Originally Posted by ThePrince
I like Naazim, think he's one of the great ambassadors for boxing, but come on man. How do you lose every round, get knocked down, run away from round 3 on, only land 66 total punches... and then have the nerve to claim you 'exposed' a fighter.
I think Cotto, Clottey, and Margarito
have MUCH better arguments for having 'exposed' Pacquiao.
Margarito a better argument for having exposed Pacquiao?