Tweet
He's not even flexing against Hatton and he's more defined. It's not a body building contest, but the undefined gut will be a good target.
-
He's not even flexing against Hatton and he's more defined. It's not a body building contest, but the undefined gut will be a good target. -
I totally agree, Cotto looks to e in bette shape!!
Cotto is not even flexing!! -
Pacquiao looks about the same, except he looks like he didn't have to cut as much weight. He's not a "small" guy, like people pretend.Comment
-
Appearances can be deceiving, Middleweight Champion Kelly Pavlik can tell you that. Just looking at him, ppl wouldn't have expected him to knockout Miranda and Taylor the way he did.Comment
-
Somebody post the JMM-Pac 2 weigh in. You could see Pacquiao's facial bones. He looks a lot better at these weights. That's why I really don't have much interest in a Pac-JMM trilogy.Comment
-
Pavlik has a different body type and you're missing the point entirely.Originally posted by Freddy Krueger View Post
It's as if Mayweather instead of having the deep cut 12 pack he always carries into weigh ins, suddenly looking soft around the middle. Look at the difference.Comment
-
I've had to point out to 3 posters today..... That latissimus dorsi flex Pac is doing tucks in his abs. Like this....Originally posted by QUELOQUE View Post
He's not even flexing against Hatton and he's more defined. It's not a body building contest, but the undefined gut will be a good target.
Comment
-
but he also looks alot stronger than usual....Originally posted by queloque View Post
he's not even flexing against hatton and he's more defined. It's not a body building contest, but the undefined gut will be a good target.Comment
-
Exactly, some people are just too dumb to understand these type of threads.Originally posted by QUELOQUE View PostComment
-
Same Flex but from DLH-PAC weigh-in to prove my point.
Comment
Comment