Originally Posted by dorruel2.0
Cotto beat Margarito in a clean fight and lost a questionable one. Wheras Corrales knocked Castillo out and was shot in the second fight (as was castillo) but Corrales made the weight and had a weight disadvantage in the rematch, and you want to call that more of a legit win than cotto over margs gtfo. As for Mayweather I believe Castillo did enough to win that 1st fight he LOST and Mayweather schooled him the second time around. Mayweather never fought Cotto so we cant say anything about that because Floyd ducked that one. Cotto also beat guys like Bailey, Malignaggi, Quintana, all at their BEST. His resume imo is better than Castillo's respectively.
Blah, Margarito was done a shell of himself....Completely shot had nothing left. Even more worse off than Cotto was and even with a pre-damaged eye going into the bout to make it worse.
I don't have any problem with someone saying that Corrales win is a more legit win than the Marg win. But, it's not by very much.
Cotto has more depth than what JLC has IMO.
And, Floyd didn't duck Cotto.
It seems like the bias one here is you sir.