View Full Version : Does size matter in HW boxing?


Nautilus
10-25-2004, 01:17 AM
Does size matter in HW boxing?

ChrististheAnswer
10-25-2004, 01:21 AM
Of course it does, sometimes heart and skill can overcome lack of size, but on the whole size does matter.

Nautilus
10-25-2004, 01:29 AM
Of course it does, sometimes heart and skill can overcome lack of size, but on the whole size does matter.

Some of the best heavies were quite small. I suppose there must be some optimal weight beyond which serious stamina problems occur. The optimal weight should also depend on the style of a figthter. I think Wlad gaining 20 pounds in the last two years is bad for his mobile attacking style. He needs to go back to 230, IMO.

I also think that 15 round boxing is almost a different sport than 12 round boxing, just like running 800 meters is very different from running 100 meters. Different men win those races. Being tall and heavy may well be a disadvantage if a fight goes the distance.

cple
10-25-2004, 01:39 AM
Yes, but it isn't as important as skill, talent, style, and intagibles.

Eken
10-25-2004, 06:40 AM
I think size can be a helping factor but without other attributes, such as speed, skill cardio etc it won't matter much. But if two fighters meet, equally skilled and conditioned, usually the bigger one ends up winning...

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 07:15 AM
look at nicolay valuev, he plants his opponents. hes about 218cm..

JOM'S
10-25-2004, 09:03 AM
absolutely size is an advantage and like what cple mentioned skill, talent, style & intangibles are more important.....

I also have to add punching power definetly is a factor and the equalizer to any kind of a disadvantage....

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 09:05 AM
boxing is much psyche.. big guys tend to bum you out..

dempseyfire
10-25-2004, 09:09 AM
Size matters but there is such thing as ''too big'-when you get as big as the McCline and Klitschko, your overall stamina and coordination suffers. Look at Valuev, the guy is a truck but he goes the distance with bums who were KO'd by other bums. One thing people mis-intepret is the coreelation between weight and punching power. Just b/c someone weighs more does not mean they are a harder hitter. Being a knockout puncher has as much to do with body movement and speed as much as weight. If you weigh too much, your speed and movement suffer. That's why none of these guys around nowadays are fighting like Louis or Tyson did-when you get over 220 or 225, you will not produce the torque of a leaner fighter.

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 09:12 AM
Size matters but there is such thing as ''too big'-when you get as big as the McCline and Klitschko, your overall stamina and coordination suffers. Look at Valuev, the guy is a truck but he goes the distance with bums who were KO'd by other bums. One thing people mis-intepret is the coreelation between weight and punching power. Just b/c someone weighs more does not mean they are a harder hitter. Being a knockout puncher has as much to do with body movement and speed as much as weight. If you weigh too much, your speed and movement suffer. That's why none of these guys around nowadays are fighting like Louis or Tyson did-when you get over 220 or 225, you will not produce the torque of a leaner fighter.

ignorant. people get bigger and some do it well. valuev is a great athlete!

dempseyfire
10-25-2004, 09:13 AM
Wow, you reall dissected my points well. Good job . . . .

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 09:18 AM
well, im not into anatomy. i just cant stand people talking down on valuev, i like him.

jabsRstiff
10-25-2004, 09:20 AM
well, im not into anatomy. i just cant stand people talking down on valuev, i like him.


Valuev....


Gotta wonder why this guy has been in the "prospect" stage since mid-1997, don't you ?

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 09:45 AM
Valuev....


Gotta wonder why this guy has been in the "prospect" stage since mid-1997, don't you ?

weheheell..! then its my pleasure to inform you that the recent calculations about him is due to new trainers and methods, something easily reflected in his later showings..

now tell that to your wife..

jabsRstiff
10-25-2004, 09:48 AM
weheheell..! then its my pleasure to inform you that the recent calculations about him is due to new trainers and methods, something easily reflected in his later showings..

now tell that to your wife..


Your drool-cup is overflowing, spaz.

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 09:54 AM
Your drool-cup is overflowing, spaz.

thanks, ill get my nurse to go put it in your water supply..

jabsRstiff
10-25-2004, 09:56 AM
thanks, ill get my nurse to go put it in your water supply..

Considering that stupidity is not contagious, just genetic & environmental, that really wouldn't worry me.

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 09:58 AM
Considering that stupidity is not contagious, just genetic & environmetal, that really wouldn't worry me.

great! you can have some snot too!

jabsRstiff
10-25-2004, 09:59 AM
great! you can have some snot too!


I already figured that was part of the package.
I don't picture you having much control over ANY of your bodily functions/fluids.

