Bernard Hopkins or Michael Moorer?

Bernard Hopkins or Michael Moorer?

Moorer was unproven at 175. He was a banger, but who did he really fight? I'd give him a punchers chance but think Hopkins would be to slick. I don't think Bernard is proven there either, but he's faced better comp in two fights than Mike did his whole time there. On top of that B-Hop has shown great skills against southpaws. Hop beats him like Pavlik with some scary momemts. Hopkins UD12. Jmo.

I think this is a bad fight stylistically for Moorer, Moorer would have a puncher's chance because his power was really good at 175 but as JAB said, he didn't really fight anyone that was too good at that weight, I think Hopkins would be too smart and too slick for Moorer.

Good fight. Moorer was a KO machine at LHW and could give Bhop trouble. But assumin this is a prime Bhop at 175, I think Moorer's aggression would leave enuf counter opportunities for Bhop to edge him.