View Full Version : How can you be on DANA WHITE s side?


P4Pacquiao
08-04-2009, 07:38 PM
How can you belive that freakin idiot.

That guy talks crap about everybody.

That guy said RASHAD EVANS su.cks at TUF.
He thought he will get eliminated in first round!
And he also said that RASHAD was in most boring fight ever!

That crap that ANDERSON SILVA is best P4P fighter is just crazy.
That guy got submitted twice against a B level fighter in 2003 and 2004.

FEDOR is best P4P fighter hands down!

Few days ago he said that they show nothing but respect to FEDOR.
Are you fuc.kin kidding me?
What about FEDOR is overrated,if FEDOR is best P4P fighter
then 70 years old MUHAMMAD ALI is P4P best boxer in the world.
And he also said that FEDOR is not best heavyweight in the world!

Fedor said that few years ago UFC gave him terrible deal that he thought that someone wants to fuc.k him!

DANA WHITE is complete retard and their gay games on DANA WHITE blogs are so retarded.

kswizzy99
08-04-2009, 08:14 PM
Dana White is a very emotional and competitive person and that makes him say some pretty regrettable things at times, but he is trying his best to change that. He made up with Tito Ortiz by flying to his house just to make a deal, and he DID show a lot of respect to Fedor during the last negotiations. It was only after his generous offer was rejected that he said some nasty things towards Fedor. Sure he shouldn't be saying those things from a business side of things, but that is just the way he is.

And IMO GSP is the P4P best in the world because he has the best resume in MMA history. When it comes to pure overall skill, I would have to give it to Silva and Silva also has a slightly better resume than Fedor. But Fedor's explosiveness on the ground and in his strikes is second to none. Also his transitioning skills from standup to ground are the best I have ever seen.

And I didn't know about the Rashad Evans comments. Do you have a video or article where Dana was quoted saying those things about Rashad?

P4Pacquiao
08-04-2009, 08:24 PM
Dana White is a very emotional and competitive person and that makes him say some pretty regrettable things at times, but he is trying his best to change that. He made up with Tito Ortiz by flying to his house just to make a deal, and he DID show a lot of respect to Fedor during the last negotiations. It was only after his generous offer was rejected that he said some nasty things towards Fedor. Sure he shouldn't be saying those things from a business side of things, but that is just the way he is.

And IMO GSP is the P4P best in the world because he has the best resume in MMA history. When it comes to pure overall skill, I would have to give it to Silva and Silva also has a slightly better resume than Fedor. But Fedor's explosiveness on the ground and in his strikes is second to none. Also his transitioning skills from standup to ground are the best I have ever seen.

And I didn't know about the Rashad Evans comments. Do you have a video or article where Dana was quoted saying those things about Rashad?



Maybe GSP is P4P best or like my Z-TRAIN homie JOE90210 said
that FEDOR and GSP are both number 1 p4p fighters!

Dude you cant say that SILVA has better resume then FEDOR.
SILVA is on top of his game now but he got submitted by TAKASE and the sickest leg lock probably in history by CHONAN and they both are B-LEVEL fighters.
FEDOR s resume is like from movie(CROCOP,NOGUEIRA ,COLEMAN ,RANDLEMAN,FUJITA,HERRING,SHILT,BABALU,ARONA,HUNT, TK)

Only GSP can beat that!

And about RASHAD EVANS.
DANA WHITE said in TUF 2 that RASHAD and one dude are weakest guys in house.
And then when RASHAD fought he said that was worst fight ever!
And what happen RASHAD become UFC champion.

kswizzy99
08-04-2009, 08:44 PM
Well, when I count resume, I only look at the big wins and ignore the losses. And the only big wins that should be counted for Fedor are: Cro Cop, Nogueira(twice) and Coleman. The rest are either C or D level fighters or smaller fighters like Babalu and Arona.

Silva's resume goes as follows: Franklin(twice), Marquardt, Henderson, Leitis.

IMO, Silva gets the slight edge.

P4Pacquiao
08-04-2009, 08:48 PM
Well, when I count resume, I only look at the big wins and ignore the losses. And the only big wins that should be counted for Fedor are: Cro Cop, Nogueira(twice) and Coleman. The rest are either C or D level fighters or smaller fighters like Babalu and Arona.

Silva's resume goes as follows: Franklin(twice), Marquardt, Henderson, Leitis.

IMO, Silva gets the slight edge.



Yea but FEDOR didnt lose since RINGS and that was like almost 10 years ago and that fight was fruit cake.
We all saw rematch!

Fedor fought everyone left and right and so why would he fight in organization which owners like DANA WHITE hate him so much!

kswizzy99
08-04-2009, 09:38 PM
Yea but FEDOR didnt lose since RINGS and that was like almost 10 years ago and that fight was fruit cake.
We all saw rematch!

Fedor fought everyone left and right and so why would he fight in organization which owners like DANA WHITE hate him so much!

The difference is, Silva has fought every top MW of his era, Fedor hasn't faced the top HW's of his. He has yet to face Couture and Barnett. Sure you can say that Fedor would beat them, but that doesn't mean anything if he hasn't fought them. Silva has beaten the top MW's of his era like Franklin, Marquardt and Hendo. other than Nogeuira, Fedor hasn't beaten any A class HW's.

fallenloki
08-04-2009, 09:52 PM
Well, when I count resume, I only look at the big wins and ignore the losses. And the only big wins that should be counted for Fedor are: Cro Cop, Nogueira(twice) and Coleman. The rest are either C or D level fighters or smaller fighters like Babalu and Arona.

