View Full Version : George Foreman would've beaten any Heavyweight in history in a trilogy.(vid)


Stormin' Norman
08-29-2008, 05:33 PM
I believe foreman, at his prime here, was better than anyone. Most people will say that Ali was the greatest, but I believe foreman would have beat ali at least 3/4 times at this time. The rumble in the jungle was a bad fight to test who was better. My opinion? I believe Foreman was better than ali at this time.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kpEuGaRp9l8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kpEuGaRp9l8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

them_apples
08-29-2008, 06:20 PM
I believe foreman, at his prime here, was better than anyone. Most people will say that Ali was the greatest, but I believe foreman would have beat ali at least 3/4 times at this time. The rumble in the jungle was a bad fight to test who was better. My opinion? I believe Foreman was better than ali at this time.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kpEuGaRp9l8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kpEuGaRp9l8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

he had the tools to beat Ali, but he decided to flail widely and gas himself out.
He was sort of like Tyson, winning got to his head and made him lose all his skills (even if he had few to begin with).

Dempsey 1919
08-30-2008, 02:17 PM
he had the tools to beat Ali, but he decided to flail widely and gas himself out.
He was sort of like Tyson, winning got to his head and made him lose all his skills (even if he had few to begin with).

He didn't have the tools to beat Ali. He was the quintessential slugger, and Ali ate those for breakfast.:fing02:

black.ink
08-31-2008, 05:13 AM
Foreman was not the smartest fighter out there, so there wasn't going to be much of a style change to influence a different outcome. The Ali he fought was not a prime Ali, but he fought the best fight to beat him at the time. I don't think Ali could have beaten him any other way, although the stick and move earlyyears Ali could have possibly decisioned him.

I'd say Ali would beat him 4 out of 5 times.

Yaman
08-31-2008, 07:44 AM
See, this is what I've hated the most out of any other fighter. Foreman just gets a free pass to beat everybody based on an argument that applies to NO ONE ELSE in Heavyweight history except him. Foreman is the only one that people will say: He will just walk trough him. Even though there are some big problems that people tend to ignore.

1-Foreman didn't even have any kind of defense on OPPOSITE DAY.

2-It's all based on him destroying Frazier and Norton. Forgetting that Frazier was rusty and couldn't have walked into a bigger styles mismatch. Same with Ken Norton, he could never deal with a very strong puncher with a lot of strength. These were gifts from heaven for Foreman and created this image of a Monster from another planet that nobody could ever slug with, and would walk trough even the best boxers with ease.

3-They think the Ali fight was just a fluke, that Foreman was the one just pounding on a lifeless Ali for every second of the fight, and that Ali's brilliant combo at the end wasn't the reason for George getting knocked out, it was exhaustion LOL. If they review the fight more they can actually see it was all due to Ali's brilliance. Counter punching, snapping jabs, difficult movements, brilliant tactics with the rope-a-dope. These contributed to wearing Foreman down, and it was the after effects of brilliant boxing that took Foreman out, not just exhaustion at his own hands!

4-They think the Ron Lyle and Jimmy Young fights were also just flukes, even though these are the biggest pieces of evidences that disprove the Prime Foreman myth. Ron Lyle actually showed the whole world that Foreman could be outslugged. He battered him, showed all of Foreman's weaknesses even in a slugfest, and the fight could have gone either way many times. Jimmy Young embarassed Foreman almost worse than Ali. No one exposed him quite like Young did. Watch that fight if you want to see Monster mega prime Foreman getting boxed his ears off without being able to 'walk trough' Young.


There are even more excuses. But these points imo disprove the notion that Foreman was unbeatable and that all of his flaws and losses early in his career were just flukes. I'm still trying to figure out why George gets a free pass every time and barely anyone says anything about it. Are people enjoying his grills that much? I bought one myself, and it's alright. Not THAT swell.

kayjay
08-31-2008, 08:02 AM
I'm with Yaman. Plenty of guys could slug with George.

Against big HWs of recent decades he'd have all sorts of troubles. Holmes, Lewis, Wlad, and even Holyfield would have very good chances against him.

TheGreatA
08-31-2008, 08:12 AM
I'm with Yaman. Plenty of guys could slug with George.

Against big HWs of recent decades he'd have all sorts of troubles. Holmes, Lewis, Wlad, and even Holyfield would have very good chances against him.

They could slug with him but I would always favour Foreman in a slugfest.

His fans do forget that Foreman could be outboxed, as a young man he wasn't too smart, as an old man he was too slow.

IMO Lyle lost the fight because he went away from his gameplan and started trading with Foreman too much. He was doing well countering off the ropes, like Ali and Young did.