View Full Version : Sources: Major terror attack possible this summer (USA)


DOGGx0
05-26-2004, 11:36 AM
(CNN) -- Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller will hold a news conference Wednesday amid intelligence that has increased concern over the possibility of a major terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

Such an attack could take place as early as this summer, according to several U.S. officials.

CNN plans live coverage of the Ashcroft-Mueller news conference at 2 p.m. ET (1800 GMT) on Wednesday.

Attacks might take place before the November presidential election in an attempt to affect the outcome, the officials said.

For weeks, security officials have expressed concern about several upcoming high-profile events, including Saturday's dedication of the National World War II Memorial on the National Mall in Washington.

Other potential targets include the G8 economic summit on Sea Island, Georgia, Fourth of July celebrations, the Democratic convention in Boston, the Republican convention in New York, and the Olympics in Greece.

Although there is no specific target, time or date for the possible attack, the information is the culmination of intelligence that has been known and gathered over time -- and it is the assessment that is new, the sources said.

At their news conference Wednesday, Ashcroft and Mueller are to discuss their commitment to disrupting potential plots by al Qaeda and other terrorists, CNN has learned.

The FBI is likely to issue alerts for several individuals the bureau would like to locate in the coming days, two counterterrorism sources told CNN.

The sources would not describe who those persons are and why they are wanted now. One source said the bureau would be re-issuing alerts for some people already wanted.

CNN has learned there is no plan to raise the terror threat level, which is at yellow, or elevated.

New York Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said his department had received "highly sensitive intelligence" as recently as Tuesday, and there was "nothing in that reporting to indicate a specific threat or looming attack against New York City.

"Nor have we been advised that terrorists are known to be in the United States actively plotting such an attack," Kelly said in a statement.

The Los Angeles and Boston police departments made similar comments.

An official with the Department of Homeland Security said the agency remains concerned about the general al Qaeda threat but had no new specific information.

"We are not aware of any new highly credible intelligence indicating a planned attack in the U.S. this summer," the official said. She added: "Nothing in the current intelligence is exceptionally specific."

The FBI is expected to give guidance to its 18,000 state and local law enforcement partners in the regular weekly FBI bulletin Wednesday.

Officials said security will be unprecedented for World War II Memorial dedication Saturday. More than 140,000 people, many of them elderly, are expected for the event.
(Full Story) (http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/05/25/memorial.security/index.html)

More than 35 federal, state and local agencies have been involved in planning for the event for a year now. Some 1,000 law enforcement officers are expected to be on hand in addition to special support and response teams.

Following the March 11 train bombings in Madrid, Spain, security officials have expressed concern that so-called "soft targets" such as passenger and freight trains could be vulnerable to attack in the United States.

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge announced a series of initiatives to improve train and subway security shortly after the bombings.

The national terror threat alert level was raised to orange, or high, during the holiday season last December and January. It has been at yellow since January 9.

Before that, the United States last raised the domestic terrorism threat level to orange May 20, 2003, after suicide bombings in Saudi Arabia and Morocco that were blamed on al Qaeda. That alert lasted 10 days before the threat level was returned to yellow.

Other orange alerts were raised in 2002 around the first anniversary of the September 11 attacks and in February 2003, on the eve of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March.

In a related development in the war on terrorism, state and local police in New York and Vermont will soon have instant access to federal counterterrorism data under an FBI-run pilot program, officials announced Tuesday.

FBI chief Mueller and New York Gov. George Pataki said the initiative will enable beat cops to check watch lists of suspected terrorists and other information stored in databases maintained by the FBI, CIA, State Department, Customs and other agencies.
(Full Stroy) (http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/25/fbi.sharing.data/index.html)

Source: [CNN TV] (http://cnn/Programs/)

nance
05-26-2004, 02:57 PM
I have always believed that one of the reasons we were attacked is because they didn't like our President. All the more reason to stand behind him, United.

Slacker
05-26-2004, 04:07 PM
Originally posted by madcrewmom
I have always believed that one of the reasons we were attacked is because they didn't like our President. All the more reason to stand behind him, United.

Thats retarded. I should stand behind someone just because some ******* blows something up? Anyone that lets a terrorist attack affect who they are going to vote for is a spineless weak minded peon thats directly responsable for the mess we are in right now.

You vote for someone basied on how they will handle a terrorist attack, not because of a terrorist attack. Bush has ****ed up this situation so bad that I don't belive a ****ing word he says anymore. John Kerry is a little bit better, but the man has the charm and charisma of a flamming sack of crap. Ralph Nader is ok, but he looks like he just always woke up from a nap. If it was up to me, I would put Clinton back in office. So what if he liked to get his dick sucked at work. If I had the power he had, I would too. I would pick a better looking woman but I am not going to let his taste in women affect how I view him as a president.

Clinton rocked. Kennedy rocked, and Lincoln rocked too. It seems that ****ing women you aren't married too is the sign of a great president. I guess that why Arnold was elected in california. People heard all these stories about him groping and sexualy harrassing women and knew it was a good sign.

nance
05-26-2004, 04:21 PM
Originally posted by Slacker


People heard all these stories about him groping and sexualy harrassing women and knew it was a good sign.



Now that's retarded. It's funny how all those stories came out at the last minute, but NOT one of those women filed a complaint AT THE TIME IT HAPPENED

Slacker
05-26-2004, 04:26 PM
and it didn't affect the election for ****. I don't **** two ****s about if someone wants to whip his dick out and say "Suck it baby, I'm the president, or govener or mayor" or whatever. Hell, I would do that if I was in charge.

There are too many questions about Bush. I don't belive a word he says. Kerry has no charisma and if he loses thats the reason. Americans like a person who can work the crowd, get people fired up. The message means ****. Its the messanger. If Bush does lose, he should shoot himself in the ****ing head. Losing to someone like Kerry. Bring in John McCain or Hillary Clinton. Thats a race I'd like to see.

Bluecifer
05-26-2004, 05:43 PM
I like this slacker guy.