let's see...they both champs in 3 dif weight div...Tito won the middleweight belt by KO Joppy...DLH "won" the belt by robbing Sturm...They have common opponents but all were Tito's left overs..Vargas, Yory Boy Campas, Camacho, Oba Carr, etc. They both fought Nard..Tito lost by TKO in the 12rd and DLH got KO in the 9rd..they fought each other in 1999 and Tito won by MD..they never made a rematch cuz DLH even that he lost, he wanted the bigger slice of the $$$..DLH said that he was going to retire after the Hopkins fight, and after being "ko" by Nard he said he wants the winner of Tito-Mayo.. :cool:

let's see...they both champs in 3 dif weight div...Tito won the middleweight belt by KO Joppy...DLH "won" the belt by robbing Sturm...They have common opponents but all were Tito's left overs..Vargas, Yory Boy Campas, Camacho, Oba Carr, etc. They both fought Nard..Tito lost by TKO in the 12rd and DLH got KO in the 9rd..they fought each other in 1999 and Tito won by MD..they never made a rematch cuz DLH even that he lost, he wanted the bigger slice of the $$$..DLH said that he was going to retire after the Hopkins fight, and after being "ko" by Nard he said he wants the winner of Tito-Mayo.. :cool:

I like Tito more as a fighter.......DLH is the bigger draw and DLH was the better man the night they fought he just made a dumb decision to run the last few rounds rather than continue to outbox him (which he was doing quite convincingly). I think your Puerto Rican roots have you blinded in regards to this topic. I'm all for having your favorite fighters etc, but to blantantly disregard DLH's accomplishments and refer to him a possible Tito wannabe is rather silly. Early in DLH's career I thought he was a coward and a farse, but he has since convinced me that he is a true professional and has fought all comers and done/tried to do things many people could never dream of. Bottom line is these two are one in the same....they will go down in history as two of the best of this generation. I think they should thank each other, because I think each pushed the other guy to heights they never would have reached had the other not been around.

Tito is one-dimensional and De La Hoya is one-handed..

Tito is one-dimensional and De La Hoya is one-handed..


Don't be a hater because they both draw more and have accomplished more in their careers than your boy Mayweather.

I'm not hating...and Mayweather isn't really my boy, I'm just enjoying the hype while it lasts...when he does fall, it's going to be a tough loss for him...besides...Mayweather is kind of one-handed too as far as power goes..

Ask me who my favorite fighter is...that's simple...me.

Ask me who my favorite fighter is...that's simple...me.


LOL, fair enough.....when can I see you fight? You have power both hands? Has the chin been tested?

The chin is alot harder than Tito's and the power in both hands is Tyson-like...

The chin is alot harder than Tito's and the power in both hands is Tyson-like...

well dats what happened when u masterbate with both hands as often as you do
incredible strength
lol

I'll give you that one...pretty funny.

Ask me who my favorite fighter is...that's simple...me.

Isn't Tarver ur fav?..@ what weight do u fight?

No, Tarver isn't my favorite. I fight at Lightweight.

let's see...they both champs in 3 dif weight div...Tito won the middleweight belt by KO Joppy...DLH "won" the belt by robbing Sturm...They have common opponents but all were Tito's left overs..Vargas, Yory Boy Campas, Camacho, Oba Carr, etc. They both fought Nard..Tito lost by TKO in the 12rd and DLH got KO in the 9rd..they fought each other in 1999 and Tito won by MD..they never made a rematch cuz DLH even that he lost, he wanted the bigger slice of the $$$..DLH said that he was going to retire after the Hopkins fight, and after being "ko" by Nard he said he wants the winner of Tito-Mayo.. :cool:

are you kidding me with this?

dont forget DLH has won belts at 135,140,147 and 154 thats 4 divisions and DLH has fought the better competion of the two.You also have to count guys like Mosley and Quartey who were both top ten p4p guys when they fought DLH. Whitiker was also still a p4p guy and Tito waited until he was safely washed up before fighting him.

Weather you like it or not DLH will ALWAYS deserve the bigger paycheck between the two. This is boxing you dont get paid on skill or who won what you get paid on drawing power.Lets face it everyone in the boxing world outside of PR knows DLH really won that fight.

are you kidding me with this?

dont forget DLH has won belts at 135,140,147 and 154 thats 4 divisions and DLH has fought the better competion of the two.You also have to count guys like Mosley and Quartey who were both top ten p4p guys when they fought DLH. Whitiker was also still a p4p guy and Tito waited until he was safely washed up before fighting him.

Weather you like it or not DLH will ALWAYS deserve the bigger paycheck between the two. This is boxing you dont get paid on skill or who won what you get paid on drawing power.Lets face it everyone in the boxing world outside of PR knows DLH really won that fight.

First..DLH lost to Tito..deal with it. Second he didn't fought better competition than Tito..And third he fought Mosley and lost to him twice..hmm..maybe if Tito had fought mosley bfor DLH maybe then DLH would have beaten another Tito left-over like vargas, campas, camacho..etc.

One thing seperates these fighters in my opinion. Tito is a *****, and De La Hoya isn't..

first DLH did beat Tito...I think your the one who needs to come to terms with that one.

Secondly it doesn't matter what the outcome of the Mosely fights were its that HE FOUGHT him and thats what were talking about.

third YES DLH has fought better competion than Tito.

Commen opponents
Hopkins
Vargas
Camacho
Campas
Whitiker
Carr

DLH
Mosley 2x
Sturm
Hernandez
Gonzales
Rueles
Molina
Lieja
Quartey

Tito
Joppy
Ried
Mayorga

yup looks like DLH won

PLEASE...

