5,560,555,782,194.93
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 5,560,555,782,194.93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halls of Fame View Post
Michalczewski has the record of title defences in that division with around 22 title defences.
Hopkins has the record of title defences at middleweight with around 20 defences, and he is in the top 5 all time middleweights on pretty much anybody's list. now look at the guys Hopkins beat in those 20 defences and then compare them to the guys Michalczewski beat. u ll find out the opponents are on the same level
I wouldn't have B Hop anywhere near my top 5 middleweights list. And i wouldn't have Michalczwski anywhere near my top 20 light-heavyweights let alone top 5.

It's flawed logic anyway. You need to compare Michalczewski to other light-heavyweights not to middleweights. A top 5 light-heavyweight isn't necessarily the equal of a top 5 middleweight anyway.
Reply With Quote
Welsh Jon is offline