Palma
10-04-2004, 07:03 AM
Check it out! The new Top 20 Pound-Pound list
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=1890529
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=1890529
|
View Full Version : Do you agree with this list? Palma 10-04-2004, 07:03 AM Check it out! The new Top 20 Pound-Pound list http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=1890529 neils7147933 10-04-2004, 10:57 AM Check it out! The new Top 20 Pound-Pound list http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=1890529 De La Hoya, Toney, Tszyu, Barrera, Calzaghe are all ranked too high. Spinks and JMM Marquez are a tad low. SonnyG8R 10-04-2004, 11:06 AM I think KT is ranked too low. De La Hoya and Tarver are too high. Not too take anything from Tarver but #3 is a stretch for a guy whose only real impressive victory came against a possibly Over-the-hill RJJ. chilly9876 10-04-2004, 11:06 AM i think tarver shouldnt have been above morales,tarver won with a one punch k.o in the second round not a 12 round domination,pac-man is also a tad high,with only one huge win and a draw with jmm. imo it should be 1,hopkins 2,fmj 3,morales 4,winky wright 5,spinks(hate his style,but he beat the top dogs) 6,jmm & pac-man 7,de la hoya 8,chico (rest dont matter) Explosivo 10-04-2004, 11:11 AM I wonder where Tito would have been if they made that list after the ass beating he gave to Mayo Saturday night. .::|ULTIMATE|::. 10-04-2004, 02:10 PM No i dont and doug is a hypocrite S.O.B. He likes to say something in his Online show, The Next Round, but then he writes different things in. elveiel 10-04-2004, 02:16 PM De La Hoya, Toney, Tszyu, Barrera, Calzaghe are all ranked too high. Spinks and JMM Marquez are a tad low. I think you have it a little wrong! shouldnt you have said Calzaghe is ranked a little low!?!?!? Calzaghe rules the Super middle and nobody dares to fight him, Easily a top 10 fighter! I cant believe Tarver is number 3!!! one punch doesnt make you elite, especially when glen Johnson proved Jones isnt the fighter he once was. I bet 5000 on Calzaghe beating Tarver. I'll only bet one person so first come first served!! neils7147933 10-04-2004, 02:20 PM I think you have it a little wrong! shouldnt you have said Calzaghe is ranked a little low!?!?!? Calzaghe rules the Super middle and nobody dares to fight him, Easily a top 10 fighter! Lacy said he'd go over and fight Calzaghe after he fought Saturday night. Super middle is a weak division. I can see an argument for him in the top 20, but not the top 10. And that's about all I have to say without repeating an entire conversation we had on another Calzaghe thread. elveiel 10-04-2004, 02:23 PM Lacy said he'd go over and fight Calzaghe after he fought Saturday night. Super middle is a weak division. I can see an argument for him in the top 20, but not the top 10. And that's about all I have to say without repeating an entire conversation we had on another Calzaghe thread. :p The middlweight division is weak but i'm not complaining Hopkins is number 1. Sir_Jose 10-04-2004, 03:12 PM I have defanetly seen worst from other mainstream sites Joe Calzaghe doesn't rule anything. I think Lacy would murder Calzaghe elveiel 10-04-2004, 03:52 PM I have defanetly seen worst from other mainstream sites Joe Calzaghe doesn't rule anything. I think Lacy would murder Calzaghe What more does he need to do? if he doesnt rule then who does? I have seen Lacy fight a couple of times, i havent seen enough to have an opinion on him. Calzaghe isnt the most gifted of fighters but any man who could beat him is a ****ing good fighter. jack_the_rippuh 10-04-2004, 03:56 PM Is Glencoffe Johnson a pound for pound top 15 candidate now? Palma 11-30-2005, 05:21 AM how are you Sonny!? Glad to see your still around. whdempsey 11-30-2005, 06:21 AM Dude, this is from like a year ago, at least. So it's all completely wrong at this point. masterdirector 11-30-2005, 06:22 AM Dude, this is from like a year ago, at least. So it's all completely wrong at this point. this topic is from over a year ago too. The guy just for some odd reason thought it'd be a good idea to respond after this long. whdempsey 11-30-2005, 06:50 AM Oooooooh. That makes sense. Thanks. masterdirector 11-30-2005, 06:56 AM Oooooooh. That makes sense. Thanks. yeah I thought it was a new post at first myself. Then I looked up at the date of the post itself. As soon as I saw Hopkins at the top of the list, I knew something was fishy. Which I didn't agree with that list back then either. Floyd was still more deserving, in my opinion. |