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 10:01 AM
I already figured that was part of the package.
I don't picture you having much control over ANY of your bodily fuctions/fluids.

now youre giving me bad ideas, its not smart to give people bad ideas..

whdempsey
10-25-2004, 10:47 AM
Yes, size matters. But size is like the spunginess of the canvas, it's only important if the fighters make it important. It can be as much of a disadvatnage as an advantage. If you need proof look at Dempsey knocking out Willard, or Louis knocking out Baer. Then look at Dempsey versus Tunney and Louis versus Farr. They had far more trouble with guys their own size than they did with really big fighters. I've said it before, and I'll probably say it again, the best heavyweights have almost all been about 215 or less.

As for Valuev, I won't bother arguing with you Panzergirl, but I will say this: He's not that good. This isn't basketball, and being 7'2" does not make you a great fighter. It seems to have made him slow and clumsy though.

oldgringo
10-25-2004, 11:23 AM
Panzerboy gets banned...and now we have to deal with Panzergirl. Both equally retarded. Both equally blind when it comes to boxing. Neither can talk about anything besides non-American HW boxing...hmmm very interesting.

oldgringo
10-25-2004, 11:26 AM
With the exception of LL, Foreman and Holmes, the greatest HW's were relatively small and quick. Size is only effective when the fighter can utilize his size and can use other resources outside of his size advantage.

Panzergirl
10-25-2004, 11:26 AM
Panzerboy gets banned...and now we have to deal with Panzergirl. Both equally retarded. Both equally blind when it comes to boxing. Neither can talk about anything besides non-American HW boxing...hmmm very interesting.

shut up! dont mention Panzerboy, if his friend and fellow think-tank members Panzerdude and Panzerguy gets wind of this, youll be in hellotrouble!

dempseyfire
10-25-2004, 11:32 AM
And Foreman and Holmes at their peak were 210-220, which would be considered 'a small HW' nowadays . . . . . even though Foreman's stamina, considered lacking when he was fighting, would top any HW of today save maybe Byrd . . . .

whdempsey
10-25-2004, 03:18 PM
Oldgringo and dempseyfire are right on. The only great, super-sized heavyweight has been Lennox Lewis, and he's not even in my top five. Foreman and Holmes were not huge - well, Foreman was tall and strong, but he was only 225 at his peak, much like Holmes - but they were larger than most of the great heavyweights. Of course, Foreman in his second career was pretty heavy, but we're not talking about a rock-solied fighter at that point, and Holmes in his over the hill days was pretty damn heavy, but those weren't their physical peaks. Anyway, we're still right.

Neuraxis
10-25-2004, 04:15 PM
If it didn't then the more skilled boxers at lower division like LHW and CW would come up and dominate it much more often.

oldgringo
10-25-2004, 04:23 PM
If it didn't then the more skilled boxers at lower division like LHW and CW would come up and dominate it much more often.

There are a good number of boxers that are coming up and having success (not dominating but having success)

Holyfield
Moorer
Byrd
Toney (hopefully still hasn't proven anything really)
Braithewaite (I think big truck can make the jump and be successful...his skills are a bit underrated IMO)

Neuraxis
10-25-2004, 04:31 PM
There are a good number of boxers that are coming up and having success (not dominating but having success)

Holyfield
Moorer
Byrd
Toney (hopefully still hasn't proven anything really)
Braithewaite (I think big truck can make the jump and be successful...his skills are a bit underrated IMO)

I'll give you the first three. I agree with you about Toney, and I am undecided about Braithewaite. So that's basically 3 over the past twenty years. And then there are all of the failed attempts like Juan Carlos Gomez and Jirov. All in all the percent of fighters from lower divisions who succussfully make the jump to heavyweight is not very good at all.

oldgringo
10-25-2004, 04:35 PM
Michael Spinks also had success at HW. There aren't insane numbers but the real deal HW's are all between 210-220 in general.

phallus
10-26-2004, 12:37 AM
Some big guys have a lot of power. Some big guys are just slow and easy to hit. i think size is important, maybe not as important as heart, power, talent, chin... i think about my favorite boxers and none of them is just because they're big

duxstar
10-26-2004, 01:32 AM
Like some of the other people said, size is an advantage if your a certain height, but punching power + speed is far more important.

leff
10-26-2004, 05:34 PM
People say the all time greats were not by far as good as todays big, the could mean that they are worse just because they are smaller, go too lower classes and youl see faster and better enduranced fighters.
That boxing is a lot more beautiful but it doesent mean they are btter than the heavies, 250cant fight like 200 men but it doesent men the big boys are worse it means boxing has changed.
Do you realy see Marciano whiping the floor with Vit?
ps i love them both.

Neuraxis
10-26-2004, 05:35 PM
Vitali still has to prove himself, but no I don't see Marciano whiping the floor with Lewis.