View Full Version : Anorak banned
The Noose 10-09-2005, 09:20 PM Maybe everyone already knows.
Maybe no one really cares.
Just thought id let you know, he's been banned.
Probably for the Santino thread.
I guess the Gods are taking **** talking seriously.
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:21 PM lol well thats one way to end the fighting with them
{BrownBomber} 10-09-2005, 09:25 PM Damn the new mods are really cutting down on the crap. I like Anorak but i dont know what he said to get him banned.Im sure the mods got this **** on lock down.In this corner got banned also.Can anyone tell me why?
Memorex 10-09-2005, 09:26 PM nobody should be banned, this is just a freaking internet forum. ppl are so sensitive
jack_the_rippuh 10-09-2005, 09:26 PM He's been banned before.
He'll be back...hopefully.
The thing is, I'm cool with him & Santino.
I wish we could all just get along.
He seemed to also have a beef with Neils, I was cool with them both.
Brown Bomber divirginized me.
Why hasn't he been banned?
The Noose 10-09-2005, 09:29 PM Somone must have seriously complained to the mods about the Santino thread.
Maybe asking people if they could beat up Santino qualifies as inciting physical violence??
Maybe its a step up from just name calling?
Also with the photo of Santino posted up, who knows what crazy bastards are looking?
{BrownBomber} 10-09-2005, 09:31 PM Before the mods have to take time to read and answer your question I will answer for em'.
This is my job mayng!Thats what I do!
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 09:36 PM He told me to die....
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:37 PM i didnt know anorak but this is good for the forum the fighting needs to stop a joke is a joke
The Noose 10-09-2005, 09:41 PM Hs Santino ever been banned?
AgonYx0 10-09-2005, 09:43 PM Damn the new mods are really cutting down on the crap. I like Anorak but i dont know what he said to get him banned.Im sure the mods got this **** on lock down.In this corner got banned also.Can anyone tell me why?
who are the new mods???
jack_the_rippuh 10-09-2005, 09:47 PM Sonny(Santino) has never been banned, atleast I don't think he has.
Anorak was funny to me, I liked the guy.
On a side note, though..
You can tell the person in this picture would kill for some crackers to go with all this cheese..
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:47 PM i dont get it people talk spit to blits,exig,ect, all you guys are cool to me what the hell
jack_the_rippuh 10-09-2005, 09:48 PM WTF MAN!?
That's freaking gay!
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:53 PM what im sayin is wtf people fighting over
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:53 PM that was sick man
Tony Blitz 10-09-2005, 09:54 PM i dont get it people talk spit to blits,exig,ect, all you guys are cool to me what the hell
What the hell is talking spit? :lol1:
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:56 PM na man i just seen your name pop up in the thunderdome before
BIGPOPPAPUMP 10-09-2005, 09:56 PM Anorak was banned because he has been attacking members over and over. He takes thing to extremes like creating images with pictures of the people he bashes with profanity laced all over them. This is not the first time that he was banned. After the Santino thread was locked (created in the lounge I may add), he then went to create a thread attacking Rodgers (also in the lounge) and then he was banned. InThisCorner was banned for making a racist remark towards an asian forum user.
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 09:57 PM Yes, I've totally stopped my flaming. I want peace with everyone. No lie.
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 09:58 PM i just dont want them to shut down the forum over all the tuff talk
sisforshaq 10-09-2005, 10:02 PM So many people banned. What is this world coming to?
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 10:03 PM Dats my fear..... this is a COOL booty forum even with the flaming. This is also the most active boxing forum too.
Rick has a goldmine with this site and this forum just increases its appeal.
i just dont want them to shut down the forum over all the tuff talk
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 10:05 PM Dats my fear..... this is a COOL booty forum even with the flaming. This is also the most active boxing forum too.
Rick has a goldmine with this site and this forum just increases its appeal.
thats just it i get along with you why people always fighting with you
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 10:08 PM Im rude sometimes and my sarcasm can be annoying. I bash fighters I hate. Thats one thing I noticed, all my feuds are with Wlad/Vitali lovers (Pbds/Enayze/Santino/LeoPadun/Torino...).
thats just it i get along with you why people always fighting with you
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 10:10 PM Im rude sometimes and my sarcasm can be annoying. I bash fighters I hate. Thats one thing I noticed, all my feuds are with Wlad/Vitali lovers (Pbds/Enayze/Santino/LeoPadun/Torino...).
ok i get it me to ...sarcasm never works in type .its hard to joke with people
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 10:12 PM exactly, especially with people who take themselves and this board too seriously.
ok i get it me to ...sarcasm never works in type .its hard to joke with people
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 10:13 PM exactly, especially with people who take themselves and this board too seriously.
true if you dont agree with me cool ill get over it
Enayze 10-09-2005, 10:20 PM nobody should be banned, this is just a freaking internet forum. ppl are so sensitive
I agree lol. Theyre treating this as some type of government place.
