a) It is believed by most that the Klitschko brothers are both very intelligent and smart.
b) It is their dream of being world champs at the same time

Now, What do you think of my allegations below?

1st Action - Vitaly keeps rescheduling his bout with Rahman. In result Rahman is fighting Barrett for Vitaly's Interim title. This clears room for Wlad, who is ranked as the #3 contender for the IBF (Cris Byrd's belt) behind #1 Barrett and #2 Rahman.

2nd Action - Wlad sues IBF to become mandatory as the IBF rules are:
<<IBF rule requiring the heavyweight champion to “defend his championship within intervals of no more than nine months against the leading available contender.” According to the complaint, Byrd last made a mandatory defense on November 13, 2004 with a split decision victory over Jameel McCline and therefore must fulfill his mandatory obligation prior to August 13, 2005.>>

Source: **********.com
http://www.**********.net/pages/free3769.htm

I think Wlad wouldn't need to sue anyone to get a higher ranking had he not been stopped by two fringe contenders in his last 6 fights.

haha. That is pretty good thinking man. I never really looked at it like that.

I think Wlad wouldn't need to sue anyone to get a higher ranking had he not been stopped by two fringe contenders in his last 6 fights.
But you cannot change the past, so what does your ****ty statement have to do with the thread?

haha. That is pretty good thinking man. I never really looked at it like that.
Your comments are much appreciated :-)

so what does your ****ty statement

****ty statement? It's a factual statement. The only thing "****ty" about it is the way it makes you feel when you remeber the reality behind it.


My statement is what it is.

Wlad would A) have a belt (WBO) and B) no doubt wouldn't need to sue anyone to get a higher ranking elsewhere if he hadn't been stopped by two fringe contenders in his last 6 fights.


What does that have to do with your thread?

You wouldn't even be raising these questions and assertions if he hadn't lost those fights.

If your feelings are so easilly hurt that a simple factual statement causes your feathers to get ruffled, don't post anything.

if wlad is 3 by ibf and rahman and barret are 1-2 but r gonan fight for wbc that means wlad is auto number 1, i think wlad is sueing byrd into fighting him al la lewis rahman 2

****ty statement? It's a factual statement. The only thing "****ty" about it is the way it makes you feel when you remeber the reality behind it.


My statement is what it is.

Wlad would A) have a belt (WBO) and B) no doubt wouldn't need to sue anyone to get a higher ranking elsewhere if he hadn't been stopped by two fringe contenders in his last 6 fights.


What does that have to do with your thread?

You wouldn't even be raising these questions and assertions if he hadn't lost those fights.

If your feelings are so easilly hurt that a simple factual statement causes your feathers to get ruffled, don't post anything.
Bozo, you always live in your la-la land..

Stop giving the "What Ifs"

If he hasn't lost...

If he that.. If he this...



This is reality I'm talking about. Yes he lost and it doesn't change anything I have posted in the original thread.

Lewis wouldn't need to fight Rahman again IF he didn't loose in the first place.