View Single Post
#33
Old 09-11-2012, 06:28 AM
chloelloyd
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 0 chloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond reputechloelloyd has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 500,038,241.08
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 500,038,241.08
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Lowkey- View Post
This thread highlights how grossly overrated Tyson was and still is and how understated the Klits are wonder why.
Not really. Other then one poster who keep insisting a 96-97 Tyson would have beaten Prime Wlad, the other guys all admit at best it's a 50-50 fight and Tyson would have been a under dog. No under estimating of K2 in any way.

The Poll results is exactly how it should look like.

96-97 Tyson is nowhere near what he was during his prime. BUT IF YOU TAKE OUT k2 and put the 96 version of Mike in right now,other then maybe a a fully motivated David Haye, everyone's getting knocked out.

Guys like CURRENT Price don't have the experience, guys like Mitchell,Jennings would have been KO'ED within 4-5 Rounds. Povetkin would not have even taken the fight, much less have a chance. Arreloa is way too slow for even a semi shot Mike and would have been stopped.
Reply With Quote
chloelloyd is offline