View Single Post
#1
Old 09-30-2012, 01:33 AM
pturtle
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 448
Rep Power: 0 pturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these partspturtle is infamous around these parts
Points: 34,240.47
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 34,240.47
Default How can anyone defend Hopkins in the “who ducked who” wars for Roy?

Hopkins was certainly the duck. He called out Roy for the rematch I believe for more exposure.

He wanted a 50/50 with Roy but I thought Roy being p4p king at the time was generous in offering 60/40 to a guy he was more relevant then and already defeated.

Can anyone say B-Hop deserved a 50/50 fight when:

Roy was considered the best fighter in the world at the time

The bigger name and bigger draw.

Already won the first fight.

And Hopkins beating Roy would do much more for him the Roy beating Hopkins again would do for Roy.

Can anyone really say this wasn’t a duck?
Reply With Quote
pturtle is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<