from boxintalk.net

SAM_PETER: I'm training in Reno at the 4th street gym. Many great champions have trained here before, I'm just the next one to train here.



The time will show whether he is right. In any case, what do you think?

He can start braggin if he beats Wlad, but that isnt going to happen.

in boxing theirs bragging rights, u gotta win to have that right tho

Seriosuly,

Why are you such a loser?

Why is it necessary to create TWO polls about comments Peter's making to hype the fight?

That would bring your Wlad/Peter thread count to about 6 in the last day.

Why is this fight the most important thing in your life?

Why can't you make a "I can't think or post about anything else" thread and keep all of your mindless non sense in one thread?

What a waste of bandwidth.

Because he wants to discuss the topic with friends. Nothing wrong with that. ;)

The guy clearly has said he thinks it's funny that he wastes this site's bandwidth.

Why can't the Nut Hugging be kept to one thread?

Seriosuly,

Why are you such a loser?

Why is it necessary to create TWO polls about comments Peter's making to hype the fight?

That would bring your Wlad/Peter thread count to about 6 in the last day.

Why is this fight the most important thing in your life?

Why can't you make a "I can't think or post about anything else" thread and keep all of your mindless non sense in one thread?

What a waste of bandwidth.

Dude, get off his case already, it's getting old :lame:

Dude, get off his case already, it's getting old :lame:



No, the constant spamming and attention seeking is getting old.

No, the constant spamming and attention seeking is getting old.

Last time I checked this was a public forum, place where people have discussions. Ever heard of free speech?

Last time I checked this was a public forum, place where people have discussions. Ever heard of free speech?


Ever heard of needlessly wasting bandwidth of a great site?

Take one look at threads created by this clown.

He goes out of his way to create AT LEAST 3 threads about one article or photo.

Ever heard of needlessly wasting bandwidth of a great site?

Take one look at threads created by this clown.

He goes out of his way to create AT LEAST 3 threads about one article or photo.

Sure have. A lot less of bandwidth would be wasted if people would stop following and bashing each other every chance they get. ****, you and me are wasting bandwidth right now.

Sure have. A lot less of bandwidth would be wasted if people would stop following and bashing each other every chance they get. ****, you and me are wasting bandwidth right now.

And that wouldn't be possible if this clown didn't create tripple threads.

What's funny is you talking to me about free speech saying I shouldn't rag on the guy. See the irony in that?

Every time I see him spam, I'll point it out.

Nautilus, I'm gonna go on a limb and assume you're not a fan of Peter? :)

Wlad by TKO inside of 6

What's funny is you talking to me about free speech saying I shouldn't rag on the guy. See the irony in that?


Point taken.
The problem is though, 95% of Nautilus' posts are followed by yours. That's not "ragging", that's hunting.

And that wouldn't be possible if this clown didn't create tripple threads.

What's funny is you talking to me about free speech saying I shouldn't rag on the guy. See the irony in that?

Every time I see him spam, I'll point it out.

So it's ok for you to post mindless nonsense about his posts,
but his actual posts are wasting bandwidth? Why do you contribute to the "problem" by posting on his threads?

Point taken.
The problem is though, 95% of Nautilus' posts are followed by yours. That's not "ragging", that's hunting.


Some would say....."stalking"

Some would say....."stalking"

Even better lol

hes not a 12 round fighter

Point taken.
The problem is though, 95% of Nautilus' posts are followed by yours. That's not "ragging", that's hunting.


Stop exagerating.

95% of POSTS?

I said a while back, if I see him spamming with THREADS, I'll point it out.

I'll continue to do so.

Ever hear of free speech?

hes not a 12 round fighter

simple as that.

I Must Agree with BOZO . Sometimes i believe this place is ran by a secret Society of Klitschko Fanatics who jump at any chance they get to show there love for the Brothers .

Thats the only reason why I even got red Karma , because i made a comment about people being mis-led about the true talents of the brothers . Who knows maybe i will get more for giving my opinion.


I agree though 4 threads about the same topic is a lil bit too much . That is jut my opinion though

( Free Speech )

Stop exagerating.

95% of POSTS?

I said a while back, if I see him spamming with THREADS, I'll point it out.

I'll continue to do so.

Ever hear of free speech?

If I have any free time over the weekend, I will actually calculate the real number. We will talk then.

Seriosuly,

Why are you such a loser?

Why is it necessary to create TWO polls about comments Peter's making to hype the fight?

That would bring your Wlad/Peter thread count to about 6 in the last day.

Why is this fight the most important thing in your life?

Why can't you make a "I can't think or post about anything else" thread and keep all of your mindless non sense in one thread?

What a waste of bandwidth.


You should also point him in the direction ,, about the rules of posting on the forums ...


Reeno says ......" NO COPY CAT THREADS "

If I have any free time over the weekend, I will actually calculate the real number. We will talk then.

Yea, you do that.

Because aside from illustrating what a loser you'd be for taking the time to do something like that, you'd find that me having posted in response to 95% of the guy's posts is a JOKE of an assertion.

As I said, I admit I post in the threads when I think he's SPAMMING, but as for individual posts, that's absurd.

I'll say it again:

This guy reads an article about Wlad / Peter, or finds a photo, and goes out of his way to create several threads about it.

Just LOOK at the link "Threads created by" under his user name.

It's outright SPAMMING.

Bozo, you have been posting at the rate of 12.7 posts a day! And only extremely rarely have you something informative to say.

You are the spammer NUMBER ONE.

Your spamming far supercedes that of anyone else in this site.

Finally, if you do not like my threads/posts, report them to Rick. Just do not waste bandwidth replying.

Seriosuly,

Why are you such a loser?

Why is it necessary to create TWO polls about comments Peter's making to hype the fight?




SAYS WHO?


.

getting back to the topic of this thread... regardles of whether or not peter beats wlad, he doesn't look like the next great champ to me... he looks to sloppy in the ring, his technique needs work....

Im going for Peter but its way to early to tell if hes good. Yes, even after he beats Wlad who hasnt looked good in about four years.

Peter will win. There is no reason to believe otherwise. Peter has incredible power and good speed, especially for such a heavy guy. Klitschko has good speed and decent power, but I doubt he will keep Peter off him. Everybody knows exactly what will happen if Peter lands a clean punch on Klitschko.

sam peter is right

Peter will win. There is no reason to believe otherwise. Peter has incredible power and good speed, especially for such a heavy guy. Klitschko has good speed and decent power, but I doubt he will keep Peter off him. Everybody knows exactly what will happen if Peter lands a clean punch on Klitschko.


Peter won't land a clean punch on Wlad