View Full Version : [HOLY S**T!] fnr4 game testers


robjr
06-28-2009, 01:06 PM
should all be fired.

arcade-ish slugfest. not boxing.

slow leg movement, impossible to get away and fight tactical.

the judges scorecards are wack.

and yes not puting face button "option" is still retarded.

the visuals and creating etc is all amazing.. but when it comes down to gameplay, they failed. sad truth.

every forum i check there is lotsa people angry about something in this game, and when it comes down to it, you just dont see that in good games. They gota make some improvements and fast. cuz i dont wana wait 4 years for them to fv<k up the next one

them_apples
06-28-2009, 01:12 PM
should all be fired.

arcade-ish slugfest. not boxing.

slow leg movement, impossible to get away and fight tactical.

the judges scorecards are wack.

and yes not puting face button "option" is still retarded.

the visuals and creating etc is all amazing.. but when it comes down to gameplay, they failed. sad truth.

every forum i check there is lotsa people angry about something in this game, and when it comes down to it, you just dont see that in good games. They gota make some improvements and fast. cuz i dont wana wait 4 years for them to fv<k up the next one



yea the game sucks balls, they had the right idea but it's got some serious issues. Going up and down to the body is to awkward, throwing punches on the move are tremendously slow other than the jab. Stopping and going to the body won't work after a delay. If it did what you wanted it do then it would be possible to hit and not be hit, I did it in fnr3 all the time and the game speed was the same. It's because of these retarded delays and glitchy control scheme (and I have always used stick).

on top of that body punches kill stamina and you can't even back up quick enough once your stamina goes. I'd suggest a slight damage increase on punches, and a huge, huge upgrade on throwing hooks on the move and going to the body, needs to all be much much faster. Hooks should be only marginally slower than the jab. Most of all, don't let people triple up so easy on the jabs and straights - it creates spam. It seems like even when I beat somebody my health is always just as low as theirs.


I'm one of those guys that quits when he's losing, I never did it in fnr3, but when you know that the only thing you can do is counter spam back with one punch and hope for the best - the least you can do is quit. I'm sure I could adapt to this brawling stick masher, but meh - whats the point..no fun.

Sick/
06-28-2009, 01:37 PM
I don't like the gameplay atall. might be selling this on Ebay soon

Don Corleone
06-28-2009, 01:40 PM
I don't like the gameplay atall. might be selling this on Ebay soon

Good luck in finding someone who wants it

punchDrUnK MONK
06-28-2009, 02:42 PM
haters

this game is sick. better than rd 3 easily

sterling
06-28-2009, 03:33 PM
it seems quite fun imo

P4PKING_2008 :)
06-28-2009, 03:40 PM
Its mad addictive and awesome to play. Been on it every hour I have been awake since I got it :D

Mersey
06-28-2009, 03:52 PM
I love the game so far. Not as good as I expected but still 10x better than FN3, which I played for a long time.

The judges score cards are absolutley **** tho. Sometimes they don't score knockdowns its weird.

street bully
06-28-2009, 04:08 PM
I love the game so far. Not as good as I expected but still 10x better than FN3, which I played for a long time.

The judges score cards are absolutley **** tho. Sometimes they don't score knockdowns its weird.

I almost got robbed once. I thought I was winning every round, but I ended up ti a SD win.

ИATAS
06-28-2009, 08:57 PM
man I disagree. I think it's the best boxing game in a long time. I have tactical fights all the time and that's the way I typically chose to fight (unless I'm Tyson or someone like that).

It's not perfect and there are many areas that need to be improved, but to me, it's 1000X better than FN3 and that's what I was hoping for, not to mention the career mode is much deeper and the CPU is very fun to play, very intelligent and offer many different fighting styles. I give it a 9/10

them_apples
06-28-2009, 09:23 PM
man I disagree. I think it's the best boxing game in a long time. I have tactical fights all the time and that's the way I typically chose to fight (unless I'm Tyson or someone like that).

It's not perfect and there are many areas that need to be improved, but to me, it's 1000X better than FN3 and that's what I was hoping for, not to mention the career mode is much deeper and the CPU is very fun to play, very intelligent and offer many different fighting styles. I give it a 9/10

how though? sometimes i cant even throw punches (im using the fnr3 classic control option)

ИATAS
06-29-2009, 11:37 AM
Why cant you throw punches?

THE REED™
06-29-2009, 11:38 AM
I fight tactical in every fight... I can box.. I can keep my opponent at a distance.. I can move, I can pick my shots... in and out all day.

People who cant, just havent learned how.

