View Full Version : GI'S hit Rummy with tough Q's.


dodge
12-08-2004, 10:32 PM
U.S. GIs Hit Rumsfeld With Hard Questions

36 minutes ago

By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer

CAMP BUEHRING, Kuwait - In a rare public airing of grievances, disgruntled soldiers complained to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Wednesday about long deployments and a lack of armored vehicles and other equipment.

"You go to war with the Army you have," Rumsfeld replied, "not the Army you might want or wish to have."

Spc. Thomas Wilson had asked the defense secretary, "Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles?" Shouts of approval and applause arose from the estimated 2,300 soldiers who had assembled to see Rumsfeld.

Rumsfeld hesitated and asked Wilson to repeat his question.

"We do not have proper armored vehicles to carry with us north," Wilson, 31, of Nashville, Tenn., concluded after asking again.

Wilson, an airplane mechanic whose unit, the 278th Regimental Combat Team of the Tennessee Army National Guard, is about to drive north into Iraq for a one-year tour of duty, put his finger on a problem that has bedeviled the Pentagon for more than a year. Rarely, though, is it put so bluntly in a public forum.

Rumsfeld said the Army was sparing no expense or effort to acquire as many Humvees and other vehicles with extra armor as it can. What is more, he said, armor is not the savior some think it is.

"You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and a tank can (still) be blown up," he said. The same applies to the much smaller Humvee utility vehicles that, without extra armor, are highly vulnerable to the insurgents' weapon of choice in Iraq, the improvised explosive device that is a roadside threat to Army convoys and patrols.

U.S. soldiers and Marines in Iraq are killed or maimed by roadside bombs almost daily. Adding armor protection to Humvees and other vehicles that normally are not used in direct combat has been a priority for the Army, but manufacturers have not been able to keep up with the demand.

Wilson's ex-wife, Regina, said she was not surprised he challenged Rumsfeld.

"It wouldn't matter if it was Bush himself standing there," she said. "He would have dissed him the same."

Wilson joined the National Guard in June 2003; previously, he had served about four years in the Air Force, beginning in 1994.

Rumsfeld dropped in to Camp Buehring _ named for Lt. Col. Charles Buehring, who was killed in a rocket attack on a downtown Baghdad hotel in November 2003 _ to thank the troops for their service and to give them a pep talk. Later he flew to New Delhi for meetings Thursday with Indian government officials.

In his prepared remarks in Kuwait, Rumsfeld urged the troops _ mostly National Guard and Reserve soldiers _ to discount critics of the war and to help "win the test of wills" with the insurgents.

Wilson and others, however, had criticisms of their own _ not of the war but of how it was being fought.

During the question-and-answer session, another soldier complained that active-duty Army units seem to get priority over National Guard and Reserve units for the best equipment used in Iraq.

"There's no way I can prove it, but I am told the Army is breaking its neck to see that there is not" discrimination of that kind, Rumsfeld said.

Yet another soldier asked how much longer the Army would continue using its "stop loss" power to prevent soldiers from leaving the service who are otherwise eligible to retire or return to civilian life at the end of their enlistment.

Rumsfeld said this condition was simply a fact of life for soldiers in times of war. Critics, including some in Congress, say it's proof the Army has been stretched too thin by war.

"It's basically a sound principle, it's nothing new, it's been well understood" by soldiers, he said. "My guess is it will continue to be used as little as possible, but that it will continue to be used."

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., told Rumsfeld in a letter Wednesday that his response to the question about armored vehicles was "utterly unacceptable" and that it was the duty of the government to provide safety equipment.

"Mr. Secretary, our troops go to war with the Army that our nation's leaders provide," he wrote.

The deputy commanding general of U.S. forces in Kuwait, Maj. Gen. Gary Speer, said in an interview at Camp Buehring that as far as he knew, every vehicle deploying to Iraq from Kuwait had at least "Level 3" armor protection. That means it had locally fabricated armor for its side panels, but not bulletproof windows or reinforced floorboards.

Speer said he was unaware that soldiers were searching landfills for scrap metal and discarded glass.

However, Maj. Gen. Gus L. Hargett, the adjutant general of the Tennessee National Guard, disputed Speer's remarks. "I know that members of his staff were aware and assisted the 278th in obtaining these materials," he said.

