Tyson123
08-19-2008, 03:23 AM
I personally believe Jack dempsy would KO him late in the rounds. But it would be a good fight. What you guys think?
|
View Full Version : Jack Dempsy vs Vladimir Klitchko Tyson123 08-19-2008, 03:23 AM I personally believe Jack dempsy would KO him late in the rounds. But it would be a good fight. What you guys think? duffgun 08-26-2008, 08:45 AM Vitali has the sort of style that dempsey loved, he did well against these type of fighters i see Dempsey by ko within 10. Brick Top 08-26-2008, 12:07 PM Klitchko would pound the shit out of Dempsy , are you kidding ! Klitchko is to big and way ****n stronger and more skilled then anybody Dempsy ever got in the ring with ! Wlad wins with just his Jab alone ! KO late rounds . Ryn0 08-26-2008, 01:11 PM As much as i like Dempsey the weight difference is to much Dempsey was boring on LHW in some fights Vitali is just too big. P4P Dempsey would win though. Brick Top 08-26-2008, 04:58 PM The thread says Vladimir not Vitali , either way Dempsy has his ass handed to him ! Derranged 08-26-2008, 07:15 PM Wladimir is just too big. Thunder Lips 08-26-2008, 09:32 PM While Wlad has done a good job protecting his chin in recent fights, the fact that he let Tony Thompson and Calvin Brock beat and bruise his ribs would have me concerned against one of history's most punishing body punchers. Wlad is a strong defensive clincher but so was Willard(who was bigger than Wlad in reach, and roughly the same height and weight.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFHAFNTjcSE The huge Jess Willard's defense first style was ideal for frustrating Johnson but he simply had no answer for Dempsey's speedy swarming. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48-J8K1PVkI Wlad obviously is a bigger hitter than Willard and has a much more dominating jab though he really isn't that much quicker with his hands or his feet. Dempsey was hard to find and his pressure was just so overwhelming that the stationary Wlad would have trouble getting anything off before getting caught himself. Wlad's lack of infighting these days won't do him any favors either, as he would rather clinch and take shots to the body to avoid getting caught short. Not a good idea against Dempsey who will take the body and work his way out of a clinch. I'm not convinced Wlad at this stage or any other would last any longer than a few rounds with a swarmer like Dempsey, bad style match up regardless of how much he weighs. randy johnson 08-26-2008, 10:53 PM While Wlad has done a good job protecting his chin in recent fights, the fact that he let Tony Thompson and Calvin Brock beat and bruise his ribs would have me concerned against one of history's most punishing body punchers. Wlad is a strong defensive clincher but so was Willard(who was bigger than Wlad in reach, and roughly the same height and weight.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFHAFNTjcSE The huge Jess Willard's defense first style was ideal for frustrating Johnson but he simply had no answer for Dempsey's speedy swarming. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48-J8K1PVkI Wlad obviously is a bigger hitter than Willard and has a much more dominating jab though he really isn't that much quicker with his hands or his feet. Dempsey was hard to find and his pressure was just so overwhelming that the stationary Wlad would have trouble getting anything off before getting caught himself. Wlad's lack of infighting these days won't do him any favors either, as he would rather clinch and take shots to the body to avoid getting caught short. Not a good idea against Dempsey who will take the body and work his way out of a clinch. I'm not convinced Wlad at this stage or any other would last any longer than a few rounds with a swarmer like Dempsey, bad style match up regardless of how much he weighs. Take the pedophile off your profile and maybe people will take you more serious because you have no clue to what you are talking about. If 190 pound fighters could knock out 250 pound ones then there would be no need for a cruiserweight division would there? You can't try to compare trash from back in the day to a mordern fighter. Even if Dempsey was 6'5 240 pounds himself he would still lose. He had no skills and he was knocked out in 1 round before i believe by Jim Flynn. If Wlad has no chin then this joke has none either. Wlad knocks this bum out in a round or so. SWEET SUGAR 08-27-2008, 02:12 PM Wladimir is to big and will outbox Dempsey. duffgun 08-27-2008, 03:18 PM If 190 pound fighters could knock out 250 pound ones then there would be no need for a cruiserweight division would there? You can't try to compare trash from back in the day to a mordern fighter. Even if Dempsey was 6'5 240 pounds himself he would still lose. He had no skills and he was knocked out in 1 round before i believe by Jim Flynn. If Wlad has no chin then this joke has none either. Wlad knocks this bum out in a round or so. Dempsey did ko fighters around that weight Willard weighed 245 lb and had a style very much like the Klits, Dempsey was very good at getting on the inside against these big heavyweights and pounding there upright