Losing 2 out of almost 50 fights against arguably the 2 best boxers in the world

[-X-]

Means that you're a ****ty boxer.

Correct?

[AssasinKing]

lol i was thinking same....funny how people change their minds so quickly without thinking

[ИATAS]

yeah you gotta give a ton of respect to hatton for fighting the best in the first place. Sure he came up short, but it's mayweather & pacman after all, two ATG's.

[oojaksoo]

yeah you gotta give a ton of respect to hatton for fighting the best in the first place. Sure he came up short, but it's mayweather & pacman after all, two ATG's.

Preety much what I would of posted.

[Bhopreign]

Means that you're a ****ty boxer.

Correct?

Its not that he lost to the best but how he lost, he looked amateurish coming in with hands down face first straight in. Disgusting.

[Bhopreign]

yeah you gotta give a ton of respect to hatton for fighting the best in the first place. Sure he came up short, but it's mayweather & pacman after all, two ATG's.

Easy to fight the best when youre getting 10+ million, sign me up.

[Kobe Bryant]

Its about who you beat. Tye Fields had a good record before he was killed by Barret.

[SHB]

Depends who the 50 are against really.

I love Ricky to bits but when he's fought a top P4P fighter he's come up short. Just the way it is. He's had a cracking career either way.

[FreshPrince]

Beating no good prime competition makes you good?

[Pullcounter]

Means that you're a ****ty boxer.

Correct?

I don't get why its so shameful to lose to the 2 best fighters of this era.