Which MMA organization do you like better and why?
I prefer the UFC, I like their additional weight classes and match making better, if they had Pride money they would bury Pride.
I hate the way Pride presents their shows, I just find it kind of corny and there mismatches are ridiculous sometimes.
12-10-2002, 06:22 PM
I think both are good, but I prefer Pride cause I like the ring over the cage nothing more than that :)
12-10-2002, 06:46 PM
The UFC it has more credability. Sometimes people questions often as far match making ,booking matches late in the game works, champions not defending there titles very much ect. Ufc covers more weight classes
12-10-2002, 09:19 PM
i prefer the UFC cuzz like everyone is saying, the match making, weight divisions and not a big factor is the cage. pride has alot of great fighters but i don't like how big the ring is and how they re-mount when it gets too close to the ropes. i think it just takes the aggression away when they do that.
12-10-2002, 09:21 PM
UFC for reasons listed above, but I do like the ring better than the cage........
12-10-2002, 09:23 PM
Pride has the dollars and therefore the fighters...UFC the weight classes. I prefer the Pride rules though and find that the ring makes fighters be more creative than just stacking someopne against the cage.
Ideally I would like to see one organisation, competing around the world as a SuperMMA comp, similar to K-1. All the fantasy match ups would become a reality and MMA would be seen by more people than ever before
12-10-2002, 10:53 PM
Pride easily then shooto.
12-11-2002, 02:26 AM
Pride has the best fighters.
ring over cage IMO.
12-11-2002, 04:20 AM
2 months ago...pride
but now i have to say ufc! i dont like whats happening to pride!
12-11-2002, 04:23 AM
nothing beats the octagon
UFC no doubt!
Octagon! Oh yeah!
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.