THE REED™
06-29-2009, 11:40 AM
I love the game so far. Not as good as I expected but still 10x better than FN3, which I played for a long time.

The judges score cards are absolutley **** tho. Sometimes they don't score knockdowns its weird.

If you were winning the round, but you got knocked down, they score it 10-9 for the oponent not 10-8

letsgobrady
06-29-2009, 11:54 AM
yea the game sucks balls, they had the right idea but it's got some serious issues. Going up and down to the body is to awkward, throwing punches on the move are tremendously slow other than the jab. Stopping and going to the body won't work after a delay. If it did what you wanted it do then it would be possible to hit and not be hit, I did it in fnr3 all the time and the game speed was the same. It's because of these retarded delays and glitchy control scheme (and I have always used stick).

on top of that body punches kill stamina and you can't even back up quick enough once your stamina goes. I'd suggest a slight damage increase on punches, and a huge, huge upgrade on throwing hooks on the move and going to the body, needs to all be much much faster. Hooks should be only marginally slower than the jab. Most of all, don't let people triple up so easy on the jabs and straights - it creates spam. It seems like even when I beat somebody my health is always just as low as theirs.


I'm one of those guys that quits when he's losing, I never did it in fnr3, but when you know that the only thing you can do is counter spam back with one punch and hope for the best - the least you can do is quit. I'm sure I could adapt to this brawling stick masher, but meh - whats the point..no fun.

all of this is true

letsgobrady
06-29-2009, 11:58 AM
I fight tactical in every fight... I can box.. I can keep my opponent at a distance.. I can move, I can pick my shots... in and out all day.

People who cant, just havent learned how.

can you do all of this online especially against a stick masher? i have plenty of tactical fights in legacy mode but there are still times when it seems like i can't move and punch

ИATAS
06-29-2009, 12:44 PM
^^if you fight a retard online obviously it's not going to be like a real boxing fight. Against those idiots just bob & weave and knock them out. I'm undefeated against people like that.

I've lost one fight online so far, and he simply out boxed me. He was the better fighter. We both averaged anywhere from 25-50 punches per round. It was a very tactical fight, we both were defensive counter punchers.

rizkybizness
06-29-2009, 12:47 PM
^^if you fight a retard online obviously it's not going to be like a real boxing fight. Against those idiots just bob & weave and knock them out. I'm undefeated against people like that.

I've lost one fight online so far, and he simply out boxed me. He was the better fighter. We both averaged anywhere from 25-50 punches per round. It was a very tactical fight, we both were defensive counter punchers.

bhop vs bhop

**** mustve been boring as ****

ИATAS
06-29-2009, 01:11 PM
bhop vs bhop

**** mustve been boring as ****

haha, actually it was Pernell Whitaker vs Pernell Whitaker. Which reminds me, I ****in hate when people pick the same guy as me after I picked first!

Which reminds me again- a different time my opponent picked whitaker and I'm like ok let me pick Diego Corrales...so I selected him and was about to hit X then like a dumb ass I accidentally pressed down at the same time I hit X and I selected Vinny Paz! lol, **** that was a difficult fight to win, but luckily the guy sucked.

rizkybizness
06-29-2009, 01:13 PM
haha, actually it was Pernell Whitaker vs Pernell Whitaker. Which reminds me, I ****in hate when people pick the same guy as me after I picked first!

Which reminds me again- a different time my opponent picked whitaker and I'm like ok let me pick Diego Corrales...so I selected him and was about to hit X then like a dumb ass I accidentally pressed down at the same time I hit X and I selected Vinny Paz! lol, **** that was a difficult fight to win, but luckily the guy sucked.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

which reminds me, i have a hard time choosing vinny paz or billy dib

ИATAS
06-29-2009, 01:19 PM
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

which reminds me, i have a hard time choosing vinny paz or billy dib

I've yet to play against billy dib online :(

rizkybizness
06-29-2009, 01:20 PM
I've yet to play against billy dib online :(

LOL i wish i had a PS3 for online play

im never going to buy the wifi adapter or an xbox live membership

TRAVI$
06-29-2009, 02:24 PM
Slug fest?
My last 3-4 fights went to the cards, because I was forced to stay away and pick shots

Some minor faults, but I was surprised by how realistic it was... I just don't know what you expect.

JmtRyan
06-29-2009, 02:35 PM
I had to fight tactially with Cotto when i was against Hearns, He was beating the **** out of me. Went to decision, and i won by one round.

the_blueprint
06-29-2009, 02:58 PM
on my legacy i lost to the same bloke twice in a row, then i lost al my ratings, so overall i was like 42 and i had to fight people at like 76, i was still ranked 11 though, pissed me off so much