Originally Posted by MANIAC310
and how exactly do we know they don't have a bias?....
I wouldn't trust these so called "witnesses"
1:54-2:05 on the first video.
She saw nothing, she is just assuming.
Why call her an "eyewitness" when she saw nothing. There's a difference between SEEING
a guy chase a kid down and shoot him as oppose to hearing a gunshot and ASSUME
a guy chased down a kid and shot him.
That's why they didn't ask her shi
t, cause she has nothing worth saying. What else does she have to offer?
I heard cries for help and a gunshot.
Everything else she is saying is an opinion that will do nothing for the case.
Any more footage of other witnesses?