View Full Version : Antonio Tarver: Was He Ever That Great?


Truth
12-19-2004, 08:57 AM
I think Antonio Tarver is nothing more than a good lightheavyweight with charisma and a big mouth. I don't think he was ever that great though, I think people went overboard when he beat a Roy Jones. This is why he beat Jones:

A.) his style and rangy southpaw stance makes him hard to hit for Roy Jones.

B.)Roy doesn't have the reflexes anymore so Tarver being a good counter puncher just waited to hit Jones on his chin(jones always had a bad chin, its just no one ever exposed it until Tarver)

Bottomline in my opinion is that Tarver's style is just a bad style for Roy Jones, but against someone else Tarver's nothing more than average. Look at last night Johnson didn't have a glass jaw and he took Tarvers best shots, I don't think Tarver hits as hard as people say. When Roy beat Tarver the first time he should have never gave him a rematch because Tarver's style is all wrong for R.J. My point is that against other opposition Tarver's nothing more that a good/average lightheavweight with a big mouth.

http://espn.starwave.com/media/boxing/2004/1218/photo/a_johnson_ft.jpg

jack_the_rippuh
12-19-2004, 09:38 AM
People were going to question Roy's greatness if he never gave Tarver a rematch. Tarver was going to hunt him down into retirement.

Truth
12-19-2004, 09:41 AM
People were going to question Roy's greatness if he never gave Tarver a rematch. Tarver was going to hunt him down into retirement.

your right

Truth
12-19-2004, 09:42 AM
Tarver would have never stopped talking if Roy didn't give him that rematch.

jack_the_rippuh
12-19-2004, 09:59 AM
Johnson sure made him look mediocre last night...It's kind of the same with how people said Roy Jones Jr. fought nothing but stiffs his whole career. I mean I don't think they were all A-class fighters, but alot of times, if someone isn't established, you fight them and deliver a dominating performance...they're going to say the person was never good.

DLT
12-19-2004, 10:46 AM
I've been trying to tell guys the whole time that Tarver and Johnson are solid fighters but nothing special and they are just living off of wins over a washed up RJ

Tyson_Bit_Holyfields_Ear
12-19-2004, 10:57 AM
No he wasn't. He's Vernon Forrest.

DLT
12-19-2004, 11:01 AM
No he wasn't. He's Vernon Forrest.
I hear people say that and I dont buy that. I think Vernon is a top notch fighter. Mayorga is a bull, and he still might have won the second fight. Vernon could beat alot of top guys

jpboxer3
12-19-2004, 11:11 AM
I hear people say that and I dont buy that. I think Vernon is a top notch fighter. Mayorga is a bull, and he still might have won the second fight. Vernon could beat alot of top guys


Where is Forrest BTW?It's like he pulled a Floyd Patterson and is in hiding after losing twice to Mayorga.Who knows,if Tarver loses in the rematch,we may never see Tarver again(wouldn't be a bad thing:D )

m00ks
12-19-2004, 11:15 AM
Tarver was nothing special.

DLT
12-19-2004, 11:21 AM
Where is Forrest BTW?It's like he pulled a Floyd Patterson and is in hiding after losing twice to Mayorga.Who knows,if Tarver loses in the rematch,we may never see Tarver again(wouldn't be a bad thing:D )
He was supposed to fight a couple of months ago at 154 but he got hurt

The Fix
12-19-2004, 12:51 PM
tarver is a good fighter not great but he is very good and dont count him out yet i think he still has some left in the tank.right now it seems he spent his whole career trying catch roy jones and was satisfied going 1-1 with him

mic573
12-19-2004, 01:00 PM
I don't think I have once heard anybody say Tarver was great.

rudy
12-19-2004, 01:03 PM
I don't think I have once heard anybody say Tarver was great.

Now after the Johnson Great and Tarver can never be spoken about in the same sentenace

Great
12-19-2004, 02:01 PM
I`m disappointed by work of the Tarver. I waited for the greater.

DLT
12-19-2004, 03:12 PM
I don't think I have once heard anybody say Tarver was great.
Alot of idiots put him in the top 5 and some at 2. I know Greg Leon is upset

theironone
12-19-2004, 03:34 PM
Tarver was nothing special.


Mooks i wanted to give you karma for your mighty fine ass but i've got to spread it about first so i'll let you know this way instead :D

Onto the subject :o Tarver is good but i think it's prob more to do with his style for Jones, and age creeping up on jones, and Johnson is on a roll at the minute, even his losing fights he's pushed the opponant all the way sometimes robbed of a win too so he's better than the record suggests, prob only got 4 true losses

trinidadpr87
12-19-2004, 03:47 PM
tarver is a good fighter not great but he is very good and dont count him out yet i think he still has some left in the tank.right now it seems he spent his whole career trying catch roy jones and was satisfied going 1-1 with him
exactly good but not great.

Zab Super Judah
12-19-2004, 05:22 PM
tarver was not ever great....his punch output is weak......and he just covers up ....tarver is one of those fighters that are hard t olook good against and he is a power puncher......but he can be outboxed

phallus
12-19-2004, 06:35 PM
Johnson sure made him look mediocre last night...It's kind of the same with how people said Roy Jones Jr. fought nothing but stiffs his whole career. I mean I don't think they were all A-class fighters, but alot of times, if someone isn't established, you fight them and deliver a dominating performance...they're going to say the person was never good.


yeah, Johnson made him look like what he is, mediocre