View Single Post
#16
Old 12-30-2011, 06:22 PM
dorruel2.0
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 8 dorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond reputedorruel2.0 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 55,072.51
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 55,072.51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DempseyRollin View Post
n oh yea, u should remove that margarito win.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DempseyRollin View Post
nahhh...the chico win was much better than the margarito win. i dont even see how they are comparable. margarito was shot. chico wasnt. and even if u argue chico was, it was castillo who made him that way.
biased much??
Cotto beat Margarito in a clean fight and lost a questionable one. Wheras Corrales knocked Castillo out and was shot in the second fight (as was castillo) but Corrales made the weight and had a weight disadvantage in the rematch, and you want to call that more of a legit win than cotto over margs gtfo. As for Mayweather I believe Castillo did enough to win that 1st fight he LOST and Mayweather schooled him the second time around. Mayweather never fought Cotto so we cant say anything about that because Floyd ducked that one. Cotto also beat guys like Bailey, Malignaggi, Quintana, all at their BEST. His resume imo is better than Castillo's respectively.

Last edited by dorruel2.0; 12-30-2011 at 06:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
dorruel2.0 is offline