Originally Posted by Mintcar923
He had some awesome skills back in the '90's but then again, he fought a lot of stiffs. He had beaten James Toney and outpointed Hopkins earlier in his career. Even though he holds wins over them, do you believe he was really superior? He was an excellent fighter but I don't think he was quite as good as Hopkins...
Yes, and I generally find that virtually the only people on the other side of this debate are people not old enough to vividly remember his prime career, but are old enough to remember Hopkins' era of dominance..