Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Should Peterson be allowed to keep his title?
View Single Post
Old 08-11-2012, 12:22 AM #20
ronnie_N. ronnie_N. is offline
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,024
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 9
ronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond reputeronnie_N. has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 20,052.12
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 20,052.12
Default

no, its just disgusting that peterson got to keep his title...

tests is a joke...

i think it must be stipulated on all boxing contracts that once a fighter was caught cheating, that fighter must be stripped off (in case of title fights) and an automatic reversal of verdict must be made (title/non-title fights)... if the major boxing bodies will welcome this contract stipulation, then they don't have any reason to f**ck up again...
ronnie_N. is offline   Reply With Quote