Derranged
02-14-2006, 05:40 PM
Whos wins- 1990s Toney when he was 168 or Lacy now?
|
View Full Version : Toney vs Lacy 168 Derranged 02-14-2006, 05:40 PM Whos wins- 1990s Toney when he was 168 or Lacy now? DiegoFuego 02-14-2006, 05:50 PM Toney all the way, baby. What has Lacy shown to make you think he could take James Toney at 168?! LostGuy 02-14-2006, 06:41 PM man dude thats funny toney for sure and it isnt even close. only a person who never saw toney then would ask such a question. GTL 02-14-2006, 06:49 PM the only disadvantage for tony is that hell be weight drained.. to be honest.. if u put lacy in with a pure boxer. he will be exposed.. lacy has skills.. but his power is what makes up for what he lacks in toney ud yrrej 02-14-2006, 06:50 PM An easy call.... Derranged 02-14-2006, 06:50 PM man dude thats funny toney for sure and it isnt even close. only a person who never saw toney then would ask such a question. I was just posting it for the hell of it, others have posted similar threads like Roy Jones vs Lacy at 168. dansweeney 02-14-2006, 07:04 PM Lacy would have an excellent shot at knocking out toney, his power at 168 cannot be questioned, probably a toney win by decision RwK 02-14-2006, 07:04 PM The only way for Toney to make 168 is to lose a couple appendages. Toney has a better shot at reaching 300. Derranged 02-14-2006, 07:14 PM The only way for Toney to make 168 is to lose a couple appendages. Toney has a better shot at reaching 300. No I meant Toney then- in the 1990s vs the Lacy of today at 168. Hell no not now, I dont think Toney can reach 190 now. JuicyJuice 02-14-2006, 07:53 PM Abit of a mismatch from the very start, then Toney would pick it up more in the latter rounds and stop Lacy or knock him out. Burzum_666 02-14-2006, 08:16 PM Toney without question Zab Super Judah 02-15-2006, 04:39 AM Whos wins- 1990s Toney when he was 168 or Lacy now? wow Toney would have stopped lacy before round 10 GunStar 02-15-2006, 04:56 AM Toney always fights great against fighters like Lacy. Easy fight for Toney. |