Tito fought:
Mayo
B-Hop
Joppy
Vargas (when he was 20-0)
Thiam (33-1-0)
Reid (14-00
***** de la hoya(31-0)
Pineda (36-1-1)
Whitaker (40-2-1)
Barnes (39-1-0)
Turner (29-2-0)
Oba Carr (32-0)
Campas (56-0-0)
Camacho (44-2-0)
Blocker (34-3-0)

PLEASE...

Tito fought:
Mayo
B-Hop
Joppy
Vargas (when he was 20-0)
Thiam (33-1-0)
Reid (14-00
***** de la hoya(31-0)
Pineda (36-1-1)
Whitaker (40-2-1)
Barnes (39-1-0)
Turner (29-2-0)
Oba Carr (32-0)
Campas (56-0-0)
Camacho (44-2-0)
Blocker (34-3-0)

I listed there common opponents tard.

that means you have to gon on who else they fought and are you actually tring to tell me guys like Pineada, Turner, Barnes are worth anything? those guys where all jouneymen at best.

while guys like Genaro Hernandez, Miguel Angel Gonzales and Rafeal Rueals where all World Champions

Delahoya is a warrior a risk taker, and has fought every hard opponent there is, he even jumped up to middleweight to fight hopkins.

Tito is a punk *****, he wins all these fights and then loses his first fight, and what does he do, he runs and hides for a few years, because he couldn't stand losing, he had a cry.

If he was really the man, he should have trained harder then ever and came back stronger then ever, not run and cry about losing his first match.

This is pretty rediculous. DLH has fought ****in everyone and has gone to war with them. His quality of opposition is about as hard as anyones in the history of the sport. He beat Tito (not technically but come the **** on....) quite easily and shot himself in the foot at the end.

DLH is the bigger draw, the more skilled overall fighter, and has certainly not fueled his career off of Tito's scraps. The Quartey that DLH fought would have beat up Tito and took his milk money.

I think DLH is out of his element now...160 is too much for him. He should fight maybe 2-3 more times at 154 and call it a day.

Delahoya is a warrior a risk taker, and has fought every hard opponent there is, he even jumped up to middleweight to fight hopkins.

Tito is a punk *****, he wins all these fights and then loses his first fight, and what does he do, he runs and hides for a few years, because he couldn't stand losing, he had a cry.

If he was really the man, he should have trained harder then ever and came back stronger then ever, not run and cry about losing his first match.
DLH a risk taker??? :eek: ,he jump to middleweight to rob sturm and get KTFO by nard...Tito went to retirement cuz Nard didn't gave him the rematch..FYI he came from retirement looking better than bfor. :cool:

DLH a risk taker??? :eek: ,he jump to middleweight to rob sturm and get KTFO by nard...Tito went to retirement cuz Nard didn't gave him the rematch..FYI he came from retirement looking better than bfor. :cool:


yes going up to middleweight to fight Hopkins when you started your career at 130lbs is a risk

just let it go considering you have'nt had 1 person agree with you on this thread

but why run, staight after losing?

And Nard Not Giving Him a rematch has nothing to do with it, what is bernard the only fighter in the whole middleweight division?

You see a real champ, like, Lennox, Hopkins, Evander, Tyson, Delahoya, Gatti, Barrerra. keep fighting.

They are warriors, even when they lose.
They don't run off and say he wont fight me again boo hoo!.

I don't buy that, if he was for real back thenhe would have worked to become Nards Mandatory, but no he ran and hid, and thencomes back and suprise fights a guy who isn't a natural middleweight, who is just a blown up welterweight, who is unmotivated, lost to spinks, and is not skillful, and is a one punch fighter.

WOW, That's awsome.

yes going up to middleweight to fight Hopkins when you started your career at 130lbs is a risk

just let it go considering you have'nt had 1 person agree with you on this thread

i dont need ppl to agree with me, to say what i think.

i dont need ppl to agree with me, to say what i think.


you didn't state an opinion you asked a question.

"Is DLH a Tito wannabe?"

you didn't state an opinion you asked a question.

"Is DLH a Tito wannabe?"

And the answer is no. You should have just stated, "I think DLH is a Tito wannabe" as the thread title.

i dont need ppl to agree with me, to say what i think.

Hombre,no pierdas el tiempo. Aquí hay demasiados que odian a Trinidad y alaban ciegamente a DLH.

Hombre,no pierdas el tiempo. Aquí hay demasiados que odian a Trinidad y alaban ciegamente a DLH.

que se jodan... :D

que se jodan... :D

La verdad, no he visto uno solo que le de crédito a Trinidad.

why don't you guys just f-+k off in any language you want?

ppl happen to understand spanish ;)

I don't think Delahoya is a Tito wannabe. I do believe however Trinidad/Delahoya was a close fight but I also believe Oscar should of won that close fight. As far as Tito's retirement neither Oscar or Hopkins wanted a rematch for whatever reason. Tito asked for a rematch with Hopkins after his fight with Cheriffi but Hopkins after saying he would give Tito a rematch at anytime after the first fight went back on his word. Then Tito said he wanted the winner of the Delahoya/Vargas but neither would say the wanted the rematch with Tito for whatever reason. Tito wanted a big fight after his easy tune-up against Cheriffi and the big fights at that time were against Delahoya and Hopkins but neither wanted to give him that rematch so he retired. Not that they were scared but for whatever reason they didn't want a rematch. Tito didn't run away and cry after he lost all he did was try to make the big fights and it they didn't happen so he decided to retire.

why don't you guys just f-+k off in any language you want?

ppl happen to understand spanish ;)

Do you give a **** anyway?