View Full Version : boxrec all time-rankings


wmute
05-25-2005, 07:45 PM
do they make sense or not?

as214
05-25-2005, 07:47 PM
[QUOTE=wmute]do they make sense or not?t

they list Tito as the number one welterweight of all time what do you think!! Hes not even in the Top ten welterweights of all time

Torino
05-25-2005, 07:48 PM
I checked that out the other day. I'm not sure yet if it makes sense. For one example, they had Trinidad over SRL. I don't feel good about that.

as214
05-25-2005, 07:50 PM
I checked that out the other day. I'm not sure yet if it makes sense. For one example, they had Trinidad over SRL. I don't feel good about that.


Tito isnt even the best welterweight from his era, how the hell is he gonna be the best of all time?

{BrownBomber}
05-25-2005, 07:51 PM
what point system do they use?

Torino
05-25-2005, 07:52 PM
Tito isnt even the best welterweight from his era, how the hell is he gonna be the best of all time?

I don't agree with it either

IwatchBoxing
05-25-2005, 07:53 PM
what point system do they use?
I dont know, but Trinidad had 17 title defenses against only the best at Welterweight, the rankings are good, here they are http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?p=665990#post665990, I'm laughing at these haters, their hair is gonna turn grey by tommorow :D

as214
05-25-2005, 07:54 PM
what point system do they use?


They use an extensive , nuthugging logarithmic formula based on saliva input to Tito's nuts.. Everytime IWatchBoxing sucks on one of Titos cowardly balls , an electic probe in his butt records and downloads points next to Titos name on Box Rec.. Subsequent calculations and tallies grant all time status based on number of points accrued.. Thus Tito clearly is the greatest welterweight of all time

BadMagick
05-25-2005, 07:54 PM
Joe Louis doesn't break their top 10 heavyweights. It's useless. Joe Louis is one of the best heavyweights ever.

Roy Jones is on NONE of their lists, but two people he dominated are: Vinny Pazienza, and Virgil Hill. Not to mention Pazienza was a Super-middle weight, not a light heavyweight.

Boxrec.com sucks for everything except finding records.

To further prove my point, Marvin Hagler is their #1 Middleweight. No doubt he was good, but... come on... OVER SUGAR RAY ROBINSON!? I don't think so.

{BrownBomber}
05-25-2005, 08:01 PM
Joe Louis doesn't break their top 10 heavyweights. It's useless. Joe Louis is one of the best heavyweights ever.

Roy Jones is on NONE of their lists, but two people he dominated are: Vinny Pazienza, and Virgil Hill. Not to mention Pazienza was a Super-middle weight, not a light heavyweight.

Boxrec.com sucks for everything except finding records.

To further prove my point, Marvin Hagler is their #1 Middleweight. No doubt he was good, but... come on... OVER SUGAR RAY ROBINSON!? I don't think so.
:confused: Chavez isnt there either

IwatchBoxing
05-25-2005, 08:06 PM
:confused: Chavez isnt there either
Chavez is number 8 at Welterweight, and even on biased rankings, those number one fighters all deserve to be top ten at the weight they put most work in.

Memorex
05-25-2005, 08:23 PM
tito #1 middle weight of all time? no ****ing way. if u think that then u dont know boxing plain and simple.