View Full Version : Titles Dropped From Hopkin - Eastman Contest


borikua
01-18-2005, 03:14 PM
Howard Eastman will not become undisputed middleweight champion even if he beats current kingpin Bernard Hopkins next month, his promoter has revealed.

Londoner Eastman will get a long-awaited shot at Hopkins in Los Angeles on February 19 but after initially announcing the WBA, IBF, WBO and WBC titles would be up for grabs, Mick Hennessy has announced only the latter will be on the line.

Hennessy Sports had said all four belts would be contended, following an announcement by American pay-per-view broadcaster HBO.

"We would like to apologise for this misunderstanding," said Hennessy. "It was never our intention to mislead anybody.

"Our understanding at the time of our announcement was that all the championships would be contested.

"We have since learnt, however, that Bernard Hopkins is only prepared to stake the WBC title he has been mandated to defend.

"If this situation changes we will keep everybody updated.

"This is no way detracts from the fight."

Fans of the Battersea Bomber will agree, as the boxing public's desire to see often meaningless titles ignored in order to see the big fights continues to grow.

Glen Johnson and Antonio Tarver ditched their light-heavyweight belts in December to free themselves from mandatory defences and meet each other to establish the division's true champion - Johnson won the battle of Roy Jones' conquerors on points.

"At the end of the day the two best middleweights in the world are facing each other and that is what counts," said Hennessy.

Hopkins, 40, forced a stoppage of Oscar de la Hoya in their high-profile meeting last year and is looking to cement his position as one of the greatest middleweights of all time - while Eastman (40-1) will be determined to win his first world crown.

The 34-year-old lost controversially on points to William Joppy in 2001 when they met for the vacant WBA title in Las Vegas.

Chups
01-18-2005, 03:26 PM
At least a belt is on the line.

ChicoEscuelaNYC
01-18-2005, 03:26 PM
Wow, that really sucks. I wonder who's behind it. Hopkins?

jabsRstiff
01-18-2005, 03:30 PM
Who cares if no paper titles are at stake ?

Should Eastman beat Hopkins, everyone but the corrupt sanctioning bodies will recognize him as champ.

borikua
01-18-2005, 03:33 PM
Is Hopkins scared? Has he done this b4?

trinidadpr87
01-18-2005, 03:40 PM
Is Hopkins scared? Has he done this b4?
in case he loses he wants to have some left for tito to take. :D j/k

Kimmy
01-18-2005, 04:06 PM
bull****. The reason Hopkins has done this is he has to pay sanctioning fees to the boxing organisations. If only the WBC title is at stake then he only pays the WBC the sanctioning fee, this will mean more money off the top for both Eastman and Hopkins. This is a very intelligent move and i can`t remember it being done before but very very clever. I slaute Hopkins for his guile!

The1God
01-18-2005, 04:07 PM
Who cares if no paper titles are at stake ?

Should Eastman beat Hopkins, everyone but the corrupt sanctioning bodies will recognize him as champ.

The Ring and the fans will determine who the True Champion is. I never excepted Tarver as P4P after Ko-ing RJJ, Klitchko is the best of the top even though he only has one belt. If Eastman KOs B Hopkins, he will be the "Peoples" Champ. These sanctioning bodies are greedy jerk-offs. They are slowly running themselves out of boxing. It will be good for the WBC though, it will be THE recognized belt.

So, if B. Hopkins wins, he retains all the belts, but if somebody beats him, the titles are vacant????

Eyeh8you
01-18-2005, 04:09 PM
in case he loses he wants to have some left for tito to take. :D j/k
He aint gonna lose to this never was. B-Hop mops Tito again. Not enough skill to execute the executioner!

abdiel2k3
01-18-2005, 04:11 PM
its true that belts have become pretty meaningless as of late
but when only one belt is on the line
it doesnt exactly seem to exude confidence from hopkins or his peoples stand point
id rather have him risk them all
or not risk em at all
as in droppen the titles
we all know hes the best anyways

Kimmy
01-18-2005, 04:14 PM
Very true 1God. A situation like this has occured before when Evander Holyfield fought Bert Cooper. Only the WBA and IBF reconized the fight and the WBC did not. They informed HBO that had Cooper beaten Holyfield when the WBC title would have been vacant. So, if Eastman wins he becomes the WBC champ and the other three titles are vacant! Clear cut.

LittleBigMan
01-18-2005, 05:39 PM
Who cares if no paper titles are at stake ?

Should Eastman beat Hopkins, everyone but the corrupt sanctioning bodies will recognize him as champ.

belts mean nothing

MetalVomit
01-18-2005, 06:06 PM
Is Hopkins scared? Has he done this b4?


LOL! No he is not scared, I think you knew that already mr Tito fan. :)