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 10:27 PM i dont think people need to be banned. well 666boy666 did and was.
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 10:30 PM how was 666 bad?
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 10:36 PM the bush got shot thread in the thunderdome look it up he was a smart ass to all of us telling him he cant do that
badblood 10-09-2005, 10:48 PM Seriously guys, this trolling **** is getting out of hand.
BLOODSHED 10-09-2005, 10:49 PM I dont like Bush at ALL but that was not funny in the SLIGHTEST!
the bush got shot thread in the thunderdome look it up he was a smart ass to all of us telling him he cant do that
Memorex 10-09-2005, 10:51 PM Seriously guys, this trolling **** is getting out of hand.
http://www.flickeringmoon.net/troll.jpg
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 11:13 PM http://www.flickeringmoon.net/troll.jpg
lol ....hell i dont like bush but if you do that you know you will be banned.lets just end the sht and get over it.if you dont like someone dont rep post or read his or her threads
Atwa_66 10-09-2005, 11:19 PM Somone must have seriously complained to the mods about the Santino thread.
Maybe asking people if they could beat up Santino qualifies as inciting physical violence??
Maybe its a step up from just name calling?
Also with the photo of Santino posted up, who knows what crazy bastards are looking?
That has definitely been done before, and people haven't been banned
I have flamed, and fought with every person on this board literally
And I have not been banned one time, I don't know whats going on
I think everyone needs to relax, and the noobs, need to get out
THE REAL NINJA 10-09-2005, 11:34 PM sorry im a noob atwa..... but can i stay?
masterdirector 10-10-2005, 12:14 AM Now I'm definitely for Sonny to be made Mod. I'd be happy if he was the only mod. That way I could be natural. I'm not happy with all this Bush Administration that's taken over.
Mick Hucknall 10-10-2005, 11:55 AM Bring Anorak back. the guys the legend of comedy on this sight and it sucks not having him around
Truth 10-10-2005, 12:04 PM I hope Anorak gets braught back, I thought he was a good poster most of the time.
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 12:06 PM Bring Anorak back. the guys the legend of comedy on this sight and it sucks not having him around
I second that. Some of the guys post were very humourous and typical Anorak threads.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 12:12 PM I'm tired of his sarcasm and dumb topics of threads.
Bring Anorak back. the guys the legend of comedy on this sight and it sucks not having him around
Martin (Top Knowledge) 10-10-2005, 12:46 PM Yeah Anorak was a funny guy... I wonder when we'll see him next? :eek:
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 01:05 PM I'm tired of his sarcasm and dumb topics of threads.
May well be a British sense of humour thing. Does not translate well across the pond, I guess.
Parodius 10-10-2005, 01:08 PM Anorak should not be banned. He is one funny dude, he created one of the the best threads in the lounge, the one with Shemale pictures. I love the stuff he does with the different pics. He just jokes around alot.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 01:13 PM Who called him racist?
Anorak should not be banned. He is one funny dude, he created one of the the best threads in the lounge, the one with Shemale pictures. I love the stuff he does with the different pics. I don't think he's racist, he just jokes around.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 01:14 PM Umm it wasnt british humor. I mean he cursed as me non stop in pms as of late and I havent spoken of his name in any bad light as of late. I just offered him suggestions to his posts by pm.
May well be a British sense of humour thing. Does not translate well across the pond, I guess.
Parodius 10-10-2005, 01:21 PM Who called him racist?I thought that was the reason he was banned or was it something else??? I see it was for something else, I was thinking of IN THIS CORNER.
AgonYx0 10-10-2005, 01:24 PM rick should let him come back.
EXIGE 10-10-2005, 01:44 PM Umm it wasnt british humor. I mean he cursed as me non stop in pms as of late and I havent spoken of his name in any bad light as of late. I just offered him suggestions to his posts by pm.
