View Full Version : What would you rather have in Pac/EM?


oldgringo
03-16-2005, 12:28 PM
Would you rather see 4-5 rounds of an all out, savage brawl where one guy finally unleashes a devastating KO punch?

OR

Would you like to see a 12 round, tactical battle with good action in spurts, and a TKO in the final round to add some drama?


I'd personally go for the latter but whatever floats your boat...

JOM'S
03-16-2005, 12:30 PM
I Want To See The Best Three Rounds In Boxing History Ala Hagler-hearns

Or

A Classic 12 Round Bout Of Blood And Gore, Similar To A Gatti-ward

Sir_Jose
03-16-2005, 12:30 PM
Dont matter as long as Morales comes out on top.

JOM'S
03-16-2005, 12:31 PM
Dont matter as long as Morales comes out on top.

HE HE HE, WHERE'S THE FUN IN THAT ...

m00ks
03-16-2005, 12:35 PM
12 round of action packed battle always better than a short stoppage.

lapulapu
03-16-2005, 12:41 PM
I Want To See The Best Three Rounds In Boxing History Ala Hagler-hearns

Or

A Classic 12 Round Bout Of Blood And Gore, Similar To A Gatti-ward


Less than 12 is the best. The whole 12 rounds is too risky for Pacman. The best he can get is a draw. Less than 12 removes the judges from the picture.

oldgringo
03-16-2005, 12:41 PM
12 round of action packed battle always better than a short stoppage.


But i'm not talking about 12 rounds of action packed battle. I'm talkin about 12 rounds of a more relaxed, measured pace with good action in short spurts...every couple rounds or so. Ultimately, a TKO comes in the final round to give it drama.

as opposed to

Hagler/Hearns for 4-5 rounds.

m00ks
03-16-2005, 12:45 PM
But i'm not talking about 12 rounds of action packed battle. I'm talkin about 12 rounds of a more relaxed, measured pace with good action in short spurts...every couple rounds or so. Ultimately, a TKO comes in the final round to give it drama.

as opposed to

Hagler/Hearns for 4-5 rounds.

You mean ala Tito-Hokins?

lapulapu
03-16-2005, 12:47 PM
But i'm not talking about 12 rounds of action packed battle. I'm talkin about 12 rounds of a more relaxed, measured pace with good action in short spurts...every couple rounds or so. Ultimately, a TKO comes in the final round to give it drama.

as opposed to

Hagler/Hearns for 4-5 rounds.


If the fight reaches the 12th round, I don't think anybody will give up. Even if you give Manny and Erik a gun in the 12th, none of them will die in that round. Maybe after the fight.

oldgringo
03-16-2005, 12:48 PM
You mean ala Tito-Hokins?


Yeah but without the one sided beating.

mic573
03-16-2005, 12:51 PM
I just want it to be a great fight worthy of the hype which I think it will be.

m00ks
03-16-2005, 12:51 PM
Yeah but without the one sided beating.

It'd be ok. I would like to see a Morals-Barerra 1 with a late TKO.

lapulapu
03-16-2005, 01:01 PM
It'd be ok. I would like to see a Morals-Barerra 1 with a late TKO.


Morales and Barerra are too even. No way you can see a TKO between the 2, even if they go for 5 fights.

Sir_Jose
03-16-2005, 01:43 PM
HE HE HE, WHERE'S THE FUN IN THAT ...


Oh trust me there will be plenty of fun in that

m00ks
03-16-2005, 01:44 PM
Morales and Barerra are too even. No way you can see a TKO between the 2, even if they go for 5 fights.

Morales can knock him out if he weren't so stubborn.

manila_assasin
03-16-2005, 01:46 PM
I would rather have a KO than a 12 round. I don't really trust the judges giving it to MP when it gets down to that.

lapulapu
03-16-2005, 01:57 PM
I would rather have a KO than a 12 round. I don't really trust the judges giving it to MP when it gets down to that.


You're on the ball. Just like my feeling.

lapulapu
03-16-2005, 01:58 PM
Morales can knock him out if he weren't so stubborn.


That's what Barerra was telling himself too.