View Single Post
#17
Old 08-09-2012, 06:09 PM
pnksntdead
Contender
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LOS ANGELES
Age: 35
Posts: 440
Rep Power: 31 pnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond reputepnksntdead has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 670,027,059.87
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 670,027,059.87
Default

good point. i think that they'll be weighing the economic impact of choosing a bradley rematch over a marquez or cotto rematch. the bradly fight did 900k whole the 3rd marquez fight did 1.3 or so and a cotto fight, after cotto resurgence, could conceivably do a good bit over 1 M buys.

if the bradley rematch sells under 900k while they pass up a potential 1.3 or more buys versus marquez, that'll be a few million less for pac to bank. of course, i think that the marquez rematch is a way riskier fight so he may make more but if he loses then his marketability plummets.
Reply With Quote
pnksntdead is offline