Floyd bro.. being greedy is the subject, Floyd not having legacy is the subject.
Originally Posted by Roman Moreno
TBH, I didn't even read on line of what you just posted. I just want to still know about this "original" 4 horseman.
A. What do you call Greb, Walker, Rosenbloom, and Flowers.
B. How does any of that relate to -my boy, my favorite active fighter, the man who was the reason for one of the greatest nights in boxing history- Pacquiao fighting for easy paydays and not legacy?
Firstly I answered it awhile ago the way It should based on the thread. The fighters you have mentioned are great fighters who fought the best they can, hence the 4 horsemen tag. The best fight the best in their generation.
Pac had the same proving his fighting spirit having fought them in a round robin. These are , Barrera, Morales, Marquez and Pac.
By the way, There are other threads for you to look at or make one that would suite your irrelevant question for this post.. Read the thread. Then comment intelligently. Don't be like the I'm so sorry guy lol
It's about fair game, Pac's position in the split.
This is about principle. What is due Pac's should be given. You yourself won't agree to a 40 million guarantee with no ppv shares if you know there is a very big possibility you can get over 100million more. If you don't get it, it just means your a retarded fool like your delusional racist idol. Go be sheep then.
It's called highway robbery if Pac agrees to Floyd. Nobody wants to have that feeling of being ripped off. Its a matter of principle for Pac while for Floyd its a matter of being a fraud and projecting he wants the fight when he knows darn well its a deal breaker.
A fraud will always be a fraud. Ducking at it's best.