Hahahaha, how ironic....
tracylee 10-10-2005, 01:49 PM Maybe everyone already knows.
Maybe no one really cares.
Just thought id let you know, he's been banned.
Probably for the Santino thread.
I guess the Gods are taking **** talking seriously.
banned? what for? what did he do that was worse than anybody else??? thats the same question that pops into my mind every time somebody is banned. :confused:
tracylee 10-10-2005, 01:52 PM Anorak was banned because he has been attacking members over and over. He takes thing to extremes like creating images with pictures of the people he bashes with profanity laced all over them. This is not the first time that he was banned. After the Santino thread was locked (created in the lounge I may add), he then went to create a thread attacking Rodgers (also in the lounge) and then he was banned. InThisCorner was banned for making a racist remark towards an asian forum user.
Okay, fair enough. But, have you not seen all the other crap others have been getting away with for mo's?? How do you decide who can get away with attacking everyone and everything and who cant...whats the critera?
- Evil - 10-10-2005, 02:06 PM This is ****ing gay, Anorak was a very good member.
Like him or not he made the forums interesting. They should allow him back ASAP.
BIGPOPPAPUMP 10-10-2005, 02:14 PM This is ****ing gay, Anorak was a very good member.
Like him or not he made the forums interesting. They should allow him back ASAP.
This is why people never get banned. Every time someone gets banned, you have someone that needs to start a thread about it and then you have people crying about the person getting banned. I should point out the dozens of posts where he wished death upon Neils' relatives and telling him to, and I quote, "**** his filthy whore of a mother".
tracylee 10-10-2005, 02:18 PM This is why people never get banned. Every time someone gets banned, you have someone that needs to start a thread about it and then you have people crying about the person getting banned. I should point out the dozens of posts where he wished death upon Neils' relatives and telling him to, and I quote, "**** his filthy whore of a mother".
for the record, I'm not crying over anorak getting banned...I'm just aware that the banning seems mighty selective..what some can do any and all the time, others get canned for . :confused: I think we've got the right to ask questions about that. You know, so much of the flaming is 'missed' that when those that were flamed fight back, they appear to be starting trouble, which is not the case.
As for that quote of his, I've had much worse said to me by long time posters....and that was okay.
jack_the_rippuh 10-10-2005, 02:19 PM I smell something..
:sniff: :sniff:...
....IT SMELLS LIKE.................
...ABUSE OF POWER!
YEAH, THAT'S IT!
Sir_Jose 10-10-2005, 02:21 PM You cant ban one member for something that other members do openly. You either ban everyone or you ban no one. Calling Neils mother a "Filthy Whore" is nothing compared to some of the stuff that has happend on this website. For example racism, gay bashing, trolling etc is either tolerated or not. That where the stand needs to be made its one or the other. You cant have one guy doing the same exact thing as another and only ban one.
Who cares if people cry about it. If they dont like it they can leave, **** em.
masterdirector 10-10-2005, 02:21 PM This is why people never get banned. Every time someone gets banned, you have someone that needs to start a thread about it and then you have people crying about the person getting banned. I should point out the dozens of posts where he wished death upon Neils' relatives and telling him to, and I quote, "**** his filthy whore of a mother".
You shouldn't ban anybody.
And I find it disrespectful for you to ban me without even a warning or anything. I didn't do anything to you. People have an ignore button they can use. I've used it when someone bothered me too much. Granted, it was just b/c they had an avatar I didn't want to see.
I'm against anybody being banned. Unless they're trying to screw up the boards.
masterdirector 10-10-2005, 02:24 PM I see nothing wrong with gay bashing personally. racism I do. trolling, I don't know what that is.
people do take things a bit too seriously on forums though. get some thicker skin. this is supposed to be a place where we can say what we want where we couldn't necessarily say them so openly in real life. I have to censor myself enough in real life, I hate having to come on here and do it.
Sir_Jose 10-10-2005, 02:26 PM I see nothing wrong with gay bashing personally. racism I do. trolling, I don't know what that is.
people do take things a bit too seriously on forums though. get some thicker skin. this is supposed to be a place where we can say what we want where we couldn't necessarily say them so openly in real life. I have to censor myself enough in real life, I hate having to come on here and do it.
