[QUOTE=dj Pepe;11909327]1:54-2:05 on the first video.
She saw nothing, she is just assuming.
Why call her an "eyewitness" when she saw nothing. There's a difference between SEEING a guy chase a kid down and shoot him as oppose to hearing a gunshot and ASSUME a guy chased down a kid and shot him.
That's why they didn't ask her shit, cause she has nothing worth saying. What else does she have to offer?
I heard cries for help and a gunshot.
Everything else she is saying is an opinion that will do nothing for the case.
I was thinking she seems to be very contradictory, and jumping to conclusions. . . She implies like she SAW the man shoot him by saying "nobody was on the ground", and hten she goes on to say "I KNOW it was Traybon who screamed because they stopped after the gunshot". . . That could just as easily mean that he no longer needed help once he shot him. Was it a head shot? Otherwise, wouldn't he still be alive for at least a few minutes and screaming, etc.?
SHe seems to be moreso REACTING to the controversy, rather than simply saying what she saw, or didn't see. . . .