At the Pentagon, spokesman Larry Di Rita said production of armored Humvees had increased from 15 to 450 a month since fall 2003, when commanders in Iraq started asking for them because of insurgents' heavy use of roadside explosives.

Overall, there are 19,000 armored Humvees in the Iraqi theater. Some were built with additional armor, others had it added on later. That's, 2,000 short of what commanders are asking for, Di Rita acknowledged.

Military policy is that troops driving into Iraq in Humvees drive only in armored ones, Di Rita said. Some $1.2 billion has been included in the defense budget to pay for armored vehicles, he said.

Explosivo
12-09-2004, 10:45 AM
That guy showed a lot of balls. I hope Rummy gets his head out of his ass and does something about it.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 10:47 AM
Rummy's answers to both questions seemed to boil down to "Tough, deal with it."

What a wonderfully emapthetic man!

DR. FREECLOUD
12-09-2004, 01:49 PM
well he could have said "son we tried to get the funding for it but the dems didn't go for it. so now you have to suffer."

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 02:11 PM
well he could have said "son we tried to get the funding for it but the dems didn't go for it. so now you have to suffer."

Or he could have said, "Halliburton's executive officers each wanted yachts. AND they had to bribe chief justice Scalia. Sorry son."

Bombardier
12-09-2004, 02:17 PM
Or he could have said "We were stupid enough to think we'd have this war won in a couple of weeks. And you were stupid enough to think that joining the Army Reserves would be like, no big deal."

CLubberLang
12-09-2004, 02:21 PM
Rumsfeld sucks just like Bush. We are in a war we don't need to be and this guy has the nerve to just say we have to deal with it as soldiers. Why dont he get his ass out their in a soft shell vehicle and see if he likes it. I love being a soldier and I love serving my country but these guys need to get the fu@# out of office and we need to get our troops home. I will be sent over soon and I will be pretty pissed if I get killed due to lack of equipment.

Bombardier
12-09-2004, 02:25 PM
Rumsfeld sucks just like Bush. We are in a war we don't need to be and this guy has the nerve to just say we have to deal with it as soldiers. Why dont he get his ass out their in a soft shell vehicle and see if he likes it. I love being a soldier and I love serving my country but these guys need to get the fu@# out of office and we need to get our troops home. I will be sent over soon and I will be pretty pissed if I get killed due to lack of equipment.

You're currently serving? Good luck to you if you have to go out there. You guys deserve better than how you're being treated.

In the old days the head of state (a King or Emperor, for example) would be expected to lead the charge into battle. It they did not they would be thought of as weak and probably overthrown. Kinda wish that policy was still in place.

PBDS
12-09-2004, 02:31 PM
Rumsfeld sucks just like Bush. We are in a war we don't need to be and this guy has the nerve to just say we have to deal with it as soldiers. Why dont he get his ass out their in a soft shell vehicle and see if he likes it. I love being a soldier and I love serving my country but these guys need to get the fu@# out of office and we need to get our troops home. I will be sent over soon and I will be pretty pissed if I get killed due to lack of equipment.



.....I suspect by lack of equipment you are refering to a set of balls. I don't believe for one minute that your in the military.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 03:04 PM
.....I suspect by lack of equipment you are refering to a set of balls. I don't believe for one minute that your in the military.

pbds

Are you in the military?

I know many military men who say the same thing.

DR. FREECLOUD
12-09-2004, 03:28 PM
Or he could have said, "Halliburton's executive officers each wanted yachts. AND they had to bribe chief justice Scalia. Sorry son."


right and there is proof yachts? no. there is proof that the money needed was denied. there is proof that the soldiers suffer from it. no need to be sorry. you can't help it if your vision is skewed to the left.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 03:32 PM
right and there is proof yachts? no. there is proof that the money needed was denied. there is proof that the soldiers suffer from it. no need to be sorry. you can't help it if your vision is skewed to the left.

The money in that bill was going to be allocated to HALLIBURTON. Not the troops. THAT is why many politicians Dems and Republicans voted against it.

Besides, I was kidding. Calm down.

Soundtraveler
12-09-2004, 03:38 PM
The lack of proper equipment, and the lack of manpower is due to former President Clintons' bright idea to downsize the military. He closed more bases, stopped more military vehicle production, stopped more aircrafts from being built than any President in history. Now his actions are getting troops killed daily, way to go Clinton.