Thats just stupid.
jack_the_rippuh 10-10-2005, 02:26 PM You cant ban one member for something that other members do openly. You either ban everyone or you ban no one. Calling Neils mother a "Filthy Whore" is nothing compared to some of the stuff that has happend on this website. For example racism, gay bashing, trolling etc is either tolerated or not. That where the stand needs to be made its one or the other. You cant have one guy doing the same exact thing as another and only ban one.
Who cares if people cry about it. If they dont like it they can leave, **** em.
There's always someone who has to be an example, so you gotta understand.
I liked the way Rick use to do stuff.
Examples of people who needed to be banned and got banned : Eyeh8you, Technine, etc.
Examples of people who didn't need to be banned and got banned: Eden, etc. (I really don't see what's so bad about an I'm leaving thread, it's not like it motivates other users to leave or anything.)
Example of someone who needed to get banned, but didn't: Nicht (What's the story behind him not being banned, anyway? Was it because he donated money to the site?)
BIGPOPPAPUMP 10-10-2005, 02:27 PM You cant ban one member for something that other members do openly. You either ban everyone or you ban no one. Calling Neils mother a "Filthy Whore" is nothing compared to some of the stuff that has happend on this website. For example racism, gay bashing, trolling etc is either tolerated or not. That where the stand needs to be made its one or the other. You cant have one guy doing the same exact thing as another and only ban one.
Who cares if people cry about it. If they dont like it they can leave, **** em.
That could be why 27 members have been banned within the last two weeks. That is more people banned than in the last 8 months.
Not everyone was important to start a thread about and not everyone was given a second chance. People have been banned for trolling and racism, regardless of post count, 5 in the last few days.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:29 PM I just realized Mike Tyson Jr was banned. I guess he was the same person as Anorak.... funny. I was cool with Mike Tyson Jr.
jabsRstiff 10-10-2005, 02:30 PM There's always someone who has to be an example, so you gotta understand.
I liked the way Rick use to do stuff.
Examples of people who needed to be banned and got banned : Eyeh8you, Technine, etc.
Examples of people who didn't need to be banned and got banned: Eden, etc. (I really don't see what's so bad about an I'm leaving thread, it's not like it motivates other users to leave or anything.)
Example of someone who needed to get banned, but didn't: Nicht (What's the story behind him not being banned, anyway? Was it because he donated money to the site?)
Very good post/points.
Maybe the admins on here are Klitschko fans....like those posters you cited, Jack, who were never banned ?
Sir_Jose 10-10-2005, 02:31 PM That could be why 27 members have been banned within the last two weeks. That is more people banned than in the last 8 months.
Not everyone was important to start a thread about and not everyone was given a second chance. People have been banned for trolling and racism, regardless of post count, 5 in the last few days.
Like I said you either ban EVERYBODY or you ban nobody. Please dont for a second try and tell me thats whats been happening. Ive been here far to long to know that.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:31 PM Thats ashame!
And the whole post Anorak created about the stinch of Max Schemlings corpse is WAY overboard. I dont think bringing him back would be good.
This is why people never get banned. Every time someone gets banned, you have someone that needs to start a thread about it and then you have people crying about the person getting banned. I should point out the dozens of posts where he wished death upon Neils' relatives and telling him to, and I quote, "**** his filthy whore of a mother".
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:32 PM Like I was saying, I disagreed with you but I didnt ask for your banning for disagreeeing with you like some people probably did.
You shouldn't ban anybody.
And I find it disrespectful for you to ban me without even a warning or anything. I didn't do anything to you. People have an ignore button they can use. I've used it when someone bothered me too much. Granted, it was just b/c they had an avatar I didn't want to see.
I'm against anybody being banned. Unless they're trying to screw up the boards.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:34 PM Jabs, all my run ins have been with Klitschko fans. No lie.
Very good post/points.
Maybe the admins on here are Klitschko fans....like those posters you cited, Jack, who were never banned ?
I have a question. Why is it......there are like ten or more polesmokers on this site that have full video clips in their signature, and spam the boards daily.
Yet I had one in mine, and it got deleted.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:36 PM The source of our links isnt this site's gallery. The rules say you cant have a video clip/gif from our site's gallery.
I have a question. Why is it......there are like ten or more polesmokers on this site that have full video clips in their signature, and spam the boards daily.
Yet I had one in mine, and it got deleted.
jabsRstiff 10-10-2005, 02:36 PM Jabs, all my run ins have been with Klitschko fans. No lie.
