View Full Version : Pacquiao vs Morales III


PacKillsMorales
02-04-2006, 04:03 PM
who wins in the rubber match, fought at 130, then 135

i tip pac to ko morales again at 130, then ud him at 135

JMCbulls
02-04-2006, 05:34 PM
pac at both!!he owns!

SuckaPunch
02-04-2006, 05:58 PM
You forgot to put 131,132,133 and 134. Morales will try all those four weight limits to beat Pac :D

If he can't beat Pac in all those weight limits, then it's really time to retire.

Manfredo Jr
02-04-2006, 06:08 PM
im a morales fan but i think pac will win again :(

SuckaPunch
02-04-2006, 06:18 PM
im a morales fan but i think pac will win again :(

Pac KO1 Naz in less than 30 seconds.

I thought you were gonna pay up since Naz ain't coming back no more.

Sn1
02-04-2006, 06:45 PM
not many morales backers here anymore.

looks like they fell of the proverbial bandwagon.

czars_salad
02-05-2006, 03:12 AM
pac against morales, again? pac wins in both divisions

Sn1
02-05-2006, 02:28 PM
morales won the first, pac won the second

who's to say the 3rd wont be a different fight again

PacKillsMorales
02-12-2006, 08:40 AM
not many peeps choosing to vote is there ?
the fights still set for september according to boxrec

ps: i thought this thread was in non stop boxing.....

czars_salad
02-13-2006, 04:12 AM
not many peeps choosing to vote is there ?
the fights still set for september according to boxrec

ps: i thought this thread was in non stop boxing.....
everybody knows what pac will do to EM :p

AIR_KENG
02-13-2006, 04:19 AM
You forgot to put 131,132,133 and 134. Morales will try all those four weight limits to beat Pac :D

If he can't beat Pac in all those weight limits, then it's really time to retire.
nyahahahahahaha!!! nice one bro...

kadyo
02-13-2006, 04:21 AM
morales won the first, pac won the second

who's to say the 3rd wont be a different fight again
logic dictates that!

PacKillsMorales
02-16-2006, 04:43 AM
ok ok so its unanimous lol..well almost

abdiel2k3
02-16-2006, 04:54 AM
ok ok
so we know u got points
u dont have to have a kool billion out just to show us up
Lol
and ur welcome

Sn1
02-16-2006, 04:57 AM
ok ok
so we know u got points
u dont have to have a kool billion out just to show us up
Lol
and ur welcome
lmfao. ive just fallen in love with a boy.
damn abdiel your so fine, your so fine you blow my mind.
your abdiel, abdiel ...... :p

abdiel2k3
02-16-2006, 04:57 AM
after rewatchin the 2nd fight
its so damn obvious what happened
in the 1st fight morales was all about as roy put it
"beaten that body"
in the 2nd fight he went head hunting
and this time around it was manny who was
"beaten that body"

Sn1
02-16-2006, 05:09 AM
after rewatchin the 2nd fight
its so damn obvious what happened
in the 1st fight morales was all about as roy put it
"beaten that body"
in the 2nd fight he went head hunting
and this time around it was manny who was
"beaten that body"
i think morales was doin exactly the same thing as in
the 1st fight, but pac didnt get cut so was able to
sustain enough pressure to weaken morales for the later
rds. the overuse of the left in the 1st also came into
play as he used a wide variety of shots in the 2nd,
including those brutal bodyshots & right hooks

abdiel2k3
02-16-2006, 05:13 AM
i think morales was doin exactly the same thing as in
the 1st fight, but pac didnt get cut so was able to
sustain enough pressure to weaken morales for the later
rds. the overuse of the left in the 1st also came into
play as he used a wide variety of shots in the 2nd,
including those brutal bodyshots & right hooks
nah it was in one sense the same
counterin pac
pressuring him
but the diff was that in the 1st fight morales body attack prevented pac from being able to "fire up" or take control of the fight
second time around
morales didnt work the body
it allowed pac to use his reserve cuz all them hits to the head didnt do much

Sn1
02-16-2006, 05:22 AM
nah it was in one sense the same
counterin pac
pressuring him
but the diff was that in the 1st fight morales body attack prevented pac from being able to "fire up" or take control of the fight
second time around
morales didnt work the body
it allowed pac to use his reserve cuz all them hits to the head didnt do much
maybe i need to watch the 1st fight again as ive only seen it once.
i really think the cut stopped pac more than the bodyshots.
saying that, when pac koed morales he was pretty gassed himself,
so maybe the bodyshots in the 1st fight were enough to stop pac
doing the same thing he did n the 2nd fight. im not sold yet tho

czars_salad
02-16-2006, 08:27 AM
nah it was in one sense the same
counterin pac
pressuring him
but the diff was that in the 1st fight morales body attack prevented pac from being able to "fire up" or take control of the fight
second time around
morales didnt work the body
it allowed pac to use his reserve cuz all them hits to the head didnt do much
his counter punches were of no use.
pac can carry his punches while the other way around for morales.
period.

Sn1
02-16-2006, 08:45 AM
i dont think pac can handle morales power as much as peeps think.
its more a case of morales not being able to handle pacs pressure
as well as launching an effective offensive of his own. IMO pac
was in trouble again until morales' legs went around rd 6 or 7.

also, when morales threw combos pacquiao stopped, backed up, or
threw short, less powerful combos in reply. this for me meant
that as long as morales had the stamina to jab going forward the
decision was going to be his. if morales legs went because of
pacs punches, or for some other reason we will never know. but for
the time being i would never count morales out of the rubbermatch