Notice how in there Dave Metzler, the same guy who everyone keeps saying is honest with his numbers now has no proof that the UFC did a mil buys in any of its recent PPV's.

http://mmapayout.com/2009/02/ppv-numbers/

The article states no such thing.

Do you know how to read? Dana White,Kevin Iole and Megzter have been saying for months that Couture v Lesnar did over a mollion, and that the Dec show did waaaay better than that making seem like that show did a lot better than more than a mil. Now Mezgter is saying Lesnar v Couture didn't get a mil, and the dec show is at a mil. Who is to say they aren't lieing about this too?

UFC 91

verified as doing 920,000 buys. It will probably end up just under or possibly just over one million when all late buys are tabulated.

UFC 92

UFC 92 (triple main) is at 1 million.

it's #'s will also rise as the late buys are counted

UFC 93

trending data indicates about 320,000 buys, a shockingly high number... ...nearly 100,000 more buys than any prior U.K. show.

UFC 94

No numbers yet but UFC internal trending #'s indicate it will be better than 92.

PPV numbers always take time to finalize.

I know your no that dumb. Proably = likely under. Possibly= not as likely. Thats like saying DLH v Pac can Possibly do 1.5mil buys, since you know it was a month after Lesnar v Couture and i guess it's numbers aren't final either. Come on, its been a month and a half since the December show, and two and a half months since Rany v Lesnar. They aint going to find anything else.


I laught at the " No numbers yet but Tredning UFC data etc." Thats like asking Bob
what the numbers for Cotto v Jennings will be. His numbers are always going to be higher.