take your pick


<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZYHSHd1xfpY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZYHSHd1xfpY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zWlfbzt5fqU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zWlfbzt5fqU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

both are great rounds but i do believe pac-em's round 2 is better. (well, im biased i guess :D)

minbe would be hagler and hearns because coming to the fight hearns was picked to win it unlike pac who did a tune up :D LOL! and its a one sided affair while hagler's face was messed up after only the 2nd round and then went on to win the fight..

Hagler-Hearns of course....

Pac-MOrales III is too one sided.....

hagler hearns pa rin. ung kay pac kasi dehado n tlga si morales e

both are great rounds but i do believe pac-em's round 2 is better. (well, im biased i guess :D)

just got out of my nuthugging, ok, mas ok pa rin yung hagler-hearns, 2nd lang yung pac-em 3 :D