boxingbuff
08-07-2009, 04:01 PM
I believe this would be a close,hard,and very close fight.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
|
View Full Version : Marvin Hagler vs Jake Lamota boxingbuff 08-07-2009, 04:01 PM I believe this would be a close,hard,and very close fight. Any thoughts? them_apples 08-07-2009, 04:09 PM Hagler would overpower him and win a solid UD. Lamotta is only Durans size with only half the skill and a better chin (yes that sounds weird). joseph5620 08-07-2009, 04:11 PM I believe this would be a close,hard,and very close fight. Any thoughts? UD for Hagler based on his superior boxing skills. Lamotta was so strong and had an iron chin so I don't see a KO for Hagler. Southpaw16BF 08-07-2009, 04:20 PM I feel if Hagler were to go to war with Lamotta, I feel Lamotta would have a good chance and it would be a stupid move if Hagler were to do so. Hagler could box beautifully behind his right jab, then switch to orthodox slipping, parrying and countering. Do he could brawl with the best of them. He was also a heavy puncher 52 ko's in 67 fights, but it's highly unlikely that he would dent Lamotta's chin. Lamotta is widely considered to have the best chin boxing, but people always seem to just think he was a complete face first fighter.He was strong, aggressive but clever at slipping and rolling away from punchers. I think it's virtually fact there wound't be a KO in this fight. And I feel if Hagler stuck to his boxing and used his brain he can beat Lamotta on a UD. Do I dout it would be all one way as Lamotta has plenty of moments in the fight. You could say it would be similar to Hagler's fight with Bennie Briscoe, do Lamotta is more skilled and a better pressure fighter than Briscoe was. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zh0nVsVCi-M&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zh0nVsVCi-M&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Obama 08-07-2009, 04:21 PM Hagler would overpower him and win a solid UD. Lamotta is only Durans size with only half the skill and a better chin (yes that sounds weird). Yet he'd still come in the ring 170 in his prime. #1Assassin 08-07-2009, 04:27 PM hagler wins by a clear decision. lamotta was a tough guy and one hell of a fighter but hagler is just a allround superior fighter. BEEHOP 08-07-2009, 09:58 PM Too much Fight night for you. Hagler batters him with a UD or TKO similar to Robinson's Southpaw Stinger 08-07-2009, 10:03 PM Hagler would overpower him and win a solid UD. Lamotta is only Durans size with only half the skill and a better chin (yes that sounds weird). Lamotta was a big Middle and had trouble making 160lbs. But I'd agree Hagler wins a UD. TheGreatA 08-07-2009, 10:07 PM LaMotta was stronger I think, the only one who could match him with strength at middleweight was Dick Tiger. Hagler's overall game would likely be too much for LaMotta to overcome however, later on in his career Hagler became very adept at picking apart come forward pressure fighters although Roldan with his awkwardness gave him a lot of trouble. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lJb_oLfVaU0&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lJb_oLfVaU0&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> LaMotta would present many of the same problems stylistically except he had a better chin than the somewhat chinny Roldan. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Onb-p3YsQk8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Onb-p3YsQk8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object> them_apples 08-07-2009, 11:26 PM Yet he'd still come in the ring 170 in his prime. he cut 15 lbs in one night? BS, thats hard enough to do even on second day weight in. Duran came in pretty heavy himself. TheGreatA 08-07-2009, 11:41 PM he cut 15 lbs in one night? BS, thats hard enough to do even on second day weight in. Duran came in pretty heavy himself. He didn't but LaMotta was known to cut a lot of weight and put on a lot of pounds after the weigh-in. He often insisted on having the weigh-in early. Duran wasn't in his best shape at 160 lbs. He started as a bantam when he was a teenager, was at his best as a lightweight and still very good at welter. LaMotta started as a light heavyweight, went down to 160 when he realized he couldn't make it at the higher weights due to his lack of height and reach, had trouble making the limit later on in his career and started fighting as a light heavy again. Obama 08-08-2009, 01:52 AM he cut 15 lbs in one night? BS, thats hard enough to do even on second day weight in. Duran came in pretty heavy himself. he didn't weigh in at 155 his whole prime. id say he'd go up 10 lbs. And the cutting can begin longer than that.... them_apples 08-08-2009, 02:04 AM he didn't weigh in at 155 his whole prime. id say he'd go up 10 lbs. And the cutting can begin longer than that.... he probably came in at 160-162. Duran probably came in at 160. considering they have the same reach, almost the same height - and the fact that Lamotta looked small compared former WW SRR, I'd say he wasn't that big. Not saying size really matters, but Hagler would overpower him, even in a brawl - the guy couldn't even punch that hard for a MW. Obama 08-08-2009, 02:07 AM he probably came in at 160-162. Duran probably came in at 160. considering they have the same reach, almost the same height - and the fact that Lamotta looked small compared former WW SRR, I'd say he wasn't that big. Not saying size really matters, but Hagler would overpower him, even in a brawl - the guy couldn't even punch that hard for a MW. Yea, Sam Langford wasn't big either. But he was compact. Duran @ 160 is not compact. TheGreatA 08-08-2009, 02:25 AM he probably came in at 160-162. Duran probably came in at 160. considering they have the same reach, almost the same height - and the fact that Lamotta looked small compared former WW SRR, I'd say he wasn't that big. Not saying size really matters, but Hagler would overpower him, even in a brawl - the guy couldn't even punch that hard for