Silva's resume goes as follows: Franklin(twice), Marquardt, Henderson, Leitis.

IMO, Silva gets the slight edge.

It is quite obvious that you know your stuff... but umm... Why are you ignoring the victories over Arlovski and Sylvia? Also, Herring, Randleman, and Fujita were in the top ten when he fought them. Sure they aren't the best fighters now, but you can't act like they were never good.

I don't think that one guy is better than the other... GSP has hit his absolute prime right now, I just hate that he suffered two BIG TIME losses that he didn't need to endure.

This is off topic though...

Dana White is a ****ing idiot. He'd fortunate that he is friends with Frank and Lorenzo from childhood. The guy has such a foul mouth that any other organization would be embarrassed to have him. He's stuck his foot in his mouth SO MANY TIMES. It is honestly beyond ****ing counting.

The UFC was 30 - 40 million in the hole before FRANK AND LORENZO struck gold with The Ultimate Fighter. He was against that idea the whole time. Also, it is no secret that the guy has given favorable match-ups to Chuck Liddell, Matt Hughes, and any guy he was close with.

kswizzy99
08-04-2009, 10:51 PM
It is quite obvious that you know your stuff... but umm... Why are you ignoring the victories over Arlovski and Sylvia? Also, Herring, Randleman, and Fujita were in the top ten when he fought them. Sure they aren't the best fighters now, but you can't act like they were never good.

I don't think that one guy is better than the other... GSP has hit his absolute prime right now, I just hate that he suffered two BIG TIME losses that he didn't need to endure.

This is off topic though...

Dana White is a ****ing idiot. He'd fortunate that he is friends with Frank and Lorenzo from childhood. The guy has such a foul mouth that any other organization would be embarrassed to have him. He's stuck his foot in his mouth SO MANY TIMES. It is honestly beyond ****ing counting.

The UFC was 30 - 40 million in the hole before FRANK AND LORENZO struck gold with The Ultimate Fighter. He was against that idea the whole time. Also, it is no secret that the guy has given favorable match-ups to Chuck Liddell, Matt Hughes, and any guy he was close with.

I don't count Arlovski and Sylvia simply because the biggest wins that either of them have is against each other. So unless atleast one of them had a big career outside of each other, they cannot possibly be considered great fighters.

and yes, on second thought, fujita was a great win for Emelianenko.

and Randleman's career was completely based on his potential and hype, but he never even came close to fulfilling those expectations. he has some big wins but not enough to even be considered a B class fighter. and if Randlman should be counted, then there are several more fighters on Silva's resume that are just as good or better.

Pork Chop
08-04-2009, 11:21 PM
Well, when I count resume, I only look at the big wins and ignore the losses. And the only big wins that should be counted for Fedor are: Cro Cop, Nogueira(twice) and Coleman. The rest are either C or D level fighters or smaller fighters like Babalu and Arona.

Silva's resume goes as follows: Franklin(twice), Marquardt, Henderson, Leitis.

IMO, Silva gets the slight edge.

I love how you guys rewrite history after the fact...
Herring was #1 contender to Pride's title belt when Fedor beat him.
Former UFC titlists on Fedor's list:
Randleman, Coleman (2x), Nogueira (2x), Arlovski, Sylvia
Fujita was a solid win

We're talking pound for pound here anyway
Who the heck has Silva beat that weighed over 100lbs more than him?
When you take giants like Schilt, Choi, Zuluzinho, you can't really put any of silva's competition up to that much of a size differential.

EDIT: Sorry, was responding to your post when you posted that last reply. I still think Randleman deserves to be on the list for being a prior UFC champ.

kswizzy99
08-04-2009, 11:31 PM
I love how you guys rewrite history after the fact...
Herring was #1 contender to Pride's title belt when Fedor beat him.
Former UFC titlists on Fedor's list:
Randleman, Coleman (2x), Nogueira (2x), Arlovski, Sylvia
Fujita was a solid win

We're talking pound for pound here anyway
Who the heck has Silva beat that weighed over 100lbs more than him?
When you take giants like Schilt, Choi, Zuluzinho, you can't really put any of silva's competition up to that much of a size differential.

EDIT: Sorry, was responding to your post when you posted that last reply. I still think Randleman deserves to be on the list for being a prior UFC champ.

ok, I'll accept the pound differential argument to give Fedor the edge but Fedor still hasn't beaten every top HW(Couture, Barnett) of his era while Silva has beaten every top MW. And if you want to count UFC HW champs, that is fine, but you have to realize that Silva's last couple of opponents are all capable of being champions if Silva wasn't there. and Herring would be at the same level as Cote, Lutter and Leben if you want to count contenders to the list.

fallenloki
08-04-2009, 11:33 PM
I don't count Arlovski and Sylvia simply because the biggest wins that either of them have is against each other. So unless atleast one of them had a big career outside of each other, they cannot possibly be considered great fighters.

and yes, on second thought, fujita was a great win for Emelianenko.

and Randleman's career was completely based on his potential and hype, but he never even came close to fulfilling those expectations. he has some big wins but not enough to even be considered a B class fighter. and if Randlman should be counted, then there are several more fighters on Silva's resume that are just as good or better.

Yeah, dude... I can't agree with you omitting the two best heavyweights in the UFC for a few years. I hated Sylvia, but the dude could win.