Gotta love 'em. We just had a rematch (with controversy) of the best fight in years, which ended with a thundering KO...& they only can post in the "Viatli Is the Toughest, etc." thread.
Most of them, are not boxing fans. Just Klit fans.
EXIGE 10-10-2005, 02:37 PM I say bring him back.
Xcaret was a blatent racist, and no1 banned him. Unban Anorak, and keep continuity....
No double standards. Because double standards are just as bad as the stuff people are being banned for....
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:38 PM Its like me with them, I'm going to speak my mind. I dont hate Vitali. I hate Wlad. But nuthuggers turn you against the fighter you have respect for. Corrales was easily in my top 3 favorite fighters, but people on this board were acting like he had no flaws. So I switched and went with Castillo cause of all the nuthuggers. Won 40 mill on here and 25 bucks in real life.
Gotta love 'em. We just had a rematch (with controversy) of the best fight in years, which ended with a thundering KO...& they only can post in the "Viatli Is the Toughest, etc." thread.
Most of them, are not boxing fans. Just Klit fans.
EXIGE 10-10-2005, 02:43 PM Its like me with them, I'm going to speak my mind. I dont hate Vitali. I hate Wlad. But nuthuggers turn you against the fighter you have respect for. Corrales was easily in my top 3 favorite fighters, but people on this board were acting like he had no flaws. So I switched and went with Castillo cause of all the nuthuggers. Won 40 mill on here and 25 bucks in real life.
Thats a fair point....
EXIGE 10-10-2005, 02:45 PM Like I said you either ban EVERYBODY or you ban nobody. Please dont for a second try and tell me thats whats been happening. Ive been here far to long to know that.
Which would bring me onto my next point....
Check it out > Idea that could work, if you ask me..... (http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49182)
^^By the sounds of the reaction the admin is getting. This wouldnt be bad at all.....
BIGPOPPAPUMP 10-10-2005, 02:52 PM Like I said you either ban EVERYBODY or you ban nobody. Please dont for a second try and tell me thats whats been happening. Ive been here far to long to know that.
You have no idea what's happening. The entire site is being revamped. Me and two other guys are running the forums, Rick is not going to be dealing with them at all. After the site was in a bidding war for a major newspaper writer who turned down the offer after "someone" who was biiding as well, pointing out the **** in the galleries and type of mess the forums had become, the writer turned the site down. Rick was so pissed off when that happened that he told me to ban everyone and anyone.
The writing staff will be run in full by Sammy Rozenberg, who just came on board full time after retiring from the Associated Press. Another writer is coming on board to manage the site. Rick is working on various projects with Fox Sports and will rarely be around.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 02:56 PM Wow! All I have to say is WOW. Some posters **** got you guys turned down. WOW.
PS: I have a pretty good guestimate who that 'someone' is and that someone's initals are probably DF.
You have no idea what's happening. The entire site is being revamped. Me and two other guys are running the forums, Rick is not going to be dealing with them at all. After the site was in a bidding war for a major newspaper writer who turned down the offer after "someone" who was biiding as well, pointing out the **** in the galleries and type of mess the forums had become, the writer turned the site down. Rick was so pissed off when that happened that he told me to ban everyone and anyone.
The writing staff will be run in full by Sammy Rozenberg, who just came on board full time after retiring from the Associated Press. Another writer is coming on board to manage the site. Rick is working on various projects with Fox Sports and will rarely be around.
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 02:57 PM You have no idea what's happening. The entire site is being revamped. Me and two other guys are running the forums, Rick is not going to be dealing with them at all. After the site was in a bidding war for a major newspaper writer who turned down the offer after "someone" who was biiding as well, pointing out the **** in the galleries and type of mess the forums had become, the writer turned the site down. Rick was so pissed off when that happened that he told me to ban everyone and anyone.
The writing staff will be run in full by Sammy Rozenberg, who just came on board full time after retiring from the Associated Press. Another writer is coming on board to manage the site. Rick is working on various projects with Fox Sports and will rarely be around.
This makes a lot of sense. The forums are public. You dont need to sign or open an account to view the threads posted. Therefore, it is natural you clamp down on the ****o stuff, which is getting way out of hand. This will also attract more women members, which can only be good.
badblood 10-10-2005, 02:58 PM Just dont change the site, because this board is near perfect. :cool: The only thing I would suggest is getting rid of some of the trolls in this place.
jabsRstiff 10-10-2005, 02:59 PM The ****o stuff is posted mostly by one particular poster.