body's. Thunder Lips 08-27-2008, 09:16 PM Take the pedophile off your profile and maybe people will take you more serious because you have no clue to what you are talking about. If 190 pound fighters could knock out 250 pound ones then there would be no need for a cruiserweight division would there? You can't try to compare trash from back in the day to a mordern fighter. Even if Dempsey was 6'5 240 pounds himself he would still lose. He had no skills and he was knocked out in 1 round before i believe by Jim Flynn. If Wlad has no chin then this joke has none either. Wlad knocks this bum out in a round or so. Same shit, different thread eh? The cruiser division like so many other new modern weight classes of today were started by organizations for profit. Many cruisers had success at heavy by magically adding a few pounds to their frames, sometimes pure fat in Michael Moorer's case. As already pointed out the 190ish Dempsey actually did knockout big heavies, well regarded ones as well: Carl Morris 6'4 220 32 inch arms Fred Fulton 6'6" 208 84 inch wingspan And of course Willard who as I done pointed out was not only as tall as Wlad with longer arms, he was also heavier in this particular fight. Willard was also very similar to Wlad, he was a big and cautious clincher with a huge right hand. He was also very durable with great stamina, something we can't really say for Wlad as of now. Dempsey did destroy Flynn in their rematch; if the knockout wasn't a dive it was a flash fluke as the descriptions suggest. How many flukes has Wlad had already? I actually like the guy but yeeesh. poet682006 08-27-2008, 09:20 PM Same shit, different thread eh? The cruiser division like so many other new modern weight classes of today were started by organizations for profit. Many cruisers had success at heavy by magically adding a few pounds to their frames, sometimes pure fat in Michael Moorer's case. As already pointed out the 190ish Dempsey actually did knockout big heavies, well regarded ones as well: Carl Morris 6'4 220 32 inch arms Fred Fulton 6'6" 208 84 inch wingspan And of course Willard who as I done pointed out was not only as tall as Wlad with longer arms, he was also heavier in this particular fight. Willard was also very similar to Wlad, he was a big and cautious clincher with a huge right hand. He was also very durable with great stamina, something we can't really say for Wlad as of now. Dempsey did destroy Flynn in their rematch; if the knockout wasn't a dive it was a flash fluke as the descriptions suggest. How many flukes has Wlad had already? I actually like the guy but yeeesh. Applause! I've been saying that for years, along with all the Junior and Super divisions. Also I'd bet that a number of these 230+ pound got that way through the magic of modern pharmacuticals. Poet Tyson123 09-01-2008, 12:40 AM While Wlad has done a good job protecting his chin in recent fights, the fact that he let Tony Thompson and Calvin Brock beat and bruise his ribs would have me concerned against one of history's most punishing body punchers. Wlad is a strong defensive clincher but so was Willard(who was bigger than Wlad in reach, and roughly the same height and weight.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFHAFNTjcSE The huge Jess Willard's defense first style was ideal for frustrating Johnson but he simply had no answer for Dempsey's speedy swarming. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48-J8K1PVkI Wlad obviously is a bigger hitter than Willard and has a much more dominating jab though he really isn't that much quicker with his hands or his feet. Dempsey was hard to find and his pressure was just so overwhelming that the stationary Wlad would have trouble getting anything off before getting caught himself. Wlad's lack of infighting these days won't do him any favors either, as he would rather clinch and take shots to the body to avoid getting caught short. Not a good idea against Dempsey who will take the body and work his way out of a clinch. I'm not convinced Wlad at this stage or any other would last any longer than a few rounds with a swarmer like Dempsey, bad style match up regardless of how much he weighs. Take the pedophile off your profile and maybe people will take you more serious because you have no clue to what you are talking about. If 190 pound fighters could knock out 250 pound ones then there would be no need for a cruiserweight division would there? You can't try to compare trash from back in the day to a mordern fighter. Even if Dempsey was 6'5 240 pounds himself he would still lose. He had no skills and he was knocked out in 1 round before i believe by Jim Flynn. If Wlad has no chin then this joke has none either. Wlad knocks this bum out in a round or so. You'r a ****nig retart go ****ing learn something you piece of ****. Dempsy a bum? Wow you know nothing about Boxing. You gusy are acting like size actually matters! Its an advantage but Dempsy would destroy vlady by round 6. Genryu 09-06-2008, 01:47 PM Dempsey's style was meant to beat the bigger man. Dempsey after 5. KO. Viktor777 09-07-2008, 10:27 PM Dempsey ko round 1 vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|