PacKillsMorales
02-04-2006, 04:03 PM
who wins in the rubber match, fought at 130, then 135
i tip pac to ko morales again at 130, then ud him at 135
i tip pac to ko morales again at 130, then ud him at 135
|
View Full Version : Pacquiao vs Morales III PacKillsMorales 02-04-2006, 04:03 PM who wins in the rubber match, fought at 130, then 135 i tip pac to ko morales again at 130, then ud him at 135 JMCbulls 02-04-2006, 05:34 PM pac at both!!he owns! SuckaPunch 02-04-2006, 05:58 PM You forgot to put 131,132,133 and 134. Morales will try all those four weight limits to beat Pac :D If he can't beat Pac in all those weight limits, then it's really time to retire. Manfredo Jr 02-04-2006, 06:08 PM im a morales fan but i think pac will win again :( SuckaPunch 02-04-2006, 06:18 PM im a morales fan but i think pac will win again :( Pac KO1 Naz in less than 30 seconds. I thought you were gonna pay up since Naz ain't coming back no more. Sn1 02-04-2006, 06:45 PM not many morales backers here anymore. looks like they fell of the proverbial bandwagon. czars_salad 02-05-2006, 03:12 AM pac against morales, again? pac wins in both divisions Sn1 02-05-2006, 02:28 PM morales won the first, pac won the second who's to say the 3rd wont be a different fight again PacKillsMorales 02-12-2006, 08:40 AM not many peeps choosing to vote is there ? the fights still set for september according to boxrec ps: i thought this thread was in non stop boxing..... czars_salad 02-13-2006, 04:12 AM not many peeps choosing to vote is there ? the fights still set for september according to boxrec ps: i thought this thread was in non stop boxing..... everybody knows what pac will do to EM :p AIR_KENG 02-13-2006, 04:19 AM You forgot to put 131,132,133 and 134. Morales will try all those four weight limits to beat Pac :D If he can't beat Pac in all those weight limits, then it's really time to retire. nyahahahahahaha!!! nice one bro... kadyo 02-13-2006, 04:21 AM morales won the first, pac won the second who's to say the 3rd wont be a different fight again logic dictates that! PacKillsMorales 02-16-2006, 04:43 AM ok ok so its unanimous lol..well almost abdiel2k3 02-16-2006, 04:54 AM ok ok so we know u got points u dont have to have a kool billion out just to show us up Lol and ur welcome Sn1 02-16-2006, 04:57 AM ok ok so we know u got points u dont have to have a kool billion out just to show us up Lol and ur welcome lmfao. ive just fallen in love with a boy. damn abdiel your so fine, your so fine you blow my mind. your abdiel, abdiel ...... :p abdiel2k3 02-16-2006, 04:57 AM after rewatchin the 2nd fight its so damn obvious what happened in the 1st fight morales was all about as roy put it "beaten that body" in the 2nd fight he went head hunting and this time around it was manny who was "beaten that body" Sn1 02-16-2006, 05:09 AM after rewatchin the 2nd fight its so damn obvious what happened in the 1st fight morales was all about as roy put it "beaten that body" in the 2nd fight he went head hunting and this time around it was manny who was "beaten that body" i think morales was doin exactly the same thing as in the 1st fight, but pac didnt get cut so was able to sustain enough pressure to weaken morales for the later rds. the overuse of the left in the 1st also came into play as he used a wide variety of shots in the 2nd, including those brutal bodyshots & right hooks abdiel2k3 02-16-2006, 05:13 AM i think morales was doin exactly the same thing as in the 1st fight, but pac didnt get cut so was able to sustain enough pressure to weaken morales for the later rds. the overuse of the left in the 1st also came into play as he used a wide variety of shots in the 2nd, including those brutal bodyshots & right hooks nah it was in one sense the same counterin pac pressuring him but the diff was that in the 1st fight morales body attack prevented pac from being able to "fire up" or take control of the fight second time around morales didnt work the body it allowed pac to use his reserve cuz all them hits to the head didnt do much Sn1 02-16-2006, 05:22 AM nah it was in one sense the same counterin pac pressuring him but the diff was that in the 1st fight morales body attack prevented pac from being able to "fire up" or take control of the fight second time around morales didnt work the body it allowed pac to use his reserve cuz all them hits to the head didnt do much maybe i need to watch the 1st fight again as ive only seen it once. i really think the cut stopped pac more than the bodyshots. saying that, when pac koed morales he was pretty gassed himself, so maybe the bodyshots in the 1st fight were enough to stop pac doing the same thing he did n the 2nd fight. im not sold yet tho czars_salad 02-16-2006, 08:27 AM nah it was in one sense the same counterin pac pressuring him but the diff was that in the 1st fight morales body attack prevented pac from being able to "fire up" or take control of the fight second time around morales didnt work the body it allowed pac to use his reserve cuz all them hits to the head didnt do much his counter punches were of no use. pac can carry his punches while the other way around for morales. period. Sn1 02-16-2006, 08:45 AM i dont think pac can handle morales power as much as peeps think. its more a case of morales not being able to handle pacs pressure as well as launching an effective offensive of his own. IMO pac was in trouble again until morales' legs went around rd 6 or 7. also, when morales threw combos pacquiao stopped, backed up, or threw short, less powerful combos in reply. this for me meant that as long as morales had the stamina to jab going forward the decision was going to be his. if morales legs went because of pacs punches, or for some other reason we will never know. but for the time being i would never count morales out of the rubbermatch |