View Full Version : Camacho vs. Haugen I - Was Camacho robbed?


chavezjr
05-12-2005, 05:30 PM
Not counting that Haugen failed the post-fight drug test that made this fight a no contest...
I had Camacho winning the fight even with the point deducted for not punching Haugen, but what do you think?

SCtrojansbaby
10-19-2011, 03:19 AM
Obvious robbery, glad it was changed to a no contest because of the drugs or whatever

Boxing Bob
10-19-2011, 11:16 AM
ScTrojan, this was an obvious robbery but Chavez/Whitaker wasn't? I think Camacho deserved the nod even with the point deduction

SCtrojansbaby
10-19-2011, 11:31 AM
Camacho didn't hit anyone with almost a dozen low blows

Obama
10-19-2011, 11:39 PM
Giving Haugen every benefit of the doubt plus the point deduction he doesn't even win 5 rounds. And the reason for the deduction wasn't even Camacho's fault. He went to touch gloves and Haugen pulled his back. Then Haugen celebrated the deduction, like enthusiastically. :rofl: ***** move at it's finest.

Scott9945
10-19-2011, 11:58 PM
Camacho didn't hit anyone with almost a dozen low blows


Low blows don't factor in the scoring if the referee doesn't penalize the boxers. Was Whitaker even warned?

SCtrojansbaby
10-20-2011, 05:32 AM
Low blows don't factor in the scoring if the referee doesn't penalize the boxers. Was Whitaker even warned?

Whitaker was warned about 5x Cortez never took a point away. That fight shouldn't have even made it to the 12th Whitaker should of been DQ'd in the 6th round