View Single Post
#5
Old 10-08-2012, 09:59 AM
110110110
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,196
Rep Power: 10 110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute110110110 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 20,057,386.40
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 20,057,386.40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatLine View Post
true 168 Dawson was just a shadow of the fighter he is at 175
Or he just meet a fighter that have dominated every topnotch figheter he has ever faced.

Why is it soo diffficult to understand that Ward is just a better fighter and that is why dawson got beat, and not because of weight ?

Dawson have been saying for years that he wanted to move back to 168 where he used to fight, he said making weight was no problem, have not said one word after the fight about the weight being a factor for the lose, infact he has said the opposit.

I dont get it, if ward was some medicore boxer and Dawson got dominated then it might look dubious, but we are talking Andre Ward the gold medal winner that just won the supersix by dominating topnotch prioven fighters.

The most stupid of all theory`s in boxing is those that beleive that when a boxer loses there is something wrong with him.

Let me put it this way, if dawson had faught Kessler that night at 168, he would proberly have boxed kesslers ears of and idiots like you would proberly be saying that Dawson beats Ward

Last edited by 110110110; 10-08-2012 at 10:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
110110110 is offline