Exciterx24
11-14-2004, 01:12 PM
I've noticed a lot of Ruiz haters around here. Most of you just want him to disappear from the boxing world and I think this clouds your judgment. I will post my scorecard and wait for the replies full of hatred.
Round 1 - Ruiz(10-9)
Round 2 - Golota(10-7)
Round 3 - Golota (10-9)
Round 4 - Even (9-9)
Round 5 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 6 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 7 - Golota (10-9)
Round 8 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 9 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 10 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 11 - Golota (10-9)
Round 12 - Ruiz (10-9)
Total was 113-112 for Ruiz.
bigdlb12
11-14-2004, 01:17 PM
wasnt there a 10-8 round for Golota for the point taken away from Ruiz?
Soundtraveler
11-14-2004, 01:18 PM
All three judges took a point away from Ruiz in round 4 and STILL had the round as 10-9 for Ruiz - that is a shame. In other words if it weren't for the point deduction all three judges would have scored it 10-8 for Ruiz in round 4 !!
********* has the official scorecards copied and posted, if you are interested....
2 out of the three judges had it 9 rounds to 3 for Ruiz and one judge had it 8 rounds to 4 for Ruiz - I smell a RAT.... :mad:
Exciterx24
11-14-2004, 01:22 PM
wasnt there a 10-8 round for Golota for the point taken away from Ruiz?
Since I thought that Ruiz was winning the round, I scored 9-9, this happened in Trinidad-Vargas. Trinidad won the round but Nady took a point from him. Check out Lederman's card and you will see a 9-9 round.
ejk22
11-14-2004, 06:02 PM
Ledermans card had Golota winning unlike yours which makes no sense. (No offense) There is no ****ing way Ruiz won as many rounds as you suggest he did.
MetalVomit
11-14-2004, 06:05 PM
Ledermans card had Golota winning unlike yours which makes no sense. (No offense) There is no ****ing way Ruiz won as many rounds as you suggest he did.
amen, couldnt agree more
Exciterx24
11-14-2004, 06:30 PM
Ledermans card had Golota winning unlike yours which makes no sense. (No offense) There is no ****ing way Ruiz won as many rounds as you suggest he did.
Makes no sense to you. To me it does.
neils7147933
11-14-2004, 07:25 PM
The announcers in this fight didn't act like the decision wasn't just - they did for Sturm vs. DLH, Oquendo vs. Byrd, etc.
I think the outrage comes partly because of the description that people read that didn't see the fight. Golota looked just as bad as Ruiz and ate more effective shots than he threw. It was a terrible boxing match - it was what we could expect from those 2 styles, but it wasn't a robbery.
deuce_drop
11-14-2004, 08:14 PM
I've noticed a lot of Ruiz haters around here. Most of you just want him to disappear from the boxing world and I think this clouds your judgment. I will post my scorecard and wait for the replies full of hatred.
Round 1 - Ruiz(10-9)
Round 2 - Golota(10-7)
Round 3 - Golota (10-9)
Round 4 - Even (9-9)
Round 5 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 6 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 7 - Golota (10-9)
Round 8 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 9 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 10 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 11 - Golota (10-9)
Round 12 - Ruiz (10-9)
Total was 113-112 for Ruiz.
you must count clinching as punches landed, cause your card is absurd....
julDilla
11-14-2004, 08:28 PM
Round 1 - Ruiz(10-9)
Round 2 - Golota(10-7)
Round 3 - Golota (10-9)
Round 4 - Even (9-9)
Round 5 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 6 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 7 - Golota (10-9)
Round 8 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 9 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 10 - Ruiz (10-9)
Round 11 - Golota (10-9)
Round 12 - Ruiz (10-9)
Total was 113-112 for Ruiz.
a usual PR boxing fan would agree with you, i mean if morales was getting his ass handed to him, i would also try and give him rounds, to make him look good, your scorecards are a bigger jokes than the original judjes scorecards
ejk22
11-15-2004, 09:41 AM
The announcers in this fight didn't act like the decision wasn't just - they did for Sturm vs. DLH, Oquendo vs. Byrd, etc.
I think the outrage comes partly because of the description that people read that didn't see the fight. Golota looked just as bad as Ruiz and ate more effective shots than he threw. It was a terrible boxing match - it was what we could expect from those 2 styles, but it wasn't a robbery.
The announcers are a bunch of ****ing jerk-offs who acted as though they did not want to be there and instead of speaking out about that mother****ing piece of **** stone, they laughed along with his actions and disrespect he showed towards the referee. If George Foreman was announcing the fight, I guarantee you that Lampley and Merchant would have reacted differently because George would have called out stone for being a ****ing jerk-off scumbag who deserves to ****ing DIE!!!!!!!!!