View Full Version : whos hands r quicker floyd(current) or (prime)mosley


Versastyle
03-04-2006, 12:58 AM
mosley got quick ass hands its a toss up but ill go with mosely

ferocity
03-04-2006, 01:05 AM
I never though much of Mosleys speed cause when he get tired of in brawling mode he would then throw bombs one at a time, their for reducing his speed. Also his speed hasn't always showed up in ever fight.

Versastyle
03-04-2006, 01:12 AM
I never though much of Mosleys speed cause when he get tired of in brawling mode he would then throw bombs one at a time, their for reducing his speed. Also his speed hasn't always showed up in ever fight.


most fights though and at 135 alot. fighting oscar a hell of alot

Shaolin Bushido
03-04-2006, 01:13 AM
If at all, I haven't seen many guys who think Shane could or can take Mayweather at 147 til now ....


Mosley by late KO over that muh****a. Judah first.

Versastyle
03-04-2006, 01:13 AM
If at all, I haven't seen many guys who think Shane could or can take Mayweather at 147 til now ....


Mosley by late KO over that muh****a. Judah first.



but i said hand speed :p

Shaolin Bushido
03-04-2006, 01:15 AM
Oh. I'll say Mayweather. He sorta cat cuffs ya compared to Shane but he's a little quicker imo.

Shaolin Bushido
03-04-2006, 01:16 AM
I think I'm a case of undiagnosed ADD mang. My posts support this.

dansweeney
03-04-2006, 01:18 AM
Oh. I'll say Mayweather. He sorta cat cuffs ya compared to Shane but he's a little quicker imo.

shane at lightweight had faster handspeed than mayweather, but mayweather's reflexes are faster, and that combined with his handspeed make him appear faster than mosley. mosley would kayo him though, much more power

mECHsLAVE
03-04-2006, 01:57 AM
Floyd is probably quicker with one punch, but SS had quicker combos.

And a prime Meldrick Taylor was faster than both of them.

RwK
03-04-2006, 01:59 AM
Floyd is probably quicker with one punch, but SS had quicker combos.

And a prime Meldrick Taylor was faster than both of them.

Obvious called. It want's it's sediments back, now.

mECHsLAVE
03-04-2006, 02:20 AM
Obvious called. It want's it's sediments back, now.

LOL You could be nice about it and just say you agree.

By the way, the word you are searching for is "sentiments." "Sediments" is like what settles to the bottom of your orange juice if you forget to shake it up. Hehe...