View Full Version : 80's vs 90's middlewieghts


Memorex
02-06-2005, 06:50 PM
who do you guys think were better, sugar ray-tommy hearns-marvin hagler or the trio of oscar - tito- bernard hopkins

Slipx
02-06-2005, 07:24 PM
ray hearns hagler. a prime hagler would devour a prime hopkins.

Tha Greatest
02-06-2005, 10:15 PM
Leonard beats De La Hoya easily
Hearns will KO Trinidad before 3 rounds
Hagler-hopkins would be good cuz hopkins is smart

80's better no doubt

Thomas Hearns-My favorite fighter!!
Leonard really knew how to break someones face in half with his lil flurries.....no i'm joking

Floydmayweather
02-06-2005, 10:41 PM
I think its close but give a slight edge to the 80's

Clay AikSkins
02-06-2005, 10:49 PM
80's all the way.

kadyo
02-06-2005, 11:00 PM
I don't think 90's is ever a close approximation of the 80's.

england4ever
02-06-2005, 11:04 PM
I think the 80s has alot more talent and fractionally more power. Also the fighters fought each other more often which made for better viewing

Tha Greatest
02-06-2005, 11:16 PM
Do u actually think De La Hoya would have a chance against Sugar Ray Leonard?

Do you think Felx Trinidad would get passed Tommys right hand?
Hell NO! Hearns would destroy Trinidad!!DESTROY!!!Trinidad aint no hagler!

Hagler and Hopkins would be good to but it would be a close one so i cant tell

Southeast_Friend
02-06-2005, 11:58 PM
How about "Terrible" making it to the Hall of Fame????

Floydmayweather
02-07-2005, 12:08 AM
He will make it for sure.

mr. bojangles
02-07-2005, 12:10 AM
SRL beats Oscar, Tito and B-Hop.

So can the Marvelous One.

The Hitman can beat these three also, but his chin is suspect. So, it's vice-versa.