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 03:03 PM Just dont change the site, because this board is near perfect. :cool: The only thing I would suggest is getting rid of some of the trolls in this place.
Too much ****o, badblood. That has to be clamped down, and rightly so.
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 03:03 PM The ****o stuff is posted mostly by one particular poster.
Who is it?
masterdirector 10-10-2005, 03:04 PM You have no idea what's happening. The entire site is being revamped. Me and two other guys are running the forums, Rick is not going to be dealing with them at all. After the site was in a bidding war for a major newspaper writer who turned down the offer after "someone" who was biiding as well, pointing out the **** in the galleries and type of mess the forums had become, the writer turned the site down. Rick was so pissed off when that happened that he told me to ban everyone and anyone.
The writing staff will be run in full by Sammy Rozenberg, who just came on board full time after retiring from the Associated Press. Another writer is coming on board to manage the site. Rick is working on various projects with Fox Sports and will rarely be around.
And that's one reason its unfair to ban people without warning. There has been no obvious announcement made about this as far as I've seen. So everyone has been doing everything as usual and 27 people got banned, me being one of them. Had I been told things were changing, I would've toned down. I was going along with the status quo, and BANG, I was f'n banned for nothing. No warning or anything. I'm sure many others were surprised too.
EXIGE 10-10-2005, 03:04 PM Too much ****o, badblood. That has to be clamped down, and rightly so.
Your the type of guy who would give a "blow-job boo" arent you.
"Ohh i totally disagree with sexism, it is really wrong, and i promote womens rights. Now can i have a blow job"
:o
tracylee 10-10-2005, 03:05 PM I see nothing wrong with gay bashing personally. racism I do. trolling, I don't know what that is.
people do take things a bit too seriously on forums though. get some thicker skin. this is supposed to be a place where we can say what we want where we couldn't necessarily say them so openly in real life. I have to censor myself enough in real life, I hate having to come on here and do it.
theres plenty wrong with gay bashing...for one thing, this is not the place for it. For another, you hate gay people...thats your problem. What on earth makes you think all of us want to see that hatred plastered all over the forum? Most of us that know were straight arent uncomfortable with gays to the point that bashing them and making their life at the site pure hell is what we do. Most of us simply dont care..why do you? Who are you to judge anybody, by the way?
I dont consider myself any better than anyone else..gay or not.
BIGPOPPAPUMP 10-10-2005, 03:06 PM Wow! All I have to say is WOW. Some posters **** got you guys turned down. WOW.
PS: I have a pretty good guestimate who that 'someone' is and that someone's initals are probably DF.
If you are a respectable print writer, known all over the industry, would you want to come to a place where your rep may get tarnished by **** and racism? Hell no. That "someone" is someone that was bidding against us.
EXIGE 10-10-2005, 03:08 PM If you are a respectable print writer, known all over the industry, would you want to come to a place where your rep may get tarnished by **** and racism? Hell no. That "someone" is someone that was bidding against us.
Is this place on the Dow Jones and "Footsie" 100 or something lol!
Bidding and all that.... :rolleyes:
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 03:13 PM Your the type of guy who would give a "blow-job boo" arent you.
"Ohh i totally disagree with sexism, it is really wrong, and i promote womens rights. Now can i have a blow job"
:o
What! What! Outragous comment.
But seriously, the mods have every right to ban ****o on these boards. I will support it.
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 03:16 PM And that's one reason its unfair to ban people without warning. There has been no obvious announcement made about this as far as I've seen. So everyone has been doing everything as usual and 27 people got banned, me being one of them. Had I been told things were changing, I would've toned down. I was going along with the status quo, and BANG, I was f'n banned for nothing. No warning or anything. I'm sure many others were surprised too.
That is something I also mentioned in a post previously. There should be a annoucement thread started by the Mods clearning stating the dos and donts. This thread should be put right on top of the lounge so everyone can read it.
Lol999 10-10-2005, 03:18 PM Yeah, forum rules and guidelines need to be established and published. At the moment ignorance is a partial defence and that subjectiveness needs to be removed. It appears that BS is remarketing itself and we as forum members need to be made aware so that we can effectively support it's transition.
