Kempo Chris
07-27-2004, 01:00 PM
Las Vegas, NV -- Zuffa, LLC, acknowledged today that they were recently served with a civil suit by BJ Penn. Attorneys for Penn filed a complaint earlier this month with the Clark County District Court in Nevada against the owner of the UFC alleging the fight promoter wrongfully stripped the Hawaiian of the UFC welterweight title, which he won on January 31, 2004, by submitting reigning champion Matt Hughes.
Raleigh, Hunt and McGarry, P.C. of Las Vegas contend in the suit that in stripping Penn, Zuffa breached its contract with 'The Prodigy.' The Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt also asks the court for injunctive relief, which could restrain or prohibit Zuffa from conducting a UFC welterweight championship bout without Penn. Basically, Penn is attempting to block a possible October 22nd welterweight title fight between Hughes and Georges St. Pierre in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Penn has asked the court to enter judgment against Zuffa according to proof plus interest as authorized by contract and/or law, for consequential damages in excess of $10,000, for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, for the return of the UFC welterweight title, for declaratory and injunctive relief, among others.
Zuffa executives and litigation counsel have reviewed the document and contend there is absolutely no merit to any of the allegations. Accordingly, Zuffa will aggressively defend the frivolous case and will seek reimbursement for its legal fees and cost.
Raleigh, Hunt and McGarry, P.C. of Las Vegas contend in the suit that in stripping Penn, Zuffa breached its contract with 'The Prodigy.' The Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt also asks the court for injunctive relief, which could restrain or prohibit Zuffa from conducting a UFC welterweight championship bout without Penn. Basically, Penn is attempting to block a possible October 22nd welterweight title fight between Hughes and Georges St. Pierre in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Penn has asked the court to enter judgment against Zuffa according to proof plus interest as authorized by contract and/or law, for consequential damages in excess of $10,000, for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, for the return of the UFC welterweight title, for declaratory and injunctive relief, among others.
Zuffa executives and litigation counsel have reviewed the document and contend there is absolutely no merit to any of the allegations. Accordingly, Zuffa will aggressively defend the frivolous case and will seek reimbursement for its legal fees and cost.