a MW. LaMotta only weighed 155 to one catchweight fight against Tony Janiro. LaMotta had trouble getting fights at the time and Janiro's camp only accepted to take the fight if LaMotta agreed to go down in weight, thinking it would make him weaker. Robinson was a tall welter but LaMotta still threw Robinson around and roughed him up. Leonard to me didn't look any smaller than Hagler and Hearns looked huge next to Hagler. Duran stood eye to eye with him. Hagler may have more power but it would be best for him to keep away from LaMotta and try to counter punch him. I wouldn't pick too many men to beat LaMotta in a slugfest. Hagler drawn into a brawl with Antuofermo in their first fight: <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/31y_iyrGYyw&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/31y_iyrGYyw&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> A more experienced Hagler stays away from Antuofermo and picks him apart in their rematch: <object width="384" height="313"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qr1rVAVGrg8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qr1rVAVGrg8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="313" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object> Keep in mind that the footage we have of LaMotta is him past his peak. Robinson said that the sixth fight was easier for him because LaMotta seemed much slower than in their previous bouts in the 1940's. “I couldn’t match strength with LaMotta,” Robinson said afterward. “But he was slower than he had been six years earlier. That made him an easier target. My jab had puffed up his face and I had hit him with quite a few body shots. His punches had lost their zing.” <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jkf2ugQg8hU&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jkf2ugQg8hU&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> <div><object width="480" height="381"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x6vhwn_jake-lamotta_sport&related=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x6vhwn_jake-lamotta_sport&related=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="381" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></object><br /><b><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6vhwn_jake-lamotta_sport">Jake LaMotta</a></b><br /><i>Uploaded by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/TheGreatA">TheGreatA</a>. - <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/channel/sport">Check out more sports and extreme sports videos.</a></i></div> Obama 08-08-2009, 01:04 PM I think the 6th fight being easier had more to do with Ray finally being a full fledged Middleweight. TheGreatA 08-08-2009, 01:14 PM I think the 6th fight being easier had more to do with Ray finally being a full fledged Middleweight. Well, not according to himself. Robinson may have been stronger but still nowhere near as strong as LaMotta, and he wasn't quite as quick as he was in his welterweight prime. He did take his share of punishment in the 6th fight and it was pretty much even until the late rounds when LaMotta ran out of gas. Robinson weighed around 155 in their 6th fight, 150 in the fifth fight. Robinson walked away with a controversial decision that time. Obama 08-08-2009, 01:20 PM Well, not according to himself. Robinson may have been stronger but still nowhere near as strong as LaMotta, and he wasn't quite as quick as he was in his welterweight prime. He did take his share of punishment in the 6th fight and it was pretty much even until the late rounds when LaMotta ran out of gas. Robinson weighed around 155 in their 6th fight, 150 in the fifth fight. Robinson walked away with a controversial decision that time. If it was even till the late rounds then LaMotta gassed, you have to ask yourself why he gassed. Fighting a bigger, stronger man than you usually do makes the gas tank run out quicker. TheGreatA 08-08-2009, 01:27 PM If it was even till the late rounds then LaMotta gassed, you have to ask yourself why he gassed. Fighting a bigger, stronger man than you usually do makes the gas tank run out quicker. LaMotta in his prime was known for great stamina. He simply had trouble making weight at that point of his career. Even Robinson himself admitted that it was his strategy to take the fight into the later rounds because he knew LaMotta was weight-drained. <object width="384" height="313"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jkf2ugQg8hU&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jkf2ugQg8hU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="313" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object> Obama 08-08-2009, 01:46 PM LaMotta in his prime was known for great stamina. He simply had trouble making weight at that point of his career. Even Robinson himself admitted that it was his strategy to take the fight into the later rounds because he knew LaMotta was weight-drained. Robinson is taking guesses just like we are. LaMotta also fought a lot of smaller men in his prime. His notable wins come against small guys and past it guys. TheGreatA 08-08-2009, 02:02 PM Robinson is taking guesses just like we are. LaMotta also fought a lot of smaller men in his prime. His notable wins come against small guys and past it guys. I think he fought a great variety of opposition. Wins over Ray Robinson, Marcel Cerdan, Fritzie Zivic, Holman Williams, Jose Basora, Laurent Dauthuille, Bob Murphy, Bob Satterfield, Tony Janiro, Bert Lytell, Tiberio Mitri, Gene Hairston, Robert Villemain, Joey DeJohn, George Costner, Tommy Bell, Jackie Wilson, Tommy Yarosz, Walter Woods, George Kochan, Jimmy Edgar, etc. I'm not sure what you mean by Robinson taking guesses. He executed a successful gameplan of conserving his energy in the early rounds to take out a drained LaMotta in the late rounds. mickey malone 08-08-2009, 04:29 PM Can't see any size advantages other than Haglers enormous reach, which in effect would give Hagler a UD.. Chin & stamina wise, there's little to choose.. |