Weapons of Mass Destruction.. :cool:

where are they ?

where are they ?


i think you just took the bait

Do you hold anything against the Bush administration for not finding the Weapons of Mass Destruction, TINO!!?

nope. i m sure they ll soon find it , in fact i suspect there are a lot of weapons of mass destruction in USA , even nuclears bombs !

nope. i m sure they ll soon find it , in fact i suspect there are a lot of weapons of mass destruction in USA , even nuclears bombs !

uh-oh!...let's boycott the french fries!!! :D

uh-oh!...let's boycott the french fries!!! :D


that boycott had to be the stupidest thing EVER as obviously the french fries you eat in KFC or anywhere else are not made in France, obviously.

that boycott had to be the stupidest thing EVER as obviously the french fries you eat in KFC or anywhere else are not made in France, obviously.

KFC, at least the KFC in my area, serves potato wedges, not french fries.

Most Americans realize now that the weapons of mass destruction were never there. But you say something over and over and people start to believe it... Just a year before, Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice were both on camera saying that Iraq had no capability for anything of that nature...

sad thing about it is that both countries relations are in jeopardy in times were western countries better stick together

sad thing about it is that both countries relations are in jeopardy in times were western countries better stick together

becoz...some people in the white house think chirac is a chicken gay for backing out of the coalition...lol! :D

Weapons of Mass Destruction..

The Bush administration would never give out false information. :rolleyes:

Weapons of Mass Destruction..

i don't know about weapons of mass destruction, but John Holmes penis was a weapon of ass destruction

Did they find the weapons of mass destruction yet?

uh-oh!...let's boycott the french fries!!! :D
you mean "freedom fries"?

im just bored and want to see my picture...ignore me

im just bored and want to see my picture...ignore me
im bored and would love to see your picture too :luvbed:

Did they find the weapons of mass destruction yet?

Just for ****s and giggles, I'll link an article of substance:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&e=5&u=/ap/iraq_weapons_hunt

Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq

39 minutes ago Middle East - AP


By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any.

Nor did Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion, but he couldn't rule out some unofficial transfer of limited WMD-related materials.

He closed his effort with words of caution about potential future threats and careful assessment of this and other unanswered questions.

The Bush administration justified its 2003 invasion of Iraq as necessary to eliminate Hussein's purported stockpile of WMD.

"As matters now stand, the WMD investigation has gone as far as feasible," Duelfer wrote in an an addendum to the report he issued last fall. "After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted."

In 92 pages posted online Monday evening, Duelfer provided a final look at an investigation that, at its peak, occupied more than 1,000 military and civilian translators, weapons specialists and other experts. His latest addenda conclude a roughly 1,500-page report released last fall.

Among warnings sprinkled throughout the new documents, one concludes that Saddam's programs created a pool of weapons experts, many of whom will be seeking work. While most will probably turn to the "benign civil sector," the danger remains that "hostile foreign governments, terrorists or insurgents may seek Iraqi expertise."

"Because a single individual can advance certain WMD activities, it remains an important concern," one addendum said.

Another addendum noted that military forces in Iraq may continue to find small numbers of degraded chemical weapons — most likely misplaced or improperly destroyed before 1991. In an insurgent's hands, "the use of a single even ineffectual chemical weapon would likely cause more terror than deadlier conventional explosives," the addendum said.

And still another said the survey group found some potential nuclear-related equipment was "missing from heavily damaged and looted sites." Yet, because of deteriorating security in Iraq, the survey group was unable to determine what happened to the equipment, which also had alternate civilian uses.

"Some of it probably has been sold for its scrap value. Other pieces might have been disassembled" and converted into motors or condensers, an addendum said. "Still others could have been taken intact to preserve their function."

Leaving the door to the investigation open just a crack, a U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said a small team still operates under the U.S.-led multinational force in Iraq, although the survey group officially disbanded earlier this month. Those staying on continue to examine documents and follow up any reports of weapons of mass destruction.

In a statement accompanying the final installment, Duelfer said any surprise discovery would be most likely in the biological weapons area because facilities and other clues would be comparatively small.

Among unanswered questions, Duelfer said a group formed to investigate whether WMD-related material was shipped out of Iraq before the invasion wasn't able to reach firm conclusions because the security situation halted its work. Investigators were focusing on transfers from Iraq to Syria.

The questioning of Iraqis did not produce any information to support the transfer possibility, one addendum said. The Iraq Survey Group believes "it was unlikely that an official transfer of WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. However, ISG was unable to rule out unofficial movement of limited WMD-related materials."

neils, they've found them.

What REALLY bothers me is that the government didn't even BOTHER PLANTING WMDs in Iraq. I mean the Bush Administration can't even lie effectively. What the hell??

Actually, Saddam did have WMD's, but before the invasion they were secretly moved to Iran.

Actually, Saddam did have WMD's, but before the invasion they were secretly moved to Iran.
let me guess, you were with saddam, right?

Actually, Saddam did have WMD's, but before the invasion they were secretly moved to Iran.

How? Iran HATES Saddam almost as much as the Bush family does.

How? Iran HATES Saddam almost as much as the Bush family does.


Don't believe the hype. It may seem that way on the surface, but in reality, it isn't.

Don't believe the hype. It may seem that way on the surface, but in reality, it isn't.

Okay, so even though Saddam launched chemical weapons at the Iranian people and killed MANY of them, they are still best buds? That doesn't sound realistic to me.

Also, the Iranian-Iraqi border is gaurded like the Israel Palestine border.

Okay, so even though Saddam launched chemical weapons at the Iranian people and killed MANY of them, they are still best buds? That doesn't sound realistic to me.

Also, the Iranian-Iraqi border is gaurded like the Israel Palestine border.


Yeah right. Like when Iran allowed the Iraqi's to land their planes in Iran during the first Gulf War.

Yeah right. Like when Iran allowed the Iraqi's to land their planes in Iran during the first Gulf War.

Really? Let me look this up. If this fact is true I will concede.

Yeah right. Like when Iran allowed the Iraqi's to land their planes in Iran during the first Gulf War.

Do you have an article which confirms this?

Do you have an article which confirms this?


You never heard of this? You could search the net to find this out. Reason they fled is because they were being shot down by coalition forces.

You never heard of this? You could search the net to find this out. Reason they fled is because they were being shot down by coalition forces.

They fled. Yes, that I heard of. The way you said it, it sounded like Iran was allowing the Iraqis strategic use of their airbases.

Harboring fleeing Iraqis is different. That doesn't mean Iran will accept Saddam's gifts of chemical weapons. Especially considering those are the same chemical weapons that Saddam used on them in the 1980s.