This could be interesting

Who would win?

Marciano beats Dempsey, Frazier in a good fight with Marciano with the slight edge going to Frazier, and Tyson beats Marciano and Dempsey more times than not. Against Frazier, Tyson might win 2 or 3 out of 10, but would mainly lose by decision or late TKo's/KO's.

Marciano v Dempsey Marciano ko
Frazier v Tyson Tyson ko

Tyson vs Frazier. I don't know who wins
Marciano wins in Mid rounds against Dempsey

Marciano KO 3-4 Dempsey
Tyson KO 2-3 Frazier

marciano wins by ko in 5
and either tyson wins early by ko or loses to score card

Marciano could beat all three, but he could only beat Frazier by either TKO or SD. Dempsey could beat Frazier by SD. Tyson could beat only Dempsey by late KO. Frazier beats Tyson by late KO or TKO. Tyson could beat only Dempsey by late KO and that's a stretch.

dempsey over marciano by late ko.
frazier over tyson by late ko.
tyson over dempsey by 1 round ko.
tyson over marciano by 50 sec. ko lol!
frazier over marciano by mid ko.
frazier over dempsey by 6 round ko.

and da winner is............smokin' joe frazier!
2nd- tyson
3rd- dempsey
4th- marciano

tyson vs dempsey vs frazier would be a good fight because they all had the same style bob and weave

WOW, the 4 most agressive heavyweights of all-time. This could be good, really good. All were short, came straight at opponents, had power in both hands, though all had exceptionally powerful left hooks (especially Frazier and Dempsey). Overall power of them goes to Marciano, handspeed to either Tyson or Dempsey, stamina to Frazier, chin to Frazier, heart to either Marciano or Frazier.

Frazier fought in arguably a tougher time with Ali, Foreman, Norton, Lyle, Chuvalo, etc. Frazier was the most underrated of the 4, for his power is said to be worse than all. Actually, Frazier's power can hold it's own with all 3 other men. He tore Chuvalo's eye out of it's socket. Frazier came at his opponent and didn't let up better than any of the other 3. He hard arguably the best left hook of the group, though relied on it a little too much. Frazier was a slow starter, as well.

Marciano is the most overrated, however, a great boxer. Marciano is argubaly the hardest hittir of the group. I know, people will be at my house tonite to burn it down for not saying Tyson hits the hardest, but Marciano was a much more brutal puncher. Look at what he did to Walcott. Good god. Marciano's heart is great, as is his chin. He tends to cut easily, and is good at keeping pressure on his opponent.

Tyson is the most intimidating of the group. He won a lot of his fights by scaring the shit out of his opponents, which he was damn good at. But let's not let that take away from his great skills. Tyson was the better defensive boxer of the group. His bobbing and weaving made him hard to hit. He had about the same handspeed as Dempsey, though Dempsey mainly through hooks, while Tyson throw a lot of uppercuts. Tyson tended to burn out over time, which could prove to be his downfall.

Dempsey had the most dynamite of the group. He was the most unexpected, and when he stormed onto the scene by knocking Willard down 7 times in one round, people knew they were dealing with someone exceptionally gifted. Dempsey was also a great defensive fighter, and was hard to hit. His handspeed was argubaly the best of the group, and one didn't know where he was gonna hit next. He was constantly switching from body shots to head shots, back and forth. Dempsey's chin would be his downfall.


I have no clue how this would turn out. Either 4 could turn out on top. Either Joe's slow start or too much reliance on the left hook could be his downfall. Rocky's lack of speed compared to the others and his tendency to cut easily could be his downfall. Tyson's lack of stamina and heart could be his downfall. And Dempsey's lack of chin could be his downfall. I would have loved to see a small tournament of these 4.

marciano had way better stamina then joe the guy never clinched in his life
he couldve gone 20 rounds

42 rounds with Muhammad Ali is all the stamina you need.