turnedup

I couldn't let that one go by, sorry. Maybe if I had seen you be just as critical of Pacquiao for not testing then I could say that you're being even handed.

But it seems like you have an agenda against JMM or something.

See that makes no sense to me: how are you going to say that you suspect those who use USADA more than those who don't take them? Stricter testing is better than the regular commission testing. Period.

But you are certainly entitled to your opinion. At least you have given it some thought. I'll try to give you the benefit of the doubt next time before giving red K.

It's just that there are so many trolls and biased posters here these days that it's hard to keep track of the ones who are being sincere.

USADA is flawed but it's still better than any testing Pacquiao has ever done. And xylocaine is not illegal in Nevada so no, Floyd is not a cheater.

People complain about Heredia and say that he knows how to beat the tests but doesn't the same thing apply to Conte? He was the man who hooked people up with "the clear and the cream" after all. So what does it matter if Donaire does year round testing? For all I know Conte could be giving him stuff to beat the tests too.

All I'm saying is that people need to be fair and criticize everybody who is suspicious NOT just the fighters they have a grudge against.

As long as you are critical of BOTH Conte and Heredia then that's fine. But I've never seen you talk bad about Donaire and his S&C coach. Just about Marquez and his.

I've also seen you be critical of Floyd's stricter testing. It might not be ideal but never, not once, have you questioned why Pacquiao doesn't do even that much. Or why Pac didn't go along with it when Shane Mosley and Marquez offered to do it.

I have never once seen you criticize Pacquiao's team and promoter for rejecting stricter testing. Why is that?

Good to see u post, u use intelligence and respect.
One of the few on this site anymore