Lol
masterdirector 10-10-2005, 03:40 PM theres plenty wrong with gay bashing...for one thing, this is not the place for it. For another, you hate gay people...thats your problem. What on earth makes you think all of us want to see that hatred plastered all over the forum? Most of us that know were straight arent uncomfortable with gays to the point that bashing them and making their life at the site pure hell is what we do. Most of us simply dont care..why do you? Who are you to judge anybody, by the way?
I dont consider myself any better than anyone else..gay or not.
whatever, back on ignore for you lady.
see how easy it is to use the ignore feature? You see some complete fake sheep hypocrite of a person and you ignore them. Simple as that. :cool:
SonnyG8R 10-10-2005, 03:42 PM If you are a respectable print writer, known all over the industry, would you want to come to a place where your rep may get tarnished by **** and racism? Hell no. That "someone" is someone that was bidding against us.
FTR I think Banning anorak was appropriate because 1. He made that thread about Schmellings courps. 2. All the flaming and name calling amied at Neils 3. Making 3 or 4 different threads about me and few others spewing pure hate, doctoring photos to make them say"I love sucking ****" etc.
That shouldn't be tolerated.
I have already gone on record as saying that this site might be better off going to a paid membership format, even though I prefer it being free of course.
Here is a recommendation regarding banning: Give people in danger of being banned a warning first. If they persist ban them for a minimum of 6 weeks. These 24 hour bans don't seem to be accomplishing much. Then if the person continues after coming back from the 6 week ban, make the ban permanent.
This place used to be so great and still is with the exception of people like Anorak, Tony Blitz and a few others who spend all day on this site trolling and flaming.
masterdirector 10-10-2005, 03:45 PM if this site becomes a pay site, i'm out. I won't be on a site with rules and pay. if there aren't rules, the stories get better, they start getting videos, okay. But just to talk on a forum? I'm not paying for that, nobody should.
tracylee 10-10-2005, 03:49 PM whatever, back on ignore for you lady.
see how easy it is to use the ignore feature? You see some complete fake sheep hypocrite of a person and you ignore them. Simple as that. :cool:
hahahahahahahah...oops, wait, I'm supposed to be crushed that I'm being ignored by a hater! I'll work on that.
tracylee 10-10-2005, 03:50 PM FTR I think Banning anorak was appropriate because 1. He made that thread about Schmellings courps. 2. All the flaming and name calling amied at Neils 3. Making 3 or 4 different threads about me and few others spewing pure hate, doctoring photos to make them say"I love sucking ****" etc.
That shouldn't be tolerated.
I have already gone on record as saying that this site might be better off going to a paid membership format, even though I prefer it being free of course.
Here is a recommendation regarding banning: Give people in danger of being banned a warning first. If they persist ban them for a minimum of 6 weeks. These 24 hour bans don't seem to be accomplishing much. Then if the person continues after coming back from the 6 week ban, make the ban permanent.
This place used to be so great and still is with the exception of people like Anorak, Tony Blitz and a few others who spend all day on this site trolling and flaming.
wait, wasnt he banned in the past about the schmelling thing? so thats over and done with right?
Tony Blitz 10-10-2005, 03:50 PM This place used to be so great and still is with the exception of people like Anorak, Tony Blitz and a few others who spend all day on this site trolling and flaming.
Last person I ever flamed was Rodgers which was about a month ago which we've cleared up, you're just using my name because you want the people you hate banned. Would you really want me to complain about the unfair karma squad you have going on? No, so shut your mouth and stop complaining, if you're going to flame someone for no particular reason don't expect them to not say anything back about it.
medium-deek 10-10-2005, 03:51 PM theres plenty wrong with gay bashing...for one thing, this is not the place for it. For another, you hate gay people...thats your problem. What on earth makes you think all of us want to see that hatred plastered all over the forum? Most of us that know were straight arent uncomfortable with gays to the point that bashing them and making their life at the site pure hell is what we do. Most of us simply dont care..why do you? Who are you to judge anybody, by the way?
I dont consider myself any better than anyone else..gay or not.
Karma for that.
BLOODSHED 10-10-2005, 03:51 PM I have to agree. I just cant figure out how he'd hate me so much when I havent cursed at him once.
FTR I think Banning anorak was appropriate because 1. He made that thread about Schmellings courps. 2. All the flaming and name calling amied at Neils 3. Making 3 or 4 different threads about me and few others spewing pure hate, doctoring photos to make them say"I love sucking ****" etc.
That shouldn't be tolerated.