When the Dem. party was busy trying to make Bush seem like a coward for going into the Reserves during Nam, I had to laugh, because Clinton went to Canada to avoid the draft, and he was elected twice. Funny -- the Dem. party didn't have a problem with trying to get a bonified "draft dodger" elected, but they did have a problem with someone joining the "reserves" instead...

DR. FREECLOUD
12-09-2004, 03:43 PM
The money in that bill was going to be allocated to HALLIBURTON. Not the troops. THAT is why many politicians Dems and Republicans voted against it.

Besides, I was kidding. Calm down.

yo my vessels ain't stretchin! calm as can be. you and i are cool. i don't have problems with people because of political views. what is it exactly halliburton is doing? although i don't agree on hte way they won the contract it doesn't change the fact that they are there and refusing them money at this point is the same as refusing our troops supplies.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 03:57 PM
yo my vessels ain't stretchin! calm as can be. you and i are cool. i don't have problems with people because of political views. what is it exactly halliburton is doing? although i don't agree on hte way they won the contract it doesn't change the fact that they are there and refusing them money at this point is the same as refusing our troops supplies.

Well, when our government gives money to a multinational corporation, I believe that what that money should be used for SHOULD be specified. Sorry but people DO get greedy.

As it is, there is a few million dollars that Halliburton recieved but cannot account for.

DR. FREECLOUD
12-09-2004, 04:00 PM
The lack of proper equipment, and the lack of manpower is due to former President Clintons' bright idea to downsize the military. He closed more bases, stopped more military vehicle production, stopped more aircrafts from being built than any President in history. Now his actions are getting troops killed daily, way to go Clinton.

When the Dem. party was busy trying to make Bush seem like a coward for going into the Reserves during Nam, I had to laugh, because Clinton went to Canada to avoid the draft, and he was elected twice. Funny -- the Dem. party didn't have a problem with trying to get a bonified "draft dodger" elected, but they did have a problem with someone joining the "reserves" instead...

i'd return you the karma but i did recently and we all know what that means. but you are correct sir!

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:09 PM
The lack of proper equipment, and the lack of manpower is due to former President Clintons' bright idea to downsize the military. He closed more bases, stopped more military vehicle production, stopped more aircrafts from being built than any President in history. Now his actions are getting troops killed daily, way to go Clinton.

When the Dem. party was busy trying to make Bush seem like a coward for going into the Reserves during Nam, I had to laugh, because Clinton went to Canada to avoid the draft, and he was elected twice. Funny -- the Dem. party didn't have a problem with trying to get a bonified "draft dodger" elected, but they did have a problem with someone joining the "reserves" instead...

What made Bush a coward was that he joined the reserves but essentially deserted. To me, this is worse than draft dodging.

NOBODY in the democratic party talked about GW's service record in the 2000 election. It only became a story in 2004.

"President Clintons' bright idea to downsize the military. He closed more bases, stopped more military vehicle production, stopped more aircrafts from being built than any President in history. Now his actions are getting troops killed daily, way to go Clinton."

Now, how did Clinton do all this? I know alot of Republicans say this but few can site specific examples except for "Well I heard it on Rush Limbaugh."

Also, if I recall correctly the Senate was controlled by Republicans when Clinton was Pres. It is not in the President's power to just arbitrarily close military bases and downsize the military.

If you give me some instances of this I will be happy to back track.

Soundtraveler
12-09-2004, 04:18 PM
I will get back to you on the subject, right now I have to drive to Montgomery Alabama -- see y'all when I get back !

Explosivo
12-09-2004, 04:18 PM
What made Bush a coward was that he joined the reserves but essentially deserted. To me, this is worse than draft dodging.

NOBODY in the democratic party talked about GW's service record in the 2000 election. It only became a story in 2004.

"President Clintons' bright idea to downsize the military. He closed more bases, stopped more military vehicle production, stopped more aircrafts from being built than any President in history. Now his actions are getting troops killed daily, way to go Clinton."

Now, how did Clinton do all this? I know alot of Republicans say this but few can site specific examples except for "Well I heard it on Rush Limbaugh."

