View Full Version : Joe Calzaghe's options
Nicky_Hatton 04-21-2008, 06:08 PM Just thought I'd contain this in the limey lounge.
I mean the amount of people that are calling him out now, three decent names for his resume; Jones Jr, Pavlik, Tarver and possible Taylor and Dawson.
I don't think he has the desire anymore, other than a big pay day with Jones , which at the end of the day is fair enough. He does value his 0 very highly as well.
Do you think he'd beat all of these?
I think he should at least fight Jones and Tarver. Both past it but could be good match ups. For tarver they could have the whole restore British pride angle, avenge clinton (Also effectively means he beat Clinton) and the legend killer angle with Jones.
Ah well.
Not really anything new I've just said, just wondering what you lot thought?
fasman 04-21-2008, 06:15 PM He needs to fight Jones Jnr and Pavlik...
Tarver ain't really worth his effort....
mickeyb 04-21-2008, 06:22 PM Whatever he does...win or lose.. he needs to fight Roy Jones to cement his achivements.
Chunk 04-21-2008, 06:50 PM Whatever he does...win or lose.. he needs to fight Roy Jones to cement his achievements.
I agree, but i also reckon Roy is the biggest threat to Joe's '0'.
mickeyb 04-21-2008, 06:53 PM I agree, but i also reckon Roy is the biggest threat to Joe's '0'.
So?!?....Calzaghe is to attached to that thing.
A zero is only worthwhile if he's completely sure he took all-comers during his prime.
If he ducks Roy...and if he doesn't (for once i'm using this NSB term) IF he ducks Roy... then that 0 will be useless. It's just a number.
Chunk 04-21-2008, 07:04 PM So?!?....Calzaghe is to attached to that thing.
A zero is only worthwhile if he's completely sure he took all-comers during his prime.
If he ducks Roy...and if he doesn't (for once i'm using this NSB term) IF he ducks Roy... then that 0 will be useless. It's just a number.
I agree.
mickey's on fire.
black.ink 04-22-2008, 03:34 AM It has to be Pavlik or Roy. No matter who he gets, if he beats them there will always be excuses. Roy (past prime), Pavlik (Not proved at higher division).
That being said, Roy is probably the biggest threat. He's the only one i can see beating Joe. It's also the fight i'd like to see the most.
The Wire 04-22-2008, 05:02 AM What the hell is wrong with you people!? Roy Jones was shot 3 years ago, let alone now. Needs Roy to cement his legacy, are you people on acid or something?!
Nicky_Hatton 04-22-2008, 05:54 AM At a glance though, Roy Jones on your CV aint a bad thing.
GreenGetter 04-22-2008, 06:22 AM imo the only reason he needs and wants to fight roy is for the money it would generate. Calzag has openly admitted he only wants a few more fights capable of giving him huge paydays, which i dont blame him for tbh. However, although fighing and beating kelly pavlik would not generate as much cashola it would certainly help silence some of the american douches who seem to think he's a cab driver, grandad beating bum!
Question is does he actually give a shit what the american writers and plebians think? I doubt it very much!!
take the paydays calzag. you got nothing else to prove brotha!
Bob Anomaly 04-22-2008, 09:00 AM Its either Pavlik or Jones.
I personally think Pavlik is very dangerous. Joe got stung a few times by Hopkins who isnt the KO puncher Pavlik is. I think his size and aggressivness would also be trouble.
With Jones, his right hand leads would be a ****er. But Jones is chinny as hell, and maybe Joe could finally put him to rest. Plus Joe is too busy for old man Jones.
Jones has the money and i think he hasnt that much left. Calzaghe could potentionaly go out with a bang. But Pavlik is the star.
People will say Jones was shot and a victory means little. If he beats Pavlik, and Pavlik doesnt go on to achieve much else, then its just another Lacy overrated win.
Id go for Jones, who seems much more focused now than in his loses to Tarver and Johnson. Calzaghe could KO him.
dansapien 04-22-2008, 02:41 PM He needs to fight Jones Jnr and Pavlik...
Tarver ain't really worth his effort....
despite the fact tarver best jones twice?
calzaghe has no business being in the ring with jones, apart from the huge payday.
i'd rather he fought pavlik, jones will be an easy and meaningless win for him. he's spent enough time padding his record.
adietheforestfa 04-22-2008, 03:48 PM Forget all the has been washed up fighters. Joe needs to fight Carl Froch.
If he lets the cobra land a right hand hes goin to be staying down.
dansapien 04-22-2008, 04:30 PM Forget all the has been washed up fighters. Joe needs to fight Carl Froch.
If he lets the cobra land a right hand hes goin to be staying down.
i like froch, but he aint that good yet mate.
pavlik would destroy froch, calzaghe would destroy froch, kessler would destroy froch, miranda would destroy froch. end of.
capt_sam 04-22-2008, 05:39 PM Joe v Pavlik would be awesome. Pavlik may pose a bigger threat then RJJ owing to the power.
Didnt Bhop have a rematch clause?
adietheforestfa 04-22-2008, 06:20 PM i like froch, but he aint that good yet mate.
pavlik would destroy froch, calzaghe would destroy froch, kessler would destroy froch, miranda would destroy froch. end of.
hahahaha
then your alarm clock goes off mate.
fasman 04-22-2008, 06:34 PM despite the fact tarver best jones twice?
calzaghe has no business being in the ring with jones, apart from the huge payday.
i'd rather he fought pavlik, jones will be an easy and meaningless win for him. he's spent enough time padding his record.
More people would want to see calzaghe fight Jones, not Tarver...
If not Jones then even Pavlik....
And what attracts more people and makes more money for both camps then thats the fight thats going to be made....
Plus having beaten Roy sounds more attractive then having beaten Tarver...
dansapien 04-22-2008, 09:17 PM More people would want to see calzaghe fight Jones, not Tarver...
If not Jones then even Pavlik....
And what attracts more people and makes more money for both camps then thats the fight thats going to be made....
Plus having beaten Roy sounds more attractive then having beaten Tarver...
i completely agree, in terms of cash and celebrity appeal.
but to say fighting tarver would be pointless is wrong.
i think most people would rather see calzaghe against pavlik.
dansapien 04-22-2008, 09:20 PM hahahaha
then your alarm clock goes off mate.
what show stopping performances against any fighters of real class makes you think otherwise?
was it one of the times he beat a journeyman in a front of a half full york hall?
Al Coholic 04-23-2008, 04:12 AM I think its almost certain that he's going to fight Jones. I would like him to fight Pavlik, but i cant see it happening. Pavlik would be the hardest fight of the 3 IMO
dansapien 04-23-2008, 07:58 AM Pavlik would be the hardest fight of the 3 IMO
without a shadow of a doubt mate.
fasman 04-23-2008, 10:06 AM i completely agree, in terms of cash and celebrity appeal.
but to say fighting tarver would be pointless is wrong.
i think most people would rather see calzaghe against pavlik.
Seen, but if he fights Tarver and ducks the other two and even if he wins people would start saying, that he ducked Pavlik and Jones...
However, if he fought Jones and won, people would respect him more....
If he fights Tarver then he would have to fight one more fight against Jones or even Pavlik.. Whereas he can fight Jones beat him and end his career....
I dont know but thats just what i reckon....
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|