I have already gone on record as saying that this site might be better off going to a paid membership format, even though I prefer it being free of course.
Here is a recommendation regarding banning: Give people in danger of being banned a warning first. If they persist ban them for a minimum of 6 weeks. These 24 hour bans don't seem to be accomplishing much. Then if the person continues after coming back from the 6 week ban, make the ban permanent.
This place used to be so great and still is with the exception of people like Anorak, Tony Blitz and a few others who spend all day on this site trolling and flaming.
Yeah, forum rules and guidelines need to be established and published. At the moment ignorance is a partial defence and that subjectiveness needs to be removed. It appears that BS is remarketing itself and we as forum members need to be made aware so that we can effectively support it's transition.
Lol
....Lol999 for President or Prime Minister or something with some power!!!! Good post :)
SonnyG8R 10-10-2005, 04:00 PM wait, wasnt he banned in the past about the schmelling thing? so thats over and done with right?
Yes. He is now what is called a repeat offender.
tracylee 10-10-2005, 04:08 PM Yes. He is now what is called a repeat offender.
he actually made another thread about schmelling? :eek:
SonnyG8R 10-10-2005, 04:08 PM ....Lol999 for President or Prime Minister or something with some power!!!! Good post :)
Hey man appearantly Tony Blitz received bad karma from you and S****** and Is now convinced that i must have put you 2 up to it.
Please answer honestly, did I ask you to hit him with bad karma?
S****** same question to you.
SonnyG8R 10-10-2005, 04:09 PM he actually made another thread about schmelling? :eek:
No but he didn't get the message to clean up his act. ;)
tracylee 10-10-2005, 04:10 PM No but he didn't get the message to clean up his act. ;)
but theyre two different issues. he paid his dues..did his time for the schmelling thread. anyway...... :confused:
Tony Blitz 10-10-2005, 04:12 PM Hey man appearantly Tony Blitz received bad karma from you and S****** and Is now convinced that i must have put you 2 up to it.
Please answer honestly, did I ask you to hit him with bad karma?
S****** same question to you.
I'm sure they're going to say "yes you did"
Leave it alone, if you don't like me don't post to me, quit trolling on me.
SonnyG8R 10-10-2005, 04:14 PM lol, Tony ***** just gave me bad karma with the following comment:
Your wife's an old hag, you were a nobody your whole life and your life has passed you by, aren't you depressed? You should think of suicide, being ugly doesn't help with life either
Perhaps I should cry about it like he does. Or maybe I'll just ignore his retarded ass.
Tony Blitz 10-10-2005, 04:16 PM lol, Tony ***** just gave me bad karma with the following comment:
Perhaps I should cry about it like he does. Or maybe I'll just ignore his retarded ass.
This was after you gave me bad karma for this post with the comment "Tony *****"
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=944445&postcount=8
Still trying to insult me again? Aren't you like what, 40? I'm surprised you haven't matured yet
The Noose 10-10-2005, 04:17 PM Whats funny is pbds (i think) bad k'd me, saying it was for the "old school" lol. He joined ONE MONTH before i did! lol
I aint trying to start nuthin, just thought that was amusing.
Im full of love and donuts.
TONY, WHAT THE **** IS WITH THAT SIG?? Messed up!!
The Missing Lin 10-10-2005, 04:17 PM Seems like an agruement happens in almost every thread these days. :(
SonnyG8R 10-10-2005, 04:18 PM but theyre two different issues. he paid his dues..did his time for the schmelling thread. anyway...... :confused:
Yes, but then he came back and repeatedly broke the rules.
You're entitled to your opinion sweety. We've discussed this through pm's (as disagreements should be handled) and we disagree on this issue. No biggie. life would be pretty boring if we all agreed on everything. ;)
Tony Blitz 10-10-2005, 04:18 PM TONY, WHAT THE **** IS WITH THAT SIG?? Messed up!!
Creepy huh? :D
I'm sure they're going to say "yes you did"
Leave it alone, if you don't like me don't post to me, quit trolling on me.
...Blitz, I hit you with bad Karma because you were starting to get on my nerves. Conspiracy theories of Karma hit squads and death camps and other crazy mess. Did I hit you partially for trash talking Sonny? Yep!! Did he ask me to hit you or even know that I was hitting you. Nope! First time I ever hit you with bad K and prior to that it was all good.
BIGPOPPAPUMP 10-10-2005, 04:20 PM This thread has had its run.
|