Also, if I recall correctly the Senate was controlled by Republicans when Clinton was Pres. It is not in the President's power to just arbitrarily close military bases and downsize the military.

If you give me some instances of this I will be happy to back track.

Com'on now. How is what Bush did, which was what THEY let him get away with, worse that actually dodging the draft? I sense a little prejudice toward Bush...
Bush didnt do anything he wasnt allowed to do. Not that it was right, but they let him get away with it.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:29 PM
Com'on now. How is what Bush did, which was what THEY let him get away with, worse that actually dodging the draft? I sense a little prejudice toward Bush...
Bush didnt do anything he wasnt allowed to do. Not that it was right, but they let him get away with it.

Some soldiers I know feel the same way. When you join the military especially when you volunteer, you make a commitment. You make a pact with the government. By deserting you are failing to live up to your end.

Drafting FORCES people to make that commitment when it should be voluntary. How can we claim to have a volunteer army when people are forced into it. I have no moral or ethical problem with draft dodgers.

PBDS
12-09-2004, 04:34 PM
pbds

Are you in the military?

I know many military men who say the same thing.



....Yeah, I'm originaly from the Virginia Beach/Norfolk area and I go back there all the time and have alot of friends in the military and working as civilians for the military and that is not a prevailing attitude at all. Unless you got names, ranks, and serial numbers of the traitors in question then I seriously doubt your claim.

PBDS
12-09-2004, 04:39 PM
Some soldiers I know feel the same way. When you join the military especially when you volunteer, you make a commitment. You make a pact with the government. By deserting you are failing to live up to your end.

Drafting FORCES people to make that commitment when it should be voluntary. How can we claim to have a volunteer army when people are forced into it. I have no moral or ethical problem with draft dodgers.



....Man, thats ****ed up about your custom title. Especially since everything is sold out and you can't change it back. Your gonna have to live with that one for a while.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:42 PM
....Yeah, I'm originaly from the Virginia Beach/Norfolk area and I go back there all the time and have alot of friends in the military and working as civilians for the military and that is not a prevailing attitude at all. Unless you got names, ranks, and serial numbers of the traitors in question then I seriously doubt your claim.

My cousin who was stationed in Fallujah for one.

I don't see how one is a traitor for having an opinion.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:43 PM
....Man, thats ****ed up about your custom title. Especially since everything is sold out and you can't change it back. Your gonna have to live with that one for a while.

Ah I don't sweat it. I have been called far worse. This is an internet bulletin board after all.

PBDS
12-09-2004, 04:46 PM
Ah I don't sweat it. I have been called far worse. This is an internet bulletin board after all.


.....Looks like you and Nautilus got a little custom title thing going.:)

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:49 PM
.....Looks like you and Nautilus got a little custom title thing going.:)

Hehe, oh and I thought it might have been you.

Coming from nautilus. I am suprised he couldn't have done something more clever.

I thought his title of 'V. Klitchsko's nut barnacle' was especially harsh. I just felt like tearing into him a bit.

PBDS
12-09-2004, 04:55 PM
Hehe, oh and I thought it might have been you.

Coming from nautilus. I am suprised he couldn't have done something more clever.

I thought his title of 'V. Klitchsko's nut barnacle' was especially harsh. I just felt like tearing into him a bit.


......Yeah, whenever I see a custom title changed I like to go in and see who did it. The "change your own custom" title section has been closed out for a while. The change other users custom title just got sold out today.

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:57 PM
Well, I think I can handle being called a '*** head'

LuKahnLi
12-09-2004, 04:57 PM
If he called me "GW Bush's bastard Son" that would have been tough to bear.

CLubberLang
12-11-2004, 12:37 AM
.....I suspect by lack of equipment you are refering to a set of balls. I don't believe for one minute that your in the military.


Well for your information I am in the ARMY and have been for over 8 years now. I am just not one of these people, maybe like yourself ;) , who has to be politically correct all the time. I don't have to be a soldier to know that our military personell not having the right equipment is messed up. Since you question things you know nothing of, any time you want to set up a Q36 or Q37(13R20 skill required) Radar system then let me know. If that is to hard for you then then we can prepare Combat Medic(91W20, formerly 91B20) skills and see who's better. If you know so much then let me know your AKO account name and we can chat